John Hussman: Stocks are priced to disappoint for a decade

Posted 5:30 PM 12/14/09
Comments Print Text Size A A A Email This
It's not hard to find folks who think stocks are way too expensive relative to their earnings prospects, perhaps even matching tech-bubble levels. But when John Hussman says shares are priced to disappoint, intelligent investors would do well to pay attention.

Hussman's hardly a household name, but the highly successful money manger's funds -- Hussman Strategic Growth (HSGFX) and Hussman Strategic Total Return (HSTRX) -- have delivered annualized returns of 8.6% and 7.9%, respectively, since their 2000 and 2002 debuts. (They're cheap, too: The growth fund's net expense ratio comes to 1.09%, while total return charges just 0.79%.)

Meanwhile, the S&P 500 ($INX) is off nearly 25% since Dr. Hussman (he has a Ph.D. in economics from Stanford) started his first fund. In other words, when Hussman talks, people listen, and what Dr. John is saying is that stocks look cheap only compared to the record bubble levels of 2000 and 2007. Heck, they've nearly matched their richest valuations ever observed prior to 1995, Hussman told clients Monday.

"While it is quite true that valuations have been higher for the majority of the period since the late 1990s, it is equally true that the total return of the S&P 500 over that period has been dismal," writes Hussman. "Stocks are overvalued to a level from which uninspiring returns have always followed. That fact is true regardless of whether or not the economy is in a sustainable recovery."

Sure, in the near-term stocks can climb, thanks to speculative bets placed by big institutional money driving shares higher, Hussman says. But longer term, equities looked poised for a long period of historical underperformance.

"The S&P 500 is currently priced to deliver total returns averaging about 6.1% annually over the coming decade," says Hussman. How lame is that? Returns that low were equaled at the market peaks of the 1960s, early 1970s and 1987. Indeed, lower prospective returns were observed only during the late 1990s, which was followed by 10-year returns below 6.1% annually.

Recall that stocks historically return 10% annually (before inflation) and you can see how today's lofty share-price levels could be setting investors up for too little reward considering the risks they're taking. As Hussman says: "When stocks are overvalued, one does not get to have his cake and eat it too without getting indigestion later."

Print Email This
Dan Burrows

Dan Burrows

View all Articles »
Senior Writer

Dan Burrows is a senior writer for DailyFinance. He spent five years at Dow Jones. Most recently he covered investing, markets, tech stocks and the economy at SmartMoney.com. Prior to that he was a reporter at MarketWatch.com. He also covered retail and manufacturing at Women's Wear Daily for three years. In his career, he's had writing stints at Time Inc.'s FYI and Spy magazines, and has freelanced for Esquire and Maxim, among other publications.

Read More
SUBSCRIBE TO:
RSS

Add Your Comment

Follow Us
Follow Our Writers
Pallavi Gogoi Financial Writer
Peter Cohan Financial Columnist
Sarah Gilbert Features Writer
Gene Marcial Financial Columnist
Jeff Bercovici Media Columnist
James Altucher Financial Columnist
Mercedes M. Cardona Retail Reporter
Nikhil Hutheesing Assistant Managing Editor
Latif Lewis Business News Editor
More Writers

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNBC
Smart Money
Huffington Post
Luxist
Business NewsWhat's HotInvesting and Real EstatePersonal Finance at WalletPopOur Partners

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP | Advertise With Us

© 2010 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved