During the first quarter of 2014, Intel is slated to launch its next generation system-on-chip platform for smartphones known as Merrifield. According to estimates based on Intel's statements at its recent investor day meeting, this platform will be a solid performer (at what is likely to be great power consumption), but it will probably slightly lag (in terms of peak performance, not necessarily sustained performance) the best from Qualcomm at the time.
More importantly, Qualcomm's top-end chip is marketable as a quad core processor while Merrifield sports a dual core. While this does look like a marketing "disaster," Intel has one trump card that it can play to completely turn the marketing tides.
64-bit is the new buzzword
When Apple announced that its A7 chip in the new iPhone 5s was 64-bit, it seemed that the race to "64-bit" was on. Samsung was out claiming that it would have a 64-bit phone next year, and Qualcomm even went so far as to tout its low-end 64-bit chip (fully cognizant of the fact that the company is throwing its higher-end, higher-performing chips under the bus). In short, the majority of the handset vendors were in a frenzy to get 64-bit parts out the door as soon as possible.
Intel has 64-bit, but can it capitalize?
Intel has long been viewed as a "laggard" in the smartphone chip space, and this view isn't off-base. However, the nice thing about this frenzied rush to 64-bit is that Intel's mobile processors are all 64-bit capable today. The only hurdle to shipping handsets and tablets with this 64-bit marketing point has been operating system support. Android, the operating system with over 80% global market share, is currently a 32-bit operating system.
Now, it seems from Qualcomm's announcements (rushing to announce a low end 64-bit chip that won't actually ship until the second half of 2014) that Intel will be the lone provider of high-end 64-bit smartphone chips for most of, if not all of, 2014. If Intel can capitalize on this marketing point next year with some of the partners that it has been very public about (Lenovo, Motorola/Google), then Intel could gain a real marketing advantage.
It's all about Android-64 at this point
Intel's hardware is already there - it's 64-bit and ready to go. The only question now is Android support. Interestingly enough, Intel already showed off its current generation tablet chip running a 64-bit version of Android. While it's probably not quite ready for primetime, the odds are good that Intel will enable a number of key partners (perhaps a Google Nexus tablet) with the "world's first" 64-bit Android devices before anybody else. If Intel can pull this off, not only does it win the marketing accolades, but this helps to solidify X86 as not just a viable alternative to the ARM instruction set, but as potentially a leader as the first 64-bit native applications will be written for Intel first.
Foolish bottom line
Admittedly, Intel probably won't have an incredibly large window of opportunity to capitalize on the 64-bit "craze," but if it can get a year's head start and some design wins thanks to this opportunity, this helps to clear the path to more design wins going forward as Intel's product lineup improves.
Looking for growth to go with Intel's income?
While Intel is a relatively safe investment with a nice dividend, many investors are looking for the next "big" tech stock to help them get insanely rich. Such opportunities exist, and our chief technology officer believes he's found one. In this free report, Jeremy Phillips shares the single company that he believes could transform not only your portfolio, but your entire life. To learn the identity of this stock for free and see why Jeremy is putting more than $100,000 of his own money into it, all you have to do is click here now.
The article Intel's Trump Card originally appeared on Fool.com.Ashraf Eassa owns shares of Intel. The Motley Fool recommends Apple and Intel. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Intel, and Qualcomm. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.