Why This Company Is the Best Soda Play

As consumers become increasingly health conscious, they are shifting from classic colas produced by Coca-Cola and PepsiCo to low- or zero-calorie drink options. This bodes well for SodaStream , a manufacturer and distributor of homemade soda makers. With SodaStream's soda makers, soda drinkers can get their daily dose of soda with two-thirds less carbohydrates, calories, and sugar than their regular off-the-shelf counterparts. SodaStream isn't just a great product for consumers--it is also an attractive investment play on the at-home soda market.

Market penetration
The growth rate of any company is largely a function of industry growth and market share gains, particularly the former. The U.S. of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) market is a very mature market. Since the time the first bottle of Coke was sold in the U.S. in 1886, almost everyone in the country has drank at least a soda in his lifetime. This places a natural cap on how many more cans of soda Coca-Cola and PepsiCo can sell every year.

On the other hand, SodaStream estimates that the U.S. household penetration rate for home carbonation systems is at a low 1.1%. With Sweden's penetration rate estimated at 25%, there is ample room for SodaStream to grow further.     


Revenue stability
Traditionally, soda drinkers have been fiercely loyal to their chosen brands. For example, when Coca-Cola replaced its classic Coke with a new formulated version in 1985, the backlash from its customers forced it to relaunch its classic Coke within months.

However, with the health and wellness trend contributing to lower CSD sales in recent years, it seems that while consumers have their favorite soda brand, there is nothing to stop them from switching away from sodas altogether. The key is that every soda sale is a one-off transaction -- Coca-Cola and PepsiCo must keep selling the same number of products every year to maintain the same revenue level as the previous year.

In comparison, SodaStream operates on a classic razor and razor blade revenue model. As SodaStream's installed base of customers who bought its soda makers grows, recurring sales of consumables such as carbonation bottles, carbon dioxide refills, and flavors will also increase in tandem. Based on September 2013 year-to-date data, sales of soda-maker units increased 47% year over year, but refill units and flavor units were up by 265% and 139%, respectively. This set of financial numbers is indicative of the annuity-like and highly profitable nature of consumable sales.

Price insensitivity
Price competition and the proliferation of private labels have dented the profitability of many consumer-product companies. However, soda seems to be a unique product category, where consumers are willing to pay more when they find something that suits their taste.

Unlike product categories like packaged food, personal care, and home care, private labels haven't made much headway in taking business away from the branded beverage giants. As of year-end 2012, Coca-Cola and PepsiCo still have a combined 70% market share of the U.S. CSDs market. In contrast, products from Cott, the country's largest private-label beverage company, accounted for a mere 4.7% of the entire market. This is the strongest indication that soda drinkers are relatively price insensitive.

Furthermore, true to the razor and razor blade model, SodaStream's Fountain Jet soda maker is affordable at less than $100, with the margins made on the "blades" and not the "razor." For example, Switzerland, a more developed home-soda market, boasts of an operating margin in excess of 25% because of a product mix tilted toward consumables (82%).

On the other hand, the U.S. operating margin is significantly lower, at 5% for SodaStream, because sales are split almost evenly between soda makers and consumables. Therefore, SodaStream will benefit from margin expansion going forward, as an increased number of higher-margin consumables are sold.

Foolish final thoughts
With Coca-Cola and PepsiCo suffering from lower CSD volumes, SodaStream is a much more attractive play on the soda market because of its superior growth prospects. In addition, SodaStream has a superior business model vis-à-vis Coca-Cola and PepsiCo, resulting in stable revenue streams and profit margins.

 

The article Why This Company Is the Best Soda Play originally appeared on Fool.com.

Mark Lin has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and SodaStream. The Motley Fool owns shares of Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, and SodaStream. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2014 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Value Investing

Are you the next Warren Buffett?

View Course »

Managing your Portfolio

Keeping your portfolio and financial life fit!

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:
jjmtprospect

Unless Sodastream can get the ability to sell syrups that come directly from a consumer's favorite manufacturer, they will have a hard time drawing consumers that have brand preference. That is why I as a consumer probably would not purchase their machine, and if I did, it would probably wind up in the back of my closet along with the bread maker, juicer, etc, as I would go back to the product I prefer after trying the Sodastream product and realizing it does not taste as good (or the same as) as my favorite. The major soda companies would have no interest in selling their syrups to Sodastream - that would only dilute their profits. So why would a consumer want to buy a product that isn't as 'good' as what they already have available? And with the necessary upfront cost of equipment just to try the product? I cannot imagine that I am the only consumer that has brand preference for a beverage, so an investment in this company would carry considerable more risk, and so far this company doesn't offer a dividend to its shareholders. And yes, I do hold stock in the company that produces my favorite beverages

January 21 2014 at 7:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply