Get the latest in savings. Like us on Facebook.

Video Showing the Huge Gap Between Super Rich and Everyone Else Goes Viral

Posted 1:09PM 03/04/13 Personal Finance, Savings Experiment, Savings Bonds, Tax Laws, Savings Accounts, Saving |
Actual wealth gap explainedFor much of the past decade, policymakers and analysts have decried America's incredibly low savings rate, noting that U.S. households save a fraction of the money of the rest of the world. Citing a myriad of causes -- from cheap credit to exploitative bank practices -- they've noted that the average family puts away less than 4 percent of its income.

"Wealth Inequality in America," a six-minute video produced by a YouTube user named "Politizane," casts an interesting angle on the plummeting savings rate. Set to depressing piano music and packed with crystal-clear animations, it gives a powerful snapshot of the American economic landscape. Noting that "The top 1 percent own nearly half the country's stocks, bonds, and mutual funds," the video goes on to contrast those impressive holdings with the rest of the country. By comparison, it points out, the bottom 50 percent of earners own only 0.5 percent of those investments.

It isn't hard to see why there is such a yawning gap between the richest Americans and the rest of us. Since 1976, the share of national income earned by the top one percent of workers has nearly tripled, from 9 percent to 24 percent. It's not hard to see why their share has increased: As Clinton administration Labor Secretary Robert Reich recently pointed out, the economy has roughly doubled in size over the last 30 years -- and, in an ideal world, more money in the economy should mean more money in everyone's pocket.

But the distribution of this huge economic bonanza has been startlingly uneven. While the earnings of the top 1 percent have tripled, the average household income has effectively stagnated. Put another way, there's a reason Americans haven't saved: they haven't had much money to save.

In terms of information, Politizane's video isn't offering anything new: Its analysis of American perceptions of wealth distribution, the line between rich and poor and the issue of America's wealth continuum echo stories that have been in the media for years. But there's something about seeing the country's wealth gap in easy-to-follow animations that allows the dry analysis to hit home. Or, as the video puts it, these illustrations make it easier for viewers to "wake up and realize that the reality in this country is not at all what we think it is."




Bruce Watson is a senior features writer for DailyFinance. You can reach him by e-mail at bruce.watson@teamaol.com, or follow him on Twitter at @bruce1971

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1336 Comments

Filter by:
Aaron Chase Whitrock

@Panty_snatcher.

So the rich are poison? Or, people like me who have very little money but disagree with you, are poison because we don't share your views? Look at your posts, man. It is the exact same type of talk every hate-monger and racist uses and it is divisive and does no one any good.

Saying, "you are obviously rich," isn't actually an argument. If you have something to say, then say it. I acknowledge that things are worth exactly what people are willing to pay, so people who have more money offered more to society that people were willing to pay for than I have. Good for them.

The enemy isn't rich people. The enemy to the middle class might include a number of people in government who inflate the debt and mess with banking laws, okay, I'll grant that. There are certainly corrupt people especially in government who steal from the country at the expense of our economy. But we shouldn't be, "Rich vs. Poor."

It creates a divide between Americans and people where we fight and try and take each others wealth by force and the poor typically turn to the government for help getting money unaware that the ones unfairly getting money are often part of the government in the first place.

The super ultra banking family rich people are untouchable anyway and you aren't going to hurt them with the governments laws. you'll hurt people worth a few million who don't have the luxury of living off bonds and, if you hadn't stolen it from them, would have actually made jobs and spent most of their capitol creating jobs.

Dragging the people on top down doesn't lift the people on bottom up.

Thursday at 7:17 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Austin Eduardo Duber

This moron talks about "fair" as if he's the author of it.

May 05 2013 at 5:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Isabel Ortiz

WOW!!

April 22 2013 at 8:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
tonicollin

I just have one question. If we're going to re-distriute wealth, can we please start with Tom Cruise's?

April 21 2013 at 6:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
james4justice

A great piece of Article... And hasn't it been said that: If you were to seize all the wealth of the top 1 percent of the world and redistribute it, within 3 years the same ones who have so much now, would be right back on top?... So then, is the problem the top one percent, or a lack of education, drive, motivation, and wisdom on the part of the 99 percent? http://www.Startbizfree.com/ Dr. James Dazouloute

April 10 2013 at 5:59 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
Trey Powell

The most important sentence in this video is very short and starts at 5:24.

April 04 2013 at 11:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Todd Parsons

'm really sorry to burst your bubble but what you have shown in this video is not wealth inequality but productivity inequality. Your wealth is a measure of how productive you are over time. If you deliver more goods and services to people than others do then you will earn more and thus accumulate wealth faster. What this chart shows is that a very small number of people are delivering most of the goods and services to our country. The rest are in fact performing tasks that aren't worth a plug nickel. Take yourself for example. This video you produced is of absolutely no value to me. I have no intention of paying you anything for it. If you really want to improve your position in this chart then you need to spend your time delivering something that someone is willing to pay you for. To clarify the matter further - as an employee you have one customer - your employer who pays you. As an employer, someone running a business, you have many customers who pay you. The point being the employer is responsible for delivering more goods and services than any single employee is, hence he accumulates greater wealth. If you want to become wealthier faster then you need more customers for whatever it is you produce. The beauty of our system is that you don't have to be super productive to make a living. You just have to find one customer who is and call him your employer.

April 04 2013 at 8:16 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Todd Parsons's comment
Gary Aragon

Sorry, you are so far off the mark. There are three components to creating wealth in any society. They are: inspiration, ingenuity, and labor. Remove even one of these elements and wealth cannot be created. There are many small businesses that are run by one person who brings all three of these components to the business. But a business that grows eventually will need more people to add to the inspiration, to add more clever ideas to the business plan, and of course, more people to work the labor end. All of these people combined are creating wealth, and in my opinion deserve a share in it. Unfortunately, the wealth that has been in part created by the labor force has been completely redistributed to the newly created corporate elite. When my father was in the work force from the 1940s through the 1970s people worked for a company, many of which rewarded their work force with profit sharing and a pension plan. Companies that got too big for their britches became unionized to keep the corporate greed at bay. The middle class flourished. But since the 1980s the super rich have been chipping away, passing legislation that takes from labor and puts obscene amounts of money into the hands of few, creating what is now being called “plantation capitalism.” There is a place for labor in the world, and the super rich can still be rich even if they share a fair amount with those who chose labor as a way to make their way through this life.

April 05 2013 at 9:35 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
2 replies to Gary Aragon's comment
Juliette Dauterive

Well said, Gary.

April 10 2013 at 1:32 AM Report abuse rate up rate down
Austin Eduardo Duber

Don't you get it, the people get the fair share of wealth that they agree to for their labor. If we were to talk about fair then we would say it is unfair for them to get more than they agreed to.

May 05 2013 at 5:21 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
mpiro52

the majority of the 1% do not produce anything, they live on reinvested dividends and income. that is hardly productive. i agree with you that for the most part people who work harder and produce something of the most value earn the most, but that is not how billions of dollars in wealth has been created. it has been inherited, passed down through generous tax rates or tax havens.

April 19 2013 at 4:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
putt4eagle1putt

0:43 - 'The system is skewed unfairly' - How so? Did the top 1% steal their wealth? Outside of the rare occasion (Madoff), no, they didn't, People gave them money in exchange for products or services willingly because they valued the product or service more than they did the wealth they had. How is that unfair? This video says nothing about income mobility. Only 5% people in the poorest 20% bracket will still be there in 10yrs. Many will be in the top 20%. And many of the top 20% will no longer be there in 10yrs. The notion that this is unfair is either ignorant of the realities of economics or intentionally attempting to demonize successful people. What ever the reason, it's a senseless video.

April 02 2013 at 10:18 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to putt4eagle1putt's comment
panty_snatcher

you sir are obviously from wealth. you are the poison. you think that just because a free market system is built on the premise of freedom and equality it actually embodies such things. the realities of economics you speak of are the hidden truths that the system is in fact not your best interest in any way at all. i dont know where you are getting youre numbers but they are clearly senseless. how many of the bracket just above poor will move into the bottom?? im guessing its a lot more than move up

May 01 2013 at 7:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
filip3f

Great watch. Was always looking for a site with this financial information...Thanks. http://www.webllena.com

March 31 2013 at 7:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ss2thecoin

This video has been considered SOOO BIG but if you do the math with the provided numbers the top 1% still only have an average of $7 million/person. It's rich, yes, but not so terribly extravagant as it sounds initially. So honestly lets move on to something that matters, like installing a flat tax percentage so everyone really does their fair share. And no i'm not rich, I'm paying my way through community college bit by bit.
Love,
Shawn

March 27 2013 at 3:28 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Are you a
Savings Expert?

If so, send us your idea and we'll try to include it in an upcoming Savings Experiment

Create a tip