A few months ago, JP Morgan Chase tried to initiate a Twitter meme known as #AskJPM. It was a strategic part of Twitter's initial public offering, for which JP Morgan had been the lead underwriter. The social media campaign was meant to give eager undergraduates a chance to talk directly to the bank's legendary vice-chairman and dealmaker, Jimmy Lee.
But things didn't go as planned.
Instead of inquires about career paths, the Tweets were loaded with thinly veiled (and some not-so-thinly veiled) animosity toward America's largest bank. McDonald's faced a similar fiasco in 2012 when the company sought out tributes on Twitter using the hashtag #McDStories. Of course, both these incidents were relatively small PR mishaps, but the real question is how much does a company's overall public image affect their earnings?
For banks like JP Morgan, the answer depends on which business segment you're talking about.
Consumer & Community Banking
There is evidence to suggest, unsurprisingly, that when banks gain a high degree of confidence from their clients, customer loyalty will quickly follow. A Gallup report shows that when consumers rate their levels of confidence in a bank, those with more faith in their banks are actually less likely to switch banks based on cost considerations alone. On the other hand, "low-trust customers switched because of better fees, prices, and products from other banks."But as seen below, a plurality of Americans, regardless of their age, do not have enough confidence in their primary bank.
In fact, Gallup suggests that a "good score" could be achieved if 50% of respondents felt a "great deal of loyalty", so we're way off the mark.
The data also points to increased skepticism among baby boomers, which is troubling considering how American demographics are changing. Baby boomers represent the largest share of banking customers and "[29%] of them have more than a $100, 000 in investable household assets, compared with 19% of Generation X and 12% of Generation Y".
None of this is to say that baby boomers are going to suddenly flee JP Morgan if the company has a bad press day, but it does mean that a coveted demographic can be poached if another bank offers them a better deal. And while JP Morgan does offer a better selection of products than its competitors, the company is vulnerable to a pricing offensive. Here's their report card on customer satisfaction relative-to-their-peers.
In comparison to the flashiness of investment banking, good ol' banking products like credit cards and automobile financing may seem staid, but they're proven cash cows.
In 2013, JP Morgan Chase's consumer side hauled in $10.7 billion of net income on a revenue base of $46 billion, as opposed to the investment bank's $8.5 billion on $34.2 billion. For those keeping score, that's a return on equity (ROE) of 23% and 15%, respectively.
Despite the numbers, it's unlikely that JP Morgan Chase will pivot to a consumer banking strategy unless they're forced to, so what's the likelihood of that happening? Actually, it might surprise you.
Trading vs. Banking
A number of JP Morgan's rivals, including Morgan Stanley , Credit Suisse , and Barclays , have announced major staff cuts to their investment bank divisions.The moves come amid lower trading revenues across the industry, raising questions about the long term viability of trading as a key profit center.
That's why Marianne Lake, JP Morgan's CFO, warned investors that second quarter fixed income and equities trading would be 20% lower than the same period last year.
While Ms. Lake denied that the slump would be permanent, she admitted that "it is possible that reductions may be required in response to market evolution, but it will take time to play out". Translation: In case I'm wrong and trading profits don't rebound, we may have to consider that investment banking will be of less strategic importance than in recent years.
I, for one, don't believe that the clever folks who run these banks are just going to sit back and see their bottom lines recede.
They will move to expand in whatever capacity remains available to them. JP Morgan is an age-old institution that houses some of the cleverest people in finance so it wouldn't surprise me if they're cautiously prepared for Morgan Stanley, Credit Suisse, and Barclays to attack on the wealth management and consumer banking fronts.
For the moment, JP Morgan's public image appears to have little effect on the company's performance for one reason: the entire banking industry is in the same boat. Although, if one or two prominent banks change the field of competition to consumer banking, the logjam of mistrust will be broken. The business model of banking could undergo yet another transformation to a system that depends heavily on the relationship between banks and customers. But that day is not today.
Bank of America + Apple? This device makes it possible.
Apple recently recruited a secret-development "dream team" to guarantee its newest smart device was kept hidden from the public for as long as possible. But the secret is out, and some early viewers are claiming its destined to change everything from banking to health care. In fact, ABI Research predicts 485 million of this type of device will be sold per year. But one small company makes Apple's gadget possible. And its stock price has nearly unlimited room to run for early in-the-know investors. To be one of them, and see Apple's newest smart gizmo, just click here!
The article Is JP Morgan Chase's Public Image Hurting Their Bottom Line? originally appeared on Fool.com.Gaurav Seetharam has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool owns shares of JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.