General Motors Co. To Recall 1.3 Million Vehicles to Repair Steering
David McNew/Getty Images
By Julia Edwards, Eric Beech and Karl Plume

WASHINGTON and CHICAGO -- Retired Wisconsin state trooper Keith Young and his wife were sitting at the kitchen table last month when a story on the evening news jarred them: General Motors (GM) was recalling 1.6 million vehicles for faulty ignition switches.

Young said the couple turned to each other immediately. "That's just like that crash over in St. Croix County in 2006," they said.

The October 2006 crash of a Chevrolet Cobalt stayed with Young, who spent 20 years as a specialist in accident reconstruction. The car, driven by 17-year-old Megan Ungar-Kerns, lurched and hit a telephone box and two trees. No airbags deployed, and her two passengers were killed. None was wearing a seatbelt.

Young sent a report to the U.S. vehicle safety agency, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, with his finding that the ignition had been turned from "run" to the "accessory" position prior to the crash, shutting off the car's engine and disabling the airbags.

But NHTSA, which is responsible for keeping dangerous vehicles off the road, didn't act until after the GM recall in February of this year, when the agency began investigating the timeliness of the automaker's handling of the safety defects.

The agency now finds itself under intense scrutiny for failing to spot a defect blamed for at least 12 deaths since 2005.

Consumer safety groups say NHTSA should have pressured GM to order a recall as early as 2007. The agency's acting chief, David Friedman, has been called to testify before a House of Representatives panel in April looking into whether NHTSA failed to heed warning signs. A Senate panel is also planning hearings.

Feds Say Reports 'Inconclusive'

Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx, whose sprawling department oversees NHTSA, has defended the agency, saying data about the ignition switch from was "inconclusive."

"It just didn't point to an investigation" by NHTSA, he said, describing the broad probe that companies fear.

That evidence included two reports completed in 2006 and 2007 by outside investigators hired by NHTSA. The reports zeroed in, as Young had, on the ignition problem.

Both were the results of so-called Special Crash Investigations,
which the agency initiates when it wants to take a deeper dive into accidents and their underlying causes, to help see if a wider NHTSA investigation is warranted.

After the 2006 Wisconsin crash, the Chevrolet Cobalt driven by Megan Ungar-Kerns, now Megan Phillips, was taken to an impound lot. Former state trooper Young met a NHTSA contractor from Indiana University and shared his findings. "I made them aware," he said.

The team from Indiana University searched NHTSA's own database in 2006 and found at least six consumer complaints of the ignition switch cutting off the engine. Their report included a service bulletin GM had sent to its dealers in October 2006 alerting them to the defective part.

"This investigation revealed that inadvertent contact with the ignition switch or a key chain in the 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt can in fact result in engine shut-down and loss of power," the report said.

An earlier Special Crash Investigation report, begun in 2005 and completed in 2006 by Calspan, focused on a July 2005 accident in Maryland that killed 16-year-old Amber Marie Rose, whose airbag failed to deploy after her Chevrolet Cobalt hit a tree at about 69 mph.

Investigators said the ignition key was in the "accessory" position. Rose wasn't wearing a seat belt and was legally drunk at the time of the accident, according to the report.

Despite the two reports by outside investigators that drew similar conclusions, NHTSA didn't move to open a formal investigation.

If NHTSA had taken that step, it might have put pressure on GM to consider a recall, said retired NHTSA attorney Allan Kam, who has been hired as an expert by a plaintiff's attorney in a lawsuit against GM. Kam said it would be "a fair criticism" to say the agency needs better internal coordination.

General Motors says it first learned about the ignition defect in 2001. The automaker says the weight of the key ring or jostling of the key can cause the ignition to shut off suddenly, and the company has apologized repeatedly for its slow response. It has launched an internal probe.

NHTSA said in a statement that in both Special Crash Investigations the results were inconclusive.

"In this case, the data available to NHTSA at the time did not contain sufficient evidence of a possible safety defect trend that would warrant the agency opening a formal investigation," the agency said.

'More Than Enough Information'

On Friday, Transportation Secretary Foxx said "out of an abundance of caution" he had asked the department's inspector general to review whether NHTSA had properly investigated reports of ignition problems.

Some consumer groups say the conclusion is clear.

"They had more than enough information," said Clarence Ditlow, executive director of the independent Center for Auto Safety. "They could have issued a recall as early as 2007."

The center conducted a study analyzing all fatal accidents in 2003-2007 Saturn Ions and 2005-2007 Chevrolet Cobalts and found that in 303 front-end collisions, the airbag didn't deploy. GM called the report "pure speculation."

With a staff of 600, NHTSA has struggled to uphold its mandate of policing auto manufacturers over dangerous defects at a time when advanced electronics make today's cars more complex, safety advocates say.

"The agency is certainly understaffed and outgunned," said Sean Kane, founder of Safety Research & Strategies Inc and a regular expert witness for plaintiffs lawyers. Still, Kane said he found the agency's actions in the GM case "hard to fathom" given the amount of information available to it.

NHTSA has faced criticism before for its oversight. It came under fire for waiting to open an investigation into blowouts of Firestone tires in Ford Explorers until 2000, about 10 years after initial reports of accidents. That controversy prompted Congress to pass the TREAD Act, which ordered manufacturers to report additional information on defects to NHTSA, much of which isn't made public.

NHTSA has several databases it uses to find patterns in reports of defects. The Early Warning Reporting system draws from information supplied by manufacturers on deaths and injuries. The Fatal Accident Reporting System is based on police reports. Those tools, and the 40,000 complaints NHTSA receives each year, are used by the agency to spot a defect or enough of a pattern to warrant further investigation.

The tools also provided the data that the Center for Auto Safety used for some of its reports.

Flat Airbags

Even if NHTSA found the data inconclusive, others investigating crashes were suspicious.

Tennessee state trooper Michael Marvin immediately noticed something unusual when he was called to the scene of an accident on New Year's Eve 2009, and he looked inside a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt that had hit a tree. Inside, he found the body of Hasaya Chansuthus, a 25-year-old woman who was killed upon impact with no airbags to cushion the blow.

"If you hit something head on like that -- and it wasn't a really old car -- the airbags should have deployed," Marvin said.

And a mechanic who earlier this year looked at a 2006 Chevrolet Cobalt owned by Walter Luba also noticed a problem. Luba, of Mount Morris, Ill., had the car looked at after an incident in which it suddenly locked up, hitting a snow bank and flipping into oncoming traffic.

He escaped and survived. His neighborhood mechanic later told him it was a power loss to the engine that caused his wheels to lock, and Luba has since confirmed his car was included in the recall.

For former state trooper Young, the evidence was there all along.

"I'm not here to critique their work. I'm here to do my job," Young said of federal regulators. "When I detected something that was a little unusual, I passed that information on, and it apparently took them 8 or 10 years."

-Additional reporting by Ben Klayman and Paul Lienert in Detroit, Marilyn Thompson in Washington.


GM Vehicle Safety Leader Speaks Up

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Value Investing

Are you the next Warren Buffett?

View Course »

Goal Setting

Want to succeed? Then you need goals!

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

55 Comments

Filter by:
Jim Anderson

I wrote an article on Toyota claims about the carpet several years ago when the CHP officer was killed. I was called names for blaming Toyota... Guess what, Toyota proved me correct. I tested something similar on auto computer controlled cars years ago. Unless there is adequate software safeguards AND the complete use of Fiber optic cables for data plus shielding, I will not ride in a Toyota product or any car with computer controlled steering. It saves manufacturing costs but copper wires are antennae and auto computers are controlled by an electronic clock. ANY EMI or RFI can disrupt that communication between the driver and the controller. You ain't seen nothing yet. I fear driving anything I have little mechanical control over such as the doors being locked when the key is turned on with NO override... No only that, I see no test of susceptibility to EMI and RFI. Unsafe at any speed is the truth behind a LOT of automobile. Take Lexus, they have an "auto ON lamp" feature (as others do). Great idea BUT in rain, the BACK lights are OFF, the same for Honda!!! Test YOUR car if you have that auto ON crap, you could easily be rear-ended!!!

March 24 2014 at 12:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jim Anderson's comment
alfredschrader

Not to worry, I get my auto mentoring from Super Dave Osbourne the developer of garbothane.

March 24 2014 at 7:26 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jim Anderson

I own several GM products. If one hangs 35 pounds of crap on a key ring, what do you expect! Any idiot should see that pulls down on the switch. I asked a friend what she thought "I removed everything except the fob and the house key YEARS ago!!! My personal opinion: U cannot fix stupid. I suspect the same individuals do not use seat belts, load the car with trash, and would love to drive with the door open.

March 24 2014 at 12:02 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
flyingfortresb17

It is not laughable enough that the court system allows the Corporations to bury product defects when agreements are reached before during or after a court case. All deadly defects need immediate disclosure and those with serious injury should be made upon the second case mandating notice to the public. Any withholding should be a second degree felony with serious injury and a first degree with a death.

March 23 2014 at 11:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mr. ROC

This is really a sad story. Totally preventable....this is the saddest part. The CEO's of GM should have to drive one of their products. The CEO's of chemical plans should have to live down wind from their factories.

March 23 2014 at 11:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
velville

I still remember the metallic sticker that was sent by Mercury Div. that warned of the transmission jumping from Park to Reverse. 1980 Mercury Bobcat.................just put the warning sticker on your dashboard and everything will be fine! GM is not the only company that has taken shortcuts......The question is: What will America do to stop Americans from applying shortcuts?

March 23 2014 at 8:26 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
aevf101

Gument Regulators what a freaking joke. I spent eight yearsin the US NAVY as an aviation electrician. We had "regulators" called the Quality Control Division or "QC". These were guys that were sent from different workcenters to inspect the work the techs and mechanics performed on the aircraft. Mostly these guys we didn't want in our work centers. They were either hard to get along with or they didn't know beans about what they were doing when it came to troubleshooting and repair of the aircraft systems, or both. They were the dregs, get 'em out of the shop and out of the way.

It doesn't surprise me that this ignition switch problem got past a lot of the "regulators". Most gument regulators want to CTOA first and the rest of the show is just for show.

March 23 2014 at 7:55 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bakeland

As a said perviously, the coded RFID insert key inserted downward positively into the console is the answer.

Currently high amperage currents pass theough relectrical contacts and mechanical detents that wear a little more with each use and age, like the old rotary contact tuners on old vintage TV's.

Just think about the very low switching voltages on your iPhone, desktop computer, TV or any other electronic device. These on/off buttons seldom go out. and last for years.

Gravity acting on a heavy key chani attached to "key" inserted downward in a well in the console.would hold it in, until which time the ket is intentionally removed.

March 23 2014 at 7:42 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
alfredschrader

There's another one brewing - that new automatic braking system.
Say you're cruising along and there is a 10 ton cement mixer truck behind you.
An opposum jumps out and the system jambs on the brake. You become spam in a can.

March 23 2014 at 7:02 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to alfredschrader's comment
betty_brock

YIKES, my new car has that.

March 23 2014 at 9:11 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
crrunch

It's an incredibly sad fact that it sat with NO action because not enough poeple were hurt or dead. Again, dollars won over ethics and responsibility. If they want Americans to buy American, they to buck up, say they missed the mark, and take care of it without being told they have to by anyone else. It's called integrity.

March 23 2014 at 6:55 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
potmind

Vehicle safety bureaucrats never actually look at the products, instead reading paperwork. Bureaucrats' pay rate is determined by Congress Ukazes. Congress membership is paid by Manufacturers' lobbies' election funds. Aside from that, there is absolutely no conflict of interest.

March 23 2014 at 5:44 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply