Jobless Bill Stalls in Senate

Unemployment Politics
Pablo Martinez Monsivais/APSenate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

WASHINGTON -- Legislation to resurrect long-term jobless legislation stalled in the Senate on Thursday, triggering angry recriminations from both sides of the political aisle despite earlier expressions of optimism that benefits might soon be restored for more than 1 million victims of the recession.

Gridlock asserted itself after majority Democrats offered to pay for a 10-month extension of a scaled-back program of benefits -- then refused to permit Republicans even to seek any changes.

Instead, Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., accused Republicans of "continually denigrating our economy, our president and frankly, I believe, our country."

Sen. Dan Coats of Indiana, one of a half-dozen Republicans who helped advance the bill over an initial hurdle earlier in the week, said he hadn't been consulted. Echoing complaints by other members of his party, he said that under Reid's leadership he has been relegated to the sidelines. He added that Indiana voters "didn't send me here to be told just to sit down and forget it."

At issue was a struggle over the possible resurrection of a program that expired on Dec. 28, immediately cutting off benefits of roughly $256 weekly for more than 1.3 million hurt by the recession.

The measure is the first to come before the Senate in the election year, and since Monday has become ground zero of a competition between the political parties to appeal to hard-hit victims of the longest recession in more than a half-century.

While unemployment has receded in recent months, long-term jobless is high by historical standards.

At midday Thursday, Reid had expressed optimism about the chances for compromise,
and Democratic officials said talks with Republicans were focused on a scaled-back program that is fully paid for and would provide up to 31 weeks of benefits for the long-term unemployed.

The officials said the proposal would run through the late fall, and the price tag -- approximately $18 billion -- would be offset through cuts elsewhere in the budget so deficits would not rise.

Reid told reporters he was "cautiously optimistic" about a compromise emerging later in the day, and said he had held meetings with fellow Nevadan Dean Heller, a Republican, but provided no details.

But midafternoon, when Reid formally outlined the proposal, there was no evident Republican support for it, and each side accused the other of an unwillingness to compromise.

The expired law provided a maximum of 47 weeks of payments after an unemployed worker has exhausted state-funded benefits, usually 26 weeks.

The new measure would reduce the 47 weeks to a maximum of 31 weeks, officials said, based on a sliding scale that dates to the expired program.

Officials said the first tier of additional benefits would be six weeks, and be generally available to all who have used up their state eligibility.

They said an additional six weeks would be available in states where unemployment is 6 percent or higher; an additional nine weeks in states with joblessness of 7 percent or higher; and 10 more weeks in states where unemployment is 9 percent or more.

The cost would be offset in part by extending a previously approved reduction in Medicare payments to providers, officials said, and in part by limiting or eliminating the ability of individuals on Social Security disability from also receiving unemployment benefits.

The officials who described the details of the possible legislation did so on condition of anonymity, saying they weren't authorized to speak on the record.

Currently, Nevada and Rhode Island are the only states with unemployment of 9 percent.

Senators from the two states -- Democrat Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Heller of Nevada -- were central to the talks, and the White House was also being kept apprised.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., told reporters that administration officials have indicated they would be satisfied with a deal that won the backing of Senate Democrats.

Any legislation that clears the Senate would also have to pass the House, where Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, has said he is only willing to consider an extension of the expired program that is fully paid for.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How much house can I afford

Home buying 101, evaluating one of your most important financial decisions.

View Course »

How to Buy a Car

How to get the best deal and buy a car with confidence.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

It's time for dear old Harry Reid to go back to Navada. He is the problem with Washington Politics. The old ways don't work but the people keep sending him back again and again to keep making the same mistakes. We need term limits set by the people the the politicians or the 2 currupt parties.

January 10 2014 at 8:53 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Didn't take me that long to find a job after I got laid off from a plant closure up in Wisconsin, only took me 3 weeks to find a good paying job, decided to sell my house and move to say we got family we can't do that, sure you can just get off your lazy ass and do it, adapt to change move on, go where the jobs are that fit your work experience just get up and go no one forces you to stay in one place forever, just admit it America your getting lazier by the day.

January 10 2014 at 12:09 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

Those bastards can not do ANYTHING thats right for America, but they can pass corporate America welfare quick fast and in a hurry...we will not forget.

January 09 2014 at 6:41 PM Report abuse +4 rate up rate down Reply

Politicians are the only people in the world who create problems and then campaign against them.

and we re-elect 90% of them when they have a 5% job approval rating...why?
we pay them six figures and benefits for life...why?

January 09 2014 at 6:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Unemployment benefits should be cut back the original 13 weeks. If you can't get your act together and get another job in that time period, don't expect me or any other American to pay for your ineptness or laziness.

January 09 2014 at 5:47 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

if you cant find a job in this booming economy lol you might as well go on wellfare

January 09 2014 at 2:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to richw555's comment

why not everyone go on welfare and food stamps? why work at all? what fun!

January 09 2014 at 6:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply