DailyFinance Toolbar

Vanity Publishing Is Booming, and the Big Houses Want In (at a Price)

Posted 7:00 PM 12/16/09 ,
Print Text Size A A A
It's a long-held truth of trade publishing: Only the most desperate authors would pay to get their books published. Vanity presses, the wisdom goes, handle books by the rank amateurs, the wannabes, the lowest of the low. Then last month, romance publisher Harlequin announced it was getting into the pay-to-publish game with a new imprint, then called Harlequin Horizons and now DellArte Press.




The response was controversy: writers' groups demoted the publisher from approved status, and those who self-publish or use subsidy publishers complained of being the industry's bastard stepchildren. But the real raw nerve that Harlequin unwittingly exposed is that in publishing, money always talks first -- and that money is increasingly flowing toward the pay-to-publish model.

Authors, Authors Everywhere

Publishing, after all, is in turmoil. Advances and print runs are slimming down, and the tiny e-books segment blazes hotter with each passing month. And publishers are desperately seeking talent in all the untraditional corners: blogs, Facebook status updates -- even books whose authors paid to get them published.

That ethos drives the largest pay-to-publish firm in the country, Author Solutions (ASI), Harlequin's partner in DellArte Press. Unlike trade publishers, whose current resigned mantra is "flat is the new up," on-demand and short-run services are making a lot of money, with an approximately 132% sales jump in 2008. But those profits aren't coming from book sales: A writer is lucky to sell more than a handful of copies. Kevin Weiss, CEO of Author Solutions, estimated an average of 150 copies sold for each title, and the vast majority of the more than 80,000 titles printed on demand annually don't sell a single copy at all.

In this model, the customers are the authors, not the readers. And ASI's range of similar-but-different imprints requires authors to ante up considerable cash to make their literary dreams reality. ASI's bread-and-butter is AuthorHouse (formerly 1stBooks). Devised by an aspiring writer who'd been rejected by more than a hundred publishers, AuthorHouse now produces 1 in 17 titles in print in the U.S.

Paying to Play

When Gazelle TechVentures sold AuthorHouse to Bertram Capital in 2007, the Bloomington, Indiana–based company went on a shopping spree, buying pay-to-publish giant iUniverse, followed this year by XLibris (49%-owned by Random House parent Bertelsmann) and a third pay-to-publish house, Vancouver-based Trafford Publishing.

All of these ASI-owned companies -- plus ASI's budget imprint, WordClay -- maintain autonomous identities and pricing strategies. Want a more D.I.Y. experience? Use WordClay. Got bigger ambitions for your book? AuthorHouse, iUniverse, and XLibris offer a range of print-on-demand experiences for the aspiring author's wish list: writers can pay up into the thousands for cover design, ISBN numbers, outsourced editing, even minimal marketing efforts.

While ASI's authors may not benefit from much marketing of their labors of love, ASI has been doggedly marketing itself to bigger publishers. It announced in October that it would provide pay-to-publish services to Christian publisher Thomas Nelson Inc. under the banner of WestBow Press, a separate division staffed largely provided by ASI personnel. Michael Hyatt, CEO of Thomas Nelson, says the partnership is intended to capture the Christian segment of the growing pay-to-publish market, with the goal of using Westbow to find authors for Thomas Nelson to publish.

Romance and Dischord

The Thomas Nelson deal raised eyebrows but nowhere near the controversy of the DellArte Press affair. The announcement by DellArte -- then called Harlequin Horizons -- came days after Harlequin launched Carina Press, a digital-only imprint that won't pay advances to its authors but offers siginificantly higher royalty rates than the established category lines.

The Mystery Writers of America and the Romance Writers of America blanched at Harlequin's plans to shepherd authors rejected by advance-offering imprints to DellArte, where the price for pay-to-publish services starts at $599. The two associations dropped Harlequin as an approved publisher -- a move that some member writers applauded, but which self-published writers criticized. (Neither ASI nor Harlequin returned requests for comment.)

ASI's Weiss responded to criticism in a YouTube video stressing that ASI is "part of an indie book revolution." The dispute illuminates an emerging culture war between traditional publishing and alternate revenue streams like pay-to-publish and e-reader exclusives. If DellArte and Westbow generate strong sales and profits for their parent companies, other major publishers may follow suit.

Author Solutions v. Amazon

If that happens, ASI may become a far more formidable player in publishing. (On Thursday, the company announced a partnership with On Demand Books, the makers of the Espresso Book Machine.) But to stay strong, ASI will have to fend off the efforts of Amazon (AMZN), which recently merged its pay-to-publish arms BookSurge and CreateSpace under one umbrella, and rival Lulu.com.

But ASI and DellArte face tough questions that no one wants to answer: What would happen in a market with more authors than readers? And is there an infinite window of opportunity from customers -- authors -- who might only ever see a single copy of their beloved book in print?
Sarah Weinman

Sarah Weinman

View all Articles »
Publishing Industry Reporter

Sarah Weinman covers the publishing industry for DailyFinance. She also writes monthly crime fiction columns for the Los Angeles Times and the Barnes & Noble Review, and contributes to The Washington Post, The Daily Beast, The Guardian, Maclean's, and New Hampshire Public Radio's "Word of Mouth."

Read More
SUBSCRIBE TO:
RSS
Twitter

COMMENTS ( 22 )
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next >>
balanceyourlife@yahoo.com
2:48PM Dec 23 2009 
I'm a book reviewer for one of ASI's brands. This is really the "American Idol Effect" in that everyone thinks they can write, but few people really can. In the 500++ books I've reviewed, less than 5% of them were good. Having said that, I still think that self-publishing and print-on-demand will continue to grow as the next wave of publishing. There just has to be a mechanism in place to showcase the talented writers and separate them out from the bad ones.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
Dperki2
3:37PM Dec 20 2009 
To see what how exploitative vanity presses can be to those who dream of publication, read this. It shows what you get for the money and what your chances of selling your books realistically will be:
http://www.falconesse.com/2009/11/21/harlequin-horizons-and-the-terrible-horrible-no-good-very-bad-deal/
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
Marthastemart
This comment has been deleted.
Anncrispin
6:10PM Dec 19 2009 
Aspiring authors who need information on getting agents or publishers should go to Writer Beware to get the straight dope on subjects such as POD publishing, vanity presses, which agents are "legit" and which publishers and agents get our "Thumbs Down" and should be AVOIDED.

Writer Beware is free, and it's sponsored by Science Fiction and Fantasy Writers of America (SFWA) and also by Mystery Writers of America (MWA).

The website is: www.writerbeware.com

-Ann C. Crispin
Chair, Writer Beware
www.writerbeware.com
  Reply Rate This Comment
(1 RATINGS)
LostLenore
6:00PM Dec 19 2009 
This news might trouble me if Harlequin had ever published anything but crap in the first place.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
Chorkumbleff
5:23PM Dec 19 2009 
_____Actually, I think the lady is a Nazi. To the published writers of Los Angeles and New York, all of us untermenschen unpublished are unworthy of their high and lofty positions. If writers fail to get published, it is because we are not the fair-haired, blue-eyed Aryans fated to rule all of mankind. Hey, looks to me like the lady's wearing all black in that-there portrait-photo thing--probably with a reverse swastika that's ju-u-u-ust out of view. Nazis, they really were into that all-black clothes thing sometimes for some uniforms, eh? We can hear the jackboots now...
  Reply Rate This Comment
(2 RATINGS)
Chorkumbleff
5:19PM Dec 19 2009 
_____So we're untalented, you say? We're the lowest of the low? What are you, a Nazi--calling us untermenschen? You want to trash-talk unpublished writers? Okay freak, YOU THREW THE FIRST PUNCH. Remember that when you get all of the forthcoming flames.
_____It's not what you know but WHO you know that determines if a person gets published. The publishing industry is now all about those in the know, those with high-powered names, getting their works published--while all newcomers are turned away en masse. Meanwhile, jokers like Adam Bellow and his pseudo-academic IN PRAISE OF NEPOTISM get published all over the place. On top of that, "There are no young writers!" shouted Ursula K. Le Guin during a recent NPR interview. The lady's right. Just like Hollywood and all of its inbred progeny, it's...not...skill. If you disagree with this, you're probably one of those people who argued that nicotine isn't addictive, global warming is a hoax cooked up by Commies and the hole in the ozone layer is a trick of the light.
_____Riddle me this. How the fork can Madonna get published as a writer? How can ANY celebrity get published? Their brains are fried from kilos of coke, gallons of gin, and years of smoking Mary Jane. yet they can take a dump on a piece of paper, send it in and--BINGO--publishing proceeds like mad. If anybody dares to say that talent is the factor which determines publishability, then they ought to lay off smoking rocks.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(3 RATINGS)
Jrepairguy
5:17PM Dec 19 2009 
We'll try this again. Where the stupid stars appear, it should read, "published it ".
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
Jrepairguy
5:15PM Dec 19 2009 
Um, you're a snob. There have been many, many instances over the years where mainstream publishers have passed on a GREAT book, only for some other smart, insightful publisher to realize a great literary work when they saw it and subsequently ********** to world-wide, rave reviews. Who cares if the author is unknown? You have to start somewhere, and if mainstream publishing is too snobby and/or stupid to realize a great writer, story, or both, then it only stands to reason that they would self-publish or subsidy publish to get their work known.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(3 RATINGS)
shanedieselblack
5:09PM Dec 19 2009 
these vanity writers need to suck on the dick!
  Reply Rate This Comment
(3 RATINGS)
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 Next >>
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR SIGN IN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
Make a Comment
Comment
 
Follow Us
Follow Our Writers
Pallavi Gogoi Pallavi Gogoi Financial Writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Financial Columnist
Sarah Gilbert Sarah Gilbert Features Writer
Gene Marcial Gene Marcial Financial Columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media Columnist
James Altucher James Altucher Financial Columnist
Mercedes M. Cardona Mercedes M. Cardona Retail Reporter
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Assistant Managing Editor
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business News Editor
More Writers

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNN Money
CNBC
Smart Money
Fox Business
Engadget
BloggingStocks
 WalletPop
AOL Small Business
Luxist
Housing Watch
AOL News
Business NewsInvesting and Real EstatePersonal Finance at WalletPopSmall Business

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP

© 2010 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved