DailyFinance Toolbar

COLA wars: Social Security beneficiaries won't get a raise next year

Posted 2:00 PM 10/15/09 , , ,
Print Text Size A A A
The Social Security Administration announced Thursday that there will not be a cost-of-living adjustment (COLA) next year -- marking the first year since 1975 that Social Security recipients have not had an annual increase.

For 34 years, retirees have probably viewed the yearly COLA as their birthright. But the uptick isn't an in-step raise -- it's a benefit increase tied to the consumer price index for urban wage earners and clerical workers (CPI-W). In fact, until 1986, the CPI-W had to go up by at least 3 percent before social security beneficiaries would qualify for a COLA. Today, there only needs to be an increase of 0.1 percent before the Social Security Administration approves a COLA.


This year, the CPI fell by a shocking 1.3 percent -- the first such drop since 1955 -- which reflects a 29.7 percent drop in the price of gasoline and a 21.6 percent drop in overall energy costs. Food prices have dropped 15 percent off their high from mid-2008.

Fortunately for retirees, the yearly social security adjustment can only go up. For some recipients of federal benefits, including overseas members of the military, cost-of-living decreases can translate to drops in benefits. But even if CPI-W goes down, social security benefits cannot be reduced. In that sense, COLA might be a misnomer: A cost-of-living adjustment always increases benefits, so Cost-of-Living Increase might be a better term. (And if recipients of COLI got their notification by e-mail, then we'd have to call it E-COLI.)

At any rate, today's unwelcome news will disappoint Social Security beneficiaries, especially after the 5.8 percent benefit increase they saw this year -- the largest annual leap since 1982. This jump, tied to rising fuel prices last year, went a long way in 2009, as falling energy prices and a falling CPI-W translated into a boon to people on fixed incomes. And even as U.S. workers have face falling incomes and rising unemployment, 55 million retirees received $250 checks in May, and President Obama is lobbying for a second wave of $250 stimulus checks early next year.

Politically, these checks make a lot of sense. The President is not responsible for cost-of-living increases in social security, but he gets a fair measure of the blame when they don't go through. With midterm elections coming in 2010, Obama can hardly be blamed for greasing the wheels with America's biggest voting bloc.
Bruce Watson

Bruce Watson

View all Articles »
Features Writer

Bruce Watson is a features writer for DailyFinance, focusing on the political and cultural effects of economic events. A contributor to Military Lessons of the Persian Gulf War, A Chronology of the Cold War at Sea, the Journal of American Philosophy, A Cafe in Space, and the forthcoming Peanut Butter, Gooseberries, and Latkes! He has also worked as a research assistant in the British House of Commons and at the United States Naval Institute.

Read More
SUBSCRIBE TO:
RSS
COMMENTS ( 0 )
GOT SOMETHING TO SAY?
YOU'LL BE ASKED TO REGISTER OR SIGN IN BEFORE POSTING A COMMENT.
Make a Comment
Comment
 
Follow Us
Follow Our Writers
Pallavi Gogoi Pallavi Gogoi Financial Writer
Peter Cohan Peter Cohan Financial Columnist
Sarah Gilbert Sarah Gilbert Features Writer
Gene Marcial Gene Marcial Financial Columnist
Jeff Bercovici Jeff Bercovici Media Columnist
James Altucher James Altucher Financial Columnist
Mercedes M. Cardona Mercedes M. Cardona Retail Reporter
Nikhil Hutheesing Nikhil Hutheesing Assistant Managing Editor
Latif Lewis Latif Lewis Business News Editor
More Writers

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNN Money
CNBC
Smart Money
Fox Business
Engadget
BloggingStocks
 WalletPop
AOL Small Business
Luxist
Housing Watch
AOL News
Business NewsInvesting and Real EstatePersonal Finance at WalletPopSmall Business

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP

© 2009 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved