- Days left

The Astoundingly Lucrative Tax Loophole That Only Lawyers Can Use

Wooden gavel barrister,scale of justice and golden coins
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers."
-- Dick the Butcher, Henry VI

In 1591, Shakespeare wrote these words as part of the dialogue for one of his great historical plays, "Henry VI" -- and in the four centuries since, the public's view of the legal profession has, if anything, gotten worse.

In fact, lawyers consistently rank near the top of Gallup's annual poll of the most hated professions. The only other profession that regularly ranks higher (meaning lower) is being a member of Congress, of which -- insert irony alert here -- 43 percent list their occupation as "law."

Much of the public's dislike of lawyers stems from the perception that they don't uphold the law so much as manipulate the it to their own interests and those of their clients -- truth be damned. But that is a debate for another venue, and though I hate to pour fuel on the lawyer-bashing fire -- well, not really -- there is a special tax loophole which only lawyers can use, and when you learn about it, chances are you will think even less of them.

Billable Hours or Contingency

Lawyers generally charge their clients in one of two different ways: either at a set rate for each billable hour of work done, or on contingency. The way contingency works is that the lawyers agree not to charge the client anything unless they win a settlement for him, in which case they get a percentage of that settlement -- on average about 40 percent.

This means that a lawyer on contingency who sues a company on behalf of a client and wins a settlement of $1 million will receive $400,000 as compensation. And that amount can be set aside, in a tax-deferred account, for as long as the lawyer wishes, and then only taxed on the income and profits in the years that the payments are received from that account.

Yes, you heard me right.

The Internal Revenue Service challenged this arrangement in a 1996 landmark case, Childs v. Commissioner, but lost in a 11th Circuit Court decision. There initially was concern that the IRS would eventually challenge the ruling, but since then, according to Robert Wood, an expert on taxation judgments, "the IRS has begun uniformly citing Childs favorably and is apparently quite comfortable with it."

Tax-Deferred for as Long as They Want

So thanks to the Childs ruling, lawyers enjoy a unique tax advantage unavailable to average citizens, which includes
  • The ability to invest their contingency fees pre-tax, which allows 100 percent of their money to earn tax-deferred interest.
  • The flexibility to spread out their income over a longer period of time, ideally into years when they fall into a lower tax bracket.
  • Timing the future payments from their contingency fees to coincide with major expenditures, such as college tuition, retirement and so on.

And unlike tax-deferred instruments such as a 401(k), which limit the annual pre-tax contribution to $17,500, there is no limit to the amount of contingency fees that a lawyer can defer.

So, as an example, if a lawyer were to receive $1 million in contingency fees in a given year, putting him in the top tax bracket, he could defer paying taxes on 100 percent of that by placing it in a structured annuity.

He could then schedule payments in any amount, and at any time in the future.

So, if a decade later he were to take a year off from his practice, theoretically earning no income, he could schedule $200,000 of that $1 million (plus accumulated interest) to be realized, putting him in a lower tax rate and thus dramatically lowering his original tax liability.

Certainly this tax loophole is just another reason that most people will continue to look at the legal profession with disdain. But don't take it lying down. If you find this preferential tax treatment outrageous, like I do, pick of the phone, call your local member of congress and voice your opinion. And just hope that your congressperson is part of the other 57 percent.

No man is an island, or even a peninsula, so I encourage your feedback in the comments below. And don't forget to pick up my book, "Trading: The Best of the Best -- Top Trading Tips for Our Time".

More from Brian Lund

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Building Credit from Scratch

Start building credit...now.

View Course »

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Tax Aspects of Home Ownership: Selling a Home

Though most home-sale profit is now tax-free, there are still steps you can take to maximize the tax benefits of selling your home. Learn how to figure your gain, factoring in your basis, home improvements and more.

What is Form 1095-C: Employer-Provided Health Insurance Offer and Coverage

The Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, requires certain employers to offer health insurance coverage to full-time employees and their dependents. Further, those employers must send an annual statement to all employees eligible for coverage describing the insurance available to them. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) created Form 1095-C to serve as that statement.

What is IRS Form 8379: Injured Spouse Allocation

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has the power to seize income tax refunds when a taxpayer owes certain debts, such as unpaid taxes or overdue child support. Sometimes, a married couple's joint tax refund will be seized because of a debt for which only one spouse is responsible. When that happens, the other spouse is said to be "injured" and can file Form 8379 to get at least some of the refund.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:

Having been paid for many years by lawyers, I have to agree some of them are awful. However many of them are loving and generous. This "loophole" is seeing a lot of lawyers who worked for six months to a year (without pay) to win a settlement for a client, oftentimes advancing the client a lot of money for evidence, a lot of pleadings, and a lot of interrogatories (meetings where both sides ask questions of the parties to avoid lengthy court hearings) and other expenses to see the case through to settlement., have a way of evening out their income so that the taxes aren't exorbitant. I believe a lot of lawyers with such annuities are using them now to survive, as the legal business isn't seeing a lot of business these days! Most gung ho attorneys straight out of law school have their hearts in the right place. They want to help people. Often they see the bottom line, which is if you don't have enough money to see your client through to a just settlement or outcome of a trial, you have to pass them by. In other words they fall of their "white horses". I've seen many fall and a few get back on. Sometimes they bill for an hour when they've talked with a client for four hours. The moral of the story "don't put people in boxes to hate just because of what they do for a living."

February 21 2014 at 3:23 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Hello, Gorgeous!

Would your like some cheese with your whine? And, it could be argued that members of Congress are inside traders. Explain why most, if not all, members of Congress go in wealthy and come out (usually carried out) extremely wealthy. Anyone with reasonable intelligence can become a lawyer. Why don't you? I am pretty sick and tired of people pointing the finger at someone else and crying, "That's not fair! He has something that I don't have!" Of course the whining fools don't realize that the reason they don't have what the awful other guy has is because the fool just sits around picking his nose expecting it to fall in his lap. If you don't have "it" and you want it, then why don't you go out and get it? Lawyers spend a hell of a lot of time, effort and money to become lawyers. When someone works hard to achieve success why shouldn't they be rewarded for their efforts? The thing is, everybody hates lawyers until they need one. Then the lawyer is your new best friend. And as bad as you think lawyers may be, what about doctors? They take money from sick people. How low is that?

February 21 2014 at 11:07 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply


February 21 2014 at 10:34 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply