Whirlpool to cut 5,000 jobs to reduce costs

AP posted: 6:32 PM 10/28/11

NEW YORK -Appliance maker Whirlpool Corp. plans to cut 5,000 jobs, about 10 percent of its workforce in North America and Europe, as it faces soft demand and higher costs for materials.

The world's biggest appliance maker also on Friday cut its 2011 earnings outlook drastically and reported third-quarter results that missed expectations, hurt by higher costs and a slowdown in emerging markets. Shares fell over 14 percent Friday.

The company, whose brands include Maytag and KitchenAid, has, like other appliance makers, been squeezed by soft U.S. demand since the recession and rising costs for materials such as steel and copper. Due to its size, Whirlpool's performance provides a window on the economy because it indicates whether consumers are comfortable spending on big-ticket items.

Whirlpool has raised prices to combat higher costs, but demand for items like refrigerators and washing machines remains tight. Whirlpool is also facing discount pressure from competitors.

To offset slowing North American sales, Whirlpool has turned to emerging markets. But the company said Friday that sales have slowed there, too. The company revised its demand forecast globally. It now expects demand to decline 3 percent to 5 percent in North America, in 2011, down from a 1 percent to 2 percent prior decline forecast.

It expects flat demand in Europe, the Middle East and Africa, from prior expectations of a 1 percent to 2 percent rise in demand.

In Latin America, it now expects demand to be flat to up 5 percent, from prior expectations of a 5 percent to 10 percent increase. And in Asia it expects demand to rise 2 percent to 4 percent from earlier expectations of a 4 percent to 6 percent increase.

Steep costs and the dour global economy are affecting the entire appliance industry. Swedish appliance maker Electrolux said Friday that its third-quarter net income fell 39 percent and also cut its forecast for demand in North American and Europe for the year.

Whirlpool jobs to be cut are mostly in North America and Europe. They include 1,200 salaried positions and the closing of the company's Fort Smith, Ark., plant.

The Fort Smith plant shutdown will affect 884 hourly workers and 90 salaried employees. An additional 800 workers were on layoff from the factory and on a recall list.

Whirlpool will also relocate dishwasher production from Neunkirchen, Germany, to Poland in January 2012.

The company expects the moves will save $400 million by the end of 2013. They'll cost $500 million in restructuring costs however, which will be recorded over the next three years, including a $105 million charge in the fourth quarter, $280 million charge in 2012 and $115 million charge in 2013.

Benton Harbor, Mich.-based Whirlpool's third-quarter net income more than doubled to $177 million, or $2.27 per share, from $79 million, or $1.02 per share. Adjusted earnings of $2.35 per share fell short of analyst expectations for $2.73 per share.

Revenue rose 2 percent to $4.63 billion, short of expectations for $4.74 billion.

"Our results were negatively impacted by recessionary demand levels in developed countries, a slowdown in emerging markets and high levels of inflation in material costs," CEO Jeff Fettig said.

Unit shipments fell in all regions except Asia, where they rose 4 percent.

In North America, revenue fell 2 percent to $2.4 billion, and in Latin America, revenue rose 8 percent to $1.2 billion.

The company now expects 2011 net income will be $4.75 to $5.25 per share. Its prior guidance was net income would be at the low end of a range between $7.25 and $8.25 per share.

Separately, Whirlpool has complained to authorities that some companies, including Samsung Electronics and LG Electronics, have been selling appliances at less than fair value in the U.S., a practice known as dumping. Whirlpool said the Commerce Department issued a preliminary determination that the companies are violating international trade laws. The investigation is ongoing.

Whirlpool's stock fell $8.67, or 14.3 percent, to close at $51.80 Friday. The stock has already sunk 42 percent this year.

Copyright 2011 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

2011-10-28 18:32:40

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

69 Comments

Filter by:
daquiz57

One more instance of why this tax cutting fiasco will never work. Companies dont create jobs because they have extra cash laying around and want to hire people out of the goodness of their hearts. They hire people because there is a demand for their product and they require more labor to keep up with that demand. Raising corporate taxes, (or at least eliminating all the loopholes and credits) , can actually cause the companies to create more jobs, because it forces the companies to reinvest the money into their facilities rather than just taking the money and paying taxes on it. I will never understand why it is so much easier to hate the "other guy" than to try and solve the actual problems. The wealth of this country was not stolen by the poor people who are just trying to get by and live one more day, but by the grotesquely rich who will never be satisfied with $100 billion, when they can lie cheat and still their way to $101.

October 29 2011 at 12:32 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
DEBBIE

Corporate greed over americans need, they got the bail out and now they will sail out!

October 29 2011 at 7:55 AM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
evanrogers

Obamanomics at work. Thanks Barack

October 29 2011 at 7:50 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
NomadBud

Yep , Hope and change is working.

October 29 2011 at 7:10 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mooncop1

This government has gotten to big. We now have people all across this country sitting at home waiting for government checks for their support.

October 29 2011 at 7:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
smooth4x4

Ahhh, the "job creators" ! Good thing we didn't raise their taxes.

October 29 2011 at 6:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to smooth4x4's comment
evanrogers

Yes they did, unemployment and other subtle taxes have been increased.

October 29 2011 at 7:51 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
alamaden

I think this is a sign that things are turning around.... If GM, Ford, and Honda go completely broke, we know things are on the right track... we can always raise the taxes to give them a little bail out money...YEP...THINGS ARE LOOKING BETTER.... IF OBAMA GETS RE ELECTED A SPELL IS GOING TO CAUSE EVERYTHING TO CHANGE.... PROSPERITY, MORE MONEY FOR EVERYONE... PARKS RE OPEN,,, MORE POLICE AND FIREMAN PUT BACK TO WORK....ALL THE AMERICAN COMPANIES THAT MOVED OFF SHORE BECAUSE OF EXCESSIVE OVERHEAD IN THE USA WILL COME BACK..WE WILL HAVE A WELL FUNDED HEALTH CARE SYSTEM...SOCIAL SECURITY WILL COME BACK IN FULL FORCE... BUT FIRST OF ALL YOU FOOLS YOU HAVE TO RE ELECT OBAMA... CAUSE HE PROMISED HE WOULD TURN THIS MESS AROUND...AND I THINK HE COULD.... IN THE YEAR 2555????

October 29 2011 at 5:54 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to alamaden's comment
evanrogers

That quick? He must have some hidden ability I have missed. Of course by then he would have some experience, something he is sadly lacking.

October 29 2011 at 7:54 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
bfgair

Moving from Germany to Poland. Why? to save money on labor! Laying people off and closing plants, Why? To save money. Sales going down. Why? Saving money by using and building inferior products. Bonuses paid to upper managment. Why? From saving money for laying people off, using inferior parts, closing plants and wrecking loyal working employees lives.
Complain about the competition. Why? Cause they can't sell their junk to people that don't have a job anymore and they can't keep up with the compitation. WHY??? Because they are paying upper managment TOO MUCH MONEY AND THEY DON'T GIVAE A DARN AS LONG AS THEY GET THEIR BONUS CHECKS for saving money.

Oh almost forgot NOW THEY have the GALL to blame it on the Administration in Washington for their problems.
Bet they all are Republicans.

October 29 2011 at 4:43 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
3 replies to bfgair's comment
mike jones

The USA Don't Want SURVIVAL MODE Even If They Think They Do......

October 29 2011 at 4:33 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
mike jones

WW3 IN AMERICA Coming SOON If REPUBS GET THERE WAY......ALL THE POOR WITH KNOW GOVERNMENT HELP>>>>>>ALL THE POOR WILL BE IN SURVIVAL MODE

October 29 2011 at 4:32 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Newswire

Follow Us

Headlines From DailyFinance Partners

CNN Money
CNBC
Smart Money
Consumer Reports
Huffington Post
AOL Energy
AOL Jobs
Business News Personal Finance Investing Our Partners

DailyFinance Sitemap | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | Trademarks | HELP | Advertise With Us

© Copyright 2012 AOL Inc. All Rights Reserved