<?xml version="1.0"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"><channel><title>DailyFinance.com</title><link>http://www.dailyfinance.com</link><description>DailyFinance.com</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2013 Weblogs, Inc. The contents of this feed are available for non-commercial use only.</copyright><generator>Blogsmith http://www.blogsmith.com/</generator><item><title>The Debt Ceiling and You: Is It Time to Panic?</title><link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/29/the-debt-ceiling-and-you-is-it-time-to-panic/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/29/the-debt-ceiling-and-you-is-it-time-to-panic/</guid><comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/29/the-debt-ceiling-and-you-is-it-time-to-panic/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/market-news/" rel="tag">Market News</a></p><p><img border="0" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="Debt ceiling" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2011/07/debt-ceiling-panic-240cs072911.jpg" />Until this point it would have been natural to assume that Congress would put aside partisan concerns and increase our borrowing capacity, as it has done 74 times since 1962. However, with the Aug. 2 deadline nearing and both parties continuing to bicker, investors need to consider how the looming debt-ceiling debacle could play out in our portfolios.<br />
<br />
What's at stake if the United States fails to pay its bills? No one knows for sure, but things could get ugly.</p>
<ul>
    <li>Last month, the International Monetary Fund warned that a debt default could spur "a severe shock to the economy and world financial markets."</li>
    <li>Yesterday, Credit Suisse cautioned that the stock market could fall 30% if the United States defaults.</li>
    <li>Skipping a payment to Treasury bond holders would almost certainly lower America's AAA credit rating, which would increase borrowing costs for the government, companies, and homeowners - and thus slow economic growth.</li>
</ul>
<p>Thanks to Congress' last-minute gamesmanship, merely increasing our borrowing capacity may no longer be sufficient to stave off a credit-rating downgrade. When Standard &amp; Poor's put the government's credit rating on negative watch last week, the rating agency warned that Congress and the administration must also provide a credible plan to address our nation's growing ratio of debt to GDP. With the two parties still far away from such a solution, the stock market is beginning to show signs of stress.<br />
<br />
<strong>How Concerned Should Investors Be?<br />
</strong><br />
Should investors be concerned that the United States will lose its AAA credit rating? And if so, how should they prepare? To find the answers, I turned to two Motley Fool economic experts: Morgan Housel and Matt Koppenheffer. Although the current climate is scary, our experts agree: Selling into panic is rarely a successful strategy.<br />
<br />
<strong>Rich Greifner: Guys, where would you place the odds that the United States will lose its AAA credit rating?</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Matt Koppenheffer: </strong>To this point, I've remained optimistic and assumed that the likelihood of that outcome remained pretty low. With Aug. 2 right around the corner, though, it's hard to maintain that optimism. It's also important to remember that there isn't some clear calculation done to determine the credit rating, nor is it bond investors "voting with their dollars." It's a bunch of eggheads at Standard &amp; Poor's and Moody's that wield this very significant power like Smeagol with his ring. As you pointed out, these folks may decide to knock the U.S. down a rung even if the debt ceiling gets raised in time.<br />
Right now, I'm down to a coin flip - a 50% chance that the United States' credit rating falls at least one notch.<br />
<br />
<strong>Morgan Housel: </strong>History backs up that 50% figure. We're on "negative" credit watch right now - basically, on the rating agencies' "naughty" list. And 56% of the time countries have found themselves on that list in the past, they've been downgraded.<br />
<br />
The rating agencies have explicitly said that any plan forged by Congress and the president will need to cut the deficit by around $4 trillion over the next decade to avoid a downgrade. None of the proposals currently put forth by either political party come close to that. It's been frustrating to watch them submit plans that they have to know still risk a downgrade. I think it shows how seriously they're taking this matter. <br />
<br />
<strong>Rich: Stock market experts are divided on the potential impact of a credit-rating downgrade. Some advocate moving to cash, while others believe a downgrade is already incorporated into current prices. Where do you stand?<br />
</strong></p>
<div style="color: rgb(192, 0, 0);" id="inContent"><span>Sponsored Links</span><script>adsonar_placementId=1505951;adsonar_pid=1990767;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=242;adsonar_zh=252;adsonar_jv='ads.tw.adsonar.com';</script> <script src="http://js.adsonar.com/js/tw_dfp_adsonar.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<strong>Morgan: </strong>I'm sure there'd be a short panic in the stock market, but long-term, I don't think it will be horrific. Where a downgrade could get us into trouble is in the federal budget. <br />
<br />
If interest rates rise just 0.7% - which is the difference between an average AAA-rated country and an average AA-rated one - it adds $100 billion a year to the cost of servicing the national debt. It would also slow GDP growth on the order of 1% a year, which could ding employment growth by nearly 1 million jobs. I think this is where those who think a downgrade would be a flesh wound lose credibility - the economy is so large and we're in so much debt that even small changes in interest rates make huge differences. <br />
<br />
<strong>Matt: </strong>With the standoff in full effect, there are really two downgrades that we need to think about. First is the "we raised the ceiling but the cuts weren't enough" downgrade. On that one I'm on the same page as Morgan - it would be bad, but it wouldn't turn the United States into a financial sinkhole. <br />
<br />
The other scenario is if we don't get an agreement by Aug. 2 and there is a default of any sort, there could be much more severe consequences. I could float some thoughts on what could unfold in that scenario, but to be honest I'd rather not think about it. But if you're curious how the bond market feels about countries that scare them as credit risks, check out the current yields on Greek bonds. <br />
<br />
<strong>Rich: Yikes! Final question: What advice would you give to investors as the debt-ceiling deadline approaches?</strong><br />
<br />
<strong>Morgan: </strong>Don't panic. Don't sell everything because you think the floor will drop out next week. That's the worst thing you could do. If things get hairy, be thankful for the opportunity to pick up your favorite companies on the cheap. <br />
<br />
Remember one thing: The three best times in U.S. history to invest in the stock market were 1933 (during the Great Depression), 1982 (inflation scare), and 2009 (financial crisis). Market panics are detrimental only to the extent you allow them to be.<br />
<br />
<strong>Matt: </strong>Panicking rarely does anybody any good. Particularly in the stock market. Or with bears, fires, or a potential NFL lockout, for that matter. <br />
<br />
As I've watched this lunacy unfold, I've been looking over my own portfolio, and I'm pretty satisfied that I own high-quality companies at good prices. I also have a decent chunk of cash. If the market does sell off, I may see some near-term losses, but I'm confident that the returns over the longer term will still be attractive. Meanwhile, I could get the chance to pick up some more of what I own - and maybe some of what I don't - at better prices. For me, the magic of doing good work up front and buying right is that I don't end up feeling like the rug is about to be pulled out from under me at times like this.<br />
<br />
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="300" frameborder="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://www.fool.com/ecap/remote/dailyfinance.aspx" marginheight="0"></iframe><em>See their profiles for more stock market analysis from Motley Fool analysts </em><a href="http://my.fool.com/profile/TMFTenacious/activity.aspx"><em>Rich Griefner</em></a><em>, </em><a href="http://my.fool.com/profile/TMFKopp/activity.aspx"><em>Matt Koppenheffer</em></a><em> and </em><a href="http://my.fool.com/profile/TMFHousel/activity.aspx"><em>Morgan Housel</em></a><em>. </em>
<p> </p>
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="300" frameborder="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://www.fool.com/ads/dailyfinance/df1.htm" marginheight="0"></iframe><br style="clear:both;"></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/29/the-debt-ceiling-and-you-is-it-time-to-panic/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/forward/20004747/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/29/the-debt-ceiling-and-you-is-it-time-to-panic/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>AAA ratings</category><category>AaaRatings</category><category>debt ceiling</category><category>DebtCeiling</category><category>ratings agencies</category><category>RatingsAgencies</category><category>sovereign debt</category><category>SovereignDebt</category><category>stock market panic</category><category>StockMarketPanic</category><category>US credit rating</category><category>US default</category><category>US downgrade</category><category>UsCreditRating</category><category>UsDefault</category><category>UsDowngrade</category><dc:creator>Richard Greifner</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2011 17:00:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Aeropostale: Cheap Clothes, Cheaper Stock</title><link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/25/aeropostale-cheap-clothes-cheaper-stock/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/25/aeropostale-cheap-clothes-cheaper-stock/</guid><comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/25/aeropostale-cheap-clothes-cheaper-stock/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/company-news/" rel="tag">Company News</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/stock-picks/" rel="tag">Stock Picks</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/market-news/" rel="tag">Market News</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/investing/" rel="tag">Investing</a></p><img border="0" align="right" vspace="4" hspace="4" alt="Aeropostale" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2011/07/aeropostale-store-240cs072511-1311616873.jpg" />I may not know much about fashion (cut to a shot of my co-workers nodding vigorously), but I know a cheap stock when I see one. And at current prices, <strong>Aeropostale </strong>(<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys">ARO</a>) is sitting in the stock market's bargain bin.<br />
<br />
Aeropostale operates 906 stores in the United States and 59 in Canada, selling cheap-but-stylish clothing to young teens. You don't need to be a mall rat to notice that the company's graphic T-shirts, polos, and hoodies look awfully similar to the clothes sold by competitors like <strong>American Eagle</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/american-eagle-outfitters-inc/aeo/nys">AEO</a>) and <strong>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</strong>'s (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/abercrombie-and-fitch-co/anf/nys">ANF</a>) Hollister. This is no coincidence: Rather than trying to set fashion trends, Aeropostale is content to copy what's already working for other companies. But although its merchandise may look similar to its competitors', Aeropostale's prices are much lower.<br />
<br />
Aeropostale thrived during the Great Recession, posting record-high margins as cash-strapped customers loaded up on its cheap-but-stylish tops and pants. However, discounts from teen retail competitors, rising commodity costs, and a few fashion missteps have weighed on the company's profits lately. After two consecutive disappointing quarters, Wall Street has soured on this former highflier, and Aeropostale now trades at a steep discount to its peers, even though it operates the most productive and profitable stores: <br />
<br />
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if !mso]><object classid="clsid:38481807-CA0E-42D2-BF39-B33AF135CC4D" id=ieooui></object> <style> st1\:*{behavior:url(#ieooui) } </style> <![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; mso-style-noshow:yes; mso-style-parent:""; mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; mso-para-margin:0in; mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]-->
<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" width="579" style="width:434.25pt;mso-cellspacing:0in;mso-padding-alt:0in 0in 0in 0in" class="MsoNormalTable">
    <tbody>
        <tr style="mso-yfti-irow:0;height:45.0pt">
            <td style="background:#E0E0E0;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;height:45.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><b>Company</b></p>
            </td>
            <td style="background:#E0E0E0;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;height:45.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><b>Sales per Square Foot</b></p>
            </td>
            <td style="background:#E0E0E0;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;height:45.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><b>Return on Capital</b></p>
            </td>
            <td style="background:#E0E0E0;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;height:45.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><b>Enterprise</b><b> Value-to-EBITDA Multiple*</b></p>
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr style="mso-yfti-irow:1">
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#E6E6E6;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><strong>Aeropostale</strong></p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">$626</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">53.7%</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">3.2</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr style="mso-yfti-irow:2">
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#E6E6E6;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><strong>Abercrombie &amp; Fitch</strong></p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">$390</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">11.0%</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">10.7</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
        <tr style="mso-yfti-irow:3;mso-yfti-lastrow:yes;height:4.0pt">
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#E6E6E6;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;    height:4.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal"><strong>American Eagle</strong></p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;    height:4.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">$420</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;    height:4.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">13.2%</p>
            </td>
            <td valign="bottom" style="background:#F3F3F3;padding:0in 0in 0in 0in;    height:4.0pt">
            <p align="center" style="text-align:center" class="MsoNormal">4.8</p>
            </td>
        </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>
<br />
<div style="text-align: right;"><em>*Data as of July 21, 2011. Data from Capital IQ, a division of Standard &amp; Poor's.<br />
<br />
</em></div>
<div> </div>
<div>That pricing discrepancy might make sense if Aeropostale's brand was permanently tarnished, the company was expanding recklessly, or it was run by a bunch of retail rookies. However, none of those conditions applies.</div>
<div style="color: rgb(192, 0, 0);" id="inContent"><span>Sponsored Links</span><script>adsonar_placementId=1505951;adsonar_pid=1990767;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=242;adsonar_zh=252;adsonar_jv='ads.tw.adsonar.com';</script> <script src="http://js.adsonar.com/js/tw_dfp_adsonar.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<div>Aeropostale's balance sheet is rock solid, with $139 million in cash and no debt. The management team, led by Chairman Julian Geiger and CEO Tom Johnson, is experienced and shareholder-friendly. Rather than aggressively expand its retail empire, Aeropostale elects to return its ample free cash flow to shareholders. <br />
<br />
Over the past eight years, the company has opportunistically repurchased $905 million of common stock, accelerating the pace when the stock drops and backing off as it recovers.<br />
<br />
<strong>Plus-Sized Margin Potential</strong><br />
<br />
After hitting all-time highs during the Great Recession, Aeropostale's operating margins have slipped recently, as competitors have slashed prices, and the company's girls' clothing failed to resonate with its customer base. A short-term improvement here is unlikely, as Aeropostale must deal with rising commodity costs, while marking down its slow-selling merchandise to clear shelf space for the back-to-school season.<br />
<br />
However, I believe the company has three opportunities to meaningfully boost its operating margins for the long haul:</div>
<ul>
    <li>The new children's clothing concept, P.S. From Aeropostale, is gaining traction with consumers. These stores are a drain on earnings now, but management believes P.S. will begin boosting the bottom line once the chain clears 100 locations.</li>
    <li>Aeropostale's website contributes just 7% of total sales, compared with about 12% for its competitors. Because online sales are high-margin, any improvement here will have a big impact.</li>
    <li>The company has only 10 licensed locations, all in the United Arab Emirates. These stores require no capital investment from Aeropostale and generate recurring royalties based on a percentage of sales. I expect additional licensing deals -- and high-margin revenue -- as the company expands its international presence.</li>
</ul>
<br />
<strong>The Bottom Line</strong><br />
<br />
Fashion retail is a risky business, but Aeropostale has a strong balance sheet, an experienced management team, and a brand that should benefit from a prolonged economic downturn. The next quarter or two may not be pretty, but I think this stock is a great fit for long-term-minded investors.<br />
<br />
<div style="width:100%;">
<div id="stockLinks"><i>Get info on stocks mentioned in this article</i>:
<ul>
    <li><a href="/quotes/american-eagle-outfitters/aeo/nys?icid=inlinks">AEO</a></li>
    <li><a href="/quotes/abercrombie-fitch-co/anf/nys?icid=inlinks">ANF</a></li>
    <li><a href="/quotes/aeropostale-inc/aro/nys?icid=inlinks">ARO</a></li>
    <li id="port"><a href="/portfolios/myportfolios">Manage Your Portfolio</a></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="300" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" src="http://www.fool.com/ecap/remote/dailyfinance.aspx" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" marginwidth="0" topmargin="0" leftmargin="0"></iframe>
<div><em>Motley Fool senior analyst Rich Greifner and The Motley Fool own shares of Aeropostale.</em></div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline" />
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="300" frameborder="0" marginheight="0" src="http://www.fool.com/ads/dailyfinance/df1.htm" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" marginwidth="0" topmargin="0" leftmargin="0"></iframe><br style="clear:both;"></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/25/aeropostale-cheap-clothes-cheaper-stock/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/forward/19999850/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/25/aeropostale-cheap-clothes-cheaper-stock/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>abercrombie and fitch</category><category>AbercrombieAndFitch</category><category>Aeropostale</category><category>american eagle</category><category>american eagle outfitters</category><category>AmericanEagle</category><category>AmericanEagleOutfitters</category><category>Motley Fool</category><category>MotleyFool</category><category>teen retail stocks</category><category>TeenRetailStocks</category><dc:creator>Richard Greifner</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2011 14:15:00 EST</pubDate></item><item><title>Lumber Liquidators Looks Ready to Rebound</title><link>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/13/lumber-liquidators-looks-ready-to-rebound/</link><guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/13/lumber-liquidators-looks-ready-to-rebound/</guid><comments>http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/13/lumber-liquidators-looks-ready-to-rebound/#comments</comments><description><![CDATA[<p>Filed under: <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/company-news/" rel="tag">Company News</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/earnings/" rel="tag">Earnings</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/retail/" rel="tag">Retail</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/market-news/" rel="tag">Market News</a>, <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/category/investing/" rel="tag">Investing</a></p><p><img vspace="4" border="0" align="right" hspace="4" alt="Lumber - low cost wood flooring" src="http://www.blogcdn.com/www.dailyfinance.com/media/2011/07/lumber-liquidators240cs071211-1310504430.jpg" />If a lumber company falls during a stock market rally, does it make a sound? This philosophical puzzle refers to what happened last Thursday to the nation's largest hardwood flooring specialist, <strong>Lumber Liquidators</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lumber-liquidators-holdings-inc-common-stock/ll/nys">LL</a>), which operates 250 stores in 46 states and Canada.</p>
<p>After the company cut its full-year revenue forecast in an impromptu business update Thursday, investors took Lumber Liquidators to the woodshed, sawing 28.5% off its share price. But while the short-term macroeconomic headwinds will undoubtedly be challenging, this highly profitable company still has a strong competitive position and ample room to expand, which is why I think this flooring retailer is a good prospect for investors' portfolios right now.</p>
<p><strong>The lowdown on low-cost flooring<br />
<br />
</strong>Lumber Liquidators provides its customers the widest range of hardwood flooring options in the industry at prices lower than its competitors can offer. What makes this possible is the company's uber-low-cost store format: bare-bones warehouses in low-rent areas and just a store manager and two or three sales associates running the show. By ordering its inventory in bulk, Lumber Liquidators is able to keep its merchandise costs low.</p>
<div id="inContent" style="color: rgb(192, 0, 0);"><span>Sponsored Links</span><script>adsonar_placementId=1505951;adsonar_pid=1990767;adsonar_ps=-1;adsonar_zw=242;adsonar_zh=252;adsonar_jv='ads.tw.adsonar.com';</script> <script src="http://js.adsonar.com/js/tw_dfp_adsonar.js" type="text/javascript"></script></div>
<p>The company's streamlined format produces phenomenal returns on capital. It costs Lumber Liquidators $300,000 to open a new store -- and all but $75,000 of that amount accounts for the inventory. The average new store is profitable within three months and returns its initial cash investment in less than a year. And because it's so cheap to build a new store, Lumber Liquidators has been able to grow at a breakneck pace. The company has expanded from 57 locations at the beginning of 2005 to 250 today, and management has set an eventual target of 400 stores.<br />
<br />
But won't the big-box stores snap Lumber Liquidators like a twig? Don't count on it. Lumber Liquidators' locations may not be as convenient as competitors' such as <strong>Lowe's</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/lowe-s-companies-inc/low/nys">LOW</a>) and <strong>Home Depot</strong> (<a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/quotes/the-home-depot-inc/hd/nys">HD</a>) or even your local mom-and-pop flooring shop, but customers are happy to drive a few miles out of their way to save hundreds of dollars on a new floor or browse a wider selection. In fact, it's the local flooring stores that should be concerned in this equation. These inefficient operators currently control about two-thirds of the market, but I expect Lumber Liquidators and the big-box stores to continue to steal those sales over time.</p>
<p><strong>Why Wall Street pulled the rug out from under Lumber Liquidators<br />
<br />
</strong>As you might imagine, this economy is a difficult environment for a company that sells big-ticket, discretionary, housing-related products. With the housing market and economy hurting, Lumber Liquidators' customer base has become much more price sensitive. While this trend should actually play to Lumber Liquidators' strengths, the company was caught off-guard this quarter and could not rein in its expense structure in time.</p>
<p>Part of the problem is Lumber Liquidators' fault. The company's botched implementation of a business software package last year has dragged on results for the last three quarters. While the company insists that the software issues are in the rearview mirror, last week's near-30% scalping indicates that the investment community has lost patience with Lumber Liquidators.</p>
<p><strong>Opportunity knocks, investors<br />
<br />
</strong>The market's knee-jerk reaction suggests to me that many investors are focused on the wrong metrics. While Lumber Liquidators' reduced revenue guidance was disappointing, it's clear that new Chief Operating Officer Rob Lynch's margin improvement initiatives are already bearing fruit. By renegotiating contracts with vendors and diversifying the company's supplier base, Lynch has Lumber Liquidators poised to post record-high margins by the fourth quarter.</p>
<p>Despite the dour macroeconomic climate and subpar first-half performance, Lumber Liquidators still expects to earn between $1.00 and $1.15 per share this year. At $18.50 per share, the market is pricing the company as if its sales trends and margins will never improve. But if Lumber Liquidators can generate a slight improvement in either category, I believe shares should be worth about $28 -- and if the housing market recovers, that estimate will likely prove conservative.</p>
<p><strong>The bottom line<br />
<br />
</strong>It's not often that one gets a chance to buy a fast-growing, highly profitable business at a bargain basement price. Take advantage of the stock market's short-term mindset and open up a position in this long-term winner today.</p>
<div style="clear: both;"> </div>
<p><br />
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="300" frameborder="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://www.fool.com/ecap/remote/dailyfinance.aspx" marginheight="0"></iframe><em>Senior Motley Fool analyst <a href="http://my.fool.com/profile/TMFTenacious/activity.aspx">Rich Greifner</a> does not own shares of any company mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Lumber Liquidators.<br />
</em><br />
<iframe width="100%" scrolling="no" height="600" frameborder="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" marginwidth="0" allowtransparency="allowtransparency" src="http://www.fool.com/ads/dailyfinance/df1.htm" marginheight="0"></iframe></p><br style="clear:both;"></p><p style="clear: both; padding: 8px 0 0 0; height: 2px; font-size: 1px; border: 0; margin: 0; padding: 0;"> </p><p><a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/13/lumber-liquidators-looks-ready-to-rebound/" rel="bookmark" title="Permanent link to this entry">Permalink</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/forward/19989390/" title="Send this entry to a friend via email">Email this</a> | <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/07/13/lumber-liquidators-looks-ready-to-rebound/#comments" title="View reader comments on this entry">Comments</a></p>]]></description><category>hardwood floors</category><category>HardwoodFloors</category><category>Home Depot</category><category>HomeDepot</category><category>Lowes Cos LOW</category><category>LowesCosLow</category><category>Lumber Liquidators</category><category>LumberLiquidators</category><category>motley fool</category><category>MotleyFool</category><category>Stocks to buy</category><category>StocksToBuy</category><dc:creator>Richard Greifner</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 13 Jul 2011 10:30:00 EST</pubDate></item></channel></rss>