Social Security is a key way for retirees to get valuable income, and many people find that waiting until later to take their Social Security benefits is a smart move. But some experts compare the additional benefits you get by waiting to returns on investments, and that can lead you to make a fundamental mistake in your Social Security decision.
In the following video, Dan Caplinger, The Motley Fool's director of investment planning, notes how waiting to take Social Security from age 62 to age 66 helps you avoid a 5% to 7% per-year reduction in benefits, while further delaying benefits from 66 to 70 increases those benefits 8% per year. Yet some people are tempted to compare these figures to returns on investment, comparing those percentages to average gains you'd see in your portfolio. Dan warns that there's a fundamental difference that those calculations overlook: When you delay Social Security, you permanently give up the years of benefits you would have gotten by claiming early. That can still be a smart move in some cases, but you have to be smart with your financial analysis in order to make the right decision for you.
How to get even more income during retirement
Social Security plays a key role in your financial security, but it's not the only way to boost your retirement income. In our brand-new free report, our retirement experts give their insight on a simple strategy to take advantage of a little-known IRS rule that can help ensure a more comfortable retirement for you and your family. Click here to get your copy today.
The article Social Security: Don't Let the "Returns" of Waiting Mislead You originally appeared on Fool.com.Dan Caplinger and The Motley Fool have no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.