DailyFinance Toolbar

'Botax' Out, 'Tan Tax' In: Health Care Bill Offers a Lesson in Lobbying

Posted 3:39 PM 12/22/09 ,
Print Text Size A A A

As the health care bill passed another hurdle early Tuesday morning with three more votes in the Senate, Botox maker Allergan Inc. (AGN) no doubt breathed yet another sigh of relief. Aiming to pass the bill before Christmas, legislators refrained from taxing elective cosmetic procedures, and instead opted for a tax on tanning salons.



The legislation includes taxes and other levies on various industries to fund the $871 billion bill. The Botax, as it has been nicknamed, was going to be a 5% tax on such things as Botox injections to smooth wrinkles, breast implants -- another Allergan product -- face-lifts and other elective cosmetic procedures. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid dropped that plan, however. Instead, it was replaced with a 10% tax on indoor tanning services.

Some may wonder: Why tax one and not the other? Aren't both essentially elective cosmetic procedures? Moreover, according to the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation, the tanning tax would raise an estimated $2.7 billion over 10 years, while the cosmetic surgery tax had been projected to raise over $5 billion.

Tanning Salons Made an Easier Target

It seems it mostly came down to lobbying muscle. While the Botax drew fierce opposition from Allergan, plastic surgeons, and the medical community in general, the Indoor Tanning Association seemed to lack the necessary lobbying muscle.

Allergan CEO David Pyott personally raised objections to the tax with lawmakers, according to Reuters, and the company launched a website and Facebook page to stir up public opposition to it. And Allergan wasn't alone. The company's efforts were supported and complemented by heavy lobbying from plastic surgeons and the medical community in general. They argued the Botax would unfairly hit middle-class, working women who make up a large portion of their patients.

Legislators seemed to face a tough decision: Risk losing the doctors' crucial support for the bill or find that funding elsewhere. IT was at this point that doctors came to the rescue, as the American Academy of Dermatology Association suggested the tan tax. Of course, it was accompanied by warnings from the Food and Drug Administration and from the National Cancer Institute about cancer risks from tanning beds' ultraviolet rays. No sooner than the Botax was dropped, the American Medical Association announced its support for the Senate bill.

It certainly seems that tanning salons were an easier target. The Indoor Tanning Association estimates that some 20,000 salons operate in the U.S., most of them small businesses with over 50% female ownership (compared to 25% in other businesses). The tax will hurt an industry already suffering from the recession, it claims. And as for the cancer risk, the association claims moderate tanning can have health benefit of vitamin D production. Indeed, phototherapy performed by a medical professional wouldn't be taxed.

The Senate is aiming for a final vote on the bill by Christmas Eve. The measure will then need to be reconciled with the House's bill, which will be challenging in itself. It may be hard to find a common language on several issues, including abortion, where major divisions exist between House and Senate Democrats.
Melly Alazraki

Melly Alazraki

View all Articles »
Stock Market Writer and Analyst

Melly Alazraki is a ten-year veteran of the financial world, working internationally for both sell and buy side firms. She's been a contributing editor with BloggingStocks for nearly four years and writes about the stock market and pharmaceutical industry for DailyFinance.

Read More
SUBSCRIBE TO:
RSS
Twitter

EMAIL:
Melly Alazraki
COMMENTS ( 17 )
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next >>
jihiol
This comment has been deleted.
linhiu11
This comment has been deleted.
mrmariecarter
3:39AM Dec 26 2009 
i so agree
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
mrmariecarter
3:39AM Dec 26 2009 
helll ya
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
mrmariecarter
3:38AM Dec 26 2009 
helll ya
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
LanceWilliamBeem
5:21PM Dec 25 2009 
Thank you for saying what the majority of us feel. Whether you are Demo or Republican or Independent.
We have seen the excess pork and wheeling and dealing before our vary eyes. We have been fed so many little white lies that add up to a succession of out of control spending. I heard someone say they worked for members of Congress and Executive Branch for 25 years. The old dogs liberal or conservative protect each other. In order to get in the "Press" you have to work with the "Press". That has to be tough.
We really just want workers in the Congress and a President not a figure head of a cartel. We want our country back. Could anyone imagine during World War II if we had such a self serving congress in power.
The Republicans have as much to blame as the far out Liberals. The values of who put them in there are a fleeting memory. I remember Obama saying this adminstration was going to be transparent. Words from a Chicago lawyer who was bought and sold along time ago. Intelligent.....rather arrogant if you ask me. Like a man looking in the mirror and liking what he sees. He has no where to go.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
LanceWilliamBeem
5:21PM Dec 25 2009 
Thank you for saying what the majority of us feel. Whether you are Demo or Republican or Independent.
We have seen the excess pork and wheeling and dealing before our vary eyes. We have been fed so many little white lies that add up to a succession of out of control spending. I heard someone say they worked for members of Congress and Executive Branch for 25 years. The old dogs liberal or conservative protect each other. In order to get in the "Press" you have to work with the "Press". That has to be tough.
We really just want workers in the Congress and a President not a figure head of a cartel. We want our country back. Could anyone imagine during World War II if we had such a self serving congress in power.
The Republicans have as much to blame as the far out Liberals. The values of who put them in there are a fleeting memory. I remember Obama saying this adminstration was going to be transparent. Words from a Chicago lawyer who was bought and sold along time ago. Intelligent.....rather arrogant if you ask me. Like a man looking in the mirror and liking what he sees. He has no where to go.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(0 RATINGS)
AbraxusRotts
11:15AM Dec 25 2009 
there is a congressional election in less than a year , then again in two years. lets start getting ready now!!!!!!!!!11
  Reply Rate This Comment
(1 RATINGS)
joinwealthy1134
This comment has been deleted.
BRubin3339
8:46PM Dec 24 2009 
The very least our political leaders could do for we the taxpayers, is to arrange for the folks that make Vaseline, send all of us a complimentary jar of Vaseline.

It make the screwing we continue to get......a little easier to bear.
  Reply Rate This Comment
(3 RATINGS)
Page 1 of 2 1 2 Next >>
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR SIGN IN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
Make a Comment
Comment
 
Follow Us
Follow Our Writers
Pallavi Gogoi Pallavi Gogoi Financial Writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Financial Columnist
Sarah Gilbert Sarah Gilbert Features Writer
Gene Marcial Gene Marcial Financial Columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media Columnist
James Altucher James Altucher Financial Columnist
Mercedes M. Cardona Mercedes M. Cardona Retail Reporter
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Assistant Managing Editor
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business News Editor
More Writers

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNN Money
CNBC
Smart Money
Fox Business
Engadget
BloggingStocks
 WalletPop
AOL Small Business
Luxist
Housing Watch
AOL News
Business NewsInvesting and Real EstatePersonal Finance at WalletPopSmall Business

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP

© 2010 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved