Federal Reserve Cuts Bond-Buying but Stresses Easy Policy

Bernanke
Jacquelyn Martin/APFederal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke.
By Jonathan Spicer
and Jason Lange


WASHINGTON -- The Federal Reserve has embarked on the risky task of winding down the era of easy money, saying the U.S. economy was finally strong enough for it to start scaling down its massive bond-buying stimulus.

The central bank Wednesday modestly trimmed the pace of its monthly asset purchases, by $10 billion to $75 billion, and sought to temper the long-awaited move by suggesting its key interest rate would stay at rock bottom even longer than previously promised.

At his last scheduled news conference as Fed chairman, Ben Bernanke said the purchases would likely be cut at a "measured" pace through much of next year if job gains continued as expected, with the program fully shuttered by late-2014.

The move, which surprised some investors but did not cause the market shock many had feared, was a nod to better prospects for the economy and labor market. It marked a historic turning point for the largest monetary policy experiment ever.

"The recovery clearly remains far from complete,"
Bernanke said. But "we're hopeful ... we'll begin to see the whites of the eyes of the end of the recovery, and the beginning of the more normal period of economic growth."

Bernanke said he consulted closely on the decision with Fed Vice Chair Janet Yellen, who is set to succeed him once he steps down on Jan. 31 after eight years at the helm. "She fully supports what we did today," he said.

Investors took the action as a validation that the outlook for the economy was improving. After a brief pullback, U.S. stocks rallied sharply, with both S&P 500 and Dow industrials closing at all-time highs.

At the same time, U.S. Treasury bond prices fell, but the move was modest, capped by the Fed's strengthened commitment to keep interest rates near zero for a long time irrespective of the reduction in its asset purchases.

The Fed said monthly purchases of both mortgage and Treasury bonds would be trimmed by $5 billion each, starting in January.

"This is a modest change, not a big one, and it shows that they are not in a rush," said Scott Clemons, chief investment strategist for Brown Brothers Harriman Wealth Management. "The Fed is using very careful language that they are going to continue to support the economy."

End of an Era

The Fed's extraordinary money-printing has helped drive stocks to record highs and sparked sharp gyrations in foreign currencies, including a drop in emerging markets earlier this year as investors anticipated an end to the easing.

"They finally pulled a Band-Aid off that they've been tugging at for a long time," said Rick Meckler, president of hedge fund LibertyView Capital Management in Jersey City, N.J.

The Fed launched its third and latest round of quantitative easing, or QE, 15 months ago to kick-start hiring and growth in an economy recovering only slowly from the recession. Its first program was launched during the 2008 financial crisis.

The central bank's asset purchase programs, a centerpiece of its crisis-era policy, have left it holding roughly $4 trillion of bonds, and the path it must follow in dialing it down is rife with numerous risks, including the possibility of higher-than-targeted interest rates and a loss of investor confidence.

To soothe investors' nerves, the Fed said it "likely will be appropriate" to keep overnight rates near zero "well past the time" that the jobless rate falls below 6.5 percent, especially if inflation expectations remain below target.

The Fed has held rates near zero since late 2008.

It was a noteworthy tweak to an earlier pledge to keep benchmark credit costs steady at least until the jobless rate, which dropped to a five-year low of 7 percent in November, hits 6.5 percent.

"The actions today are intended to keep the level of accommodation the same overall," said Bernanke, who held out the prospect of fresh stimulus if the economy stumbled. He said officials could further bolster their low-rate pledge, or even cut the interest rate they pay banks on excess reserves held at the Fed in a bid to spur lending.

Expectations on Inflation, Rates

In fresh quarterly forecasts, the central bank lowered its expectations for both inflation and unemployment over the next few years, acknowledging the jobless rate had fallen more quickly than expected. It now sees it reaching a range of 6.3 percent to 6.6 percent by the end of 2014, from a previous prediction of 6.4 percent to 6.8 percent.

Three policymakers expect the first rate rise to come in 2016, up from only two in September, while 12 of the Fed's 17 top officials still see the move in 2015. Futures markets do not see better-than-even odds of a rate hike until September 2015.

Critics of the bond buying, including some Fed officials, have worried the program could unleash inflation or fuel hard-to-detect asset price bubbles.

But some have credited the purchases with stabilizing an economy and banking system that had been crippled by the 2008 financial crisis and with staving off what could have been a damaging cycle of deflation.

One policymaker, Eric Rosengren of the Boston Fed, dissented against the decision, which he felt was premature given the still-high unemployment rate.

Bernanke stressed the Fed was not giving up on supporting the economy, and said it would take action if inflation failed to rise to the central bank's 2 percent target. Inflation as measured by the Fed's preferred price gauge rose just 0.7 percent in the 12 months through October.

Even so, recent growth in jobs, retail sales and housing, as well as a fresh budget deal in Congress, had convinced a growing number of economists the Fed would trim the bond purchases.

But many thought the central bank would wait until early in the new year, given persistently low inflation and the fact that the world's largest economy has stumbled several times in its crawl out of the 2007-2009 recession.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Investment Strategies

What's your investing game plan?

View Course »

Professional Vs Do it Yourself Investing

Should you get advice or DYI?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

60 Comments

Filter by:
betty_brock

I see Evan has a whole new batch of screen names.

December 19 2013 at 7:56 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
betty_brock

gop4ever, you don't know the horrible history of jimlapdance. He once posted what he thought was my name and address right here on AOL. That is the lowest of the low.

December 19 2013 at 7:54 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to betty_brock's comment
betty_brock

I'm praying for him.

December 21 2013 at 5:08 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mitchnoconnell

skcarcomed.0
Since when does a non believing Obamite like yourself care about what someone's church thinks. Instead creating your asinine screen names why don't you go out in your community on the south side and do something about inner city Obama supporters (IE gang members) that are killing each other everyday and harming innocent bystanders. You really are a tool.

Folks this is why we keep getting routed in national elections.

December 19 2013 at 3:50 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
gop4ever3

betty_brock
jimlapdance collects Barbie and Ken. He is always disappointed when he pulls Ken's pants down and doesn't find anything............. hence the new screen name, pirv or correctly, perv.

Betty dear what a nice compassionate conservative christian thing to say. Your Church must be very proud to have such an outstanding member as yourself as part of its congregation.

December 19 2013 at 2:27 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to gop4ever3's comment
betty_brock

jimlapdance once posted what he thought was my name and address right here on AOL. He is the lowest of the low.

December 19 2013 at 7:55 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
swissmissbachmann

demsbaitnswitch3
I taught them all to be self reliant. I'll bet your kids are all welfare brats.

We have read your posts, it is very evident that you are capable of teaching nothing.

December 19 2013 at 2:19 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
jimmy_branch

Thanks to the FED Clown all they have to do is sell their stocks - they don't need employees or taxes and here is one reason why. Did you know that there was one county in Texas who owned half of Disney at one time and they bought the shares with rainy day tax dollars.

December 19 2013 at 9:43 AM Report abuse -8 rate up rate down Reply
alfredschrader

When I worked at Crown Cork and Seal, I came in at 7am and my sheet metal shear machine was missing - a 4,000 pound machine. Only a wire was left sticking up out of the floor. I asked the super "Where is my machine ?" He said "Last night they sent it to Mexico" A month later they called me into the office. They sent the whole plant to Mexico along with my job.
There was something like $43,000.00 a year worth of US taxes on the Crown Cork and Seal plant.
It's not going to work. We can't tax our plants into oblivion.
When a company moves their plants to another country you get zero tax revenue because there are no employees to pay income tax, instead your GPA is siphoned off along with your prosperity. We need to fix this.

December 19 2013 at 7:06 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
David Storey

OR we could cut the $%$%$# nad just sell them to CHINA,the already own Most of amerika!BET they wont support our lazy,ignorant population!!no cotton fields just rice plantations!A rose by any other name is still a ROSE!!

December 19 2013 at 5:35 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
David Storey

here it goes the government take away the artificial support,aka stimulas,bailout or what ever you choose to call it !then we get to see the real results of "OBAMANOMICS"#$# where did that iceberg come from?

December 19 2013 at 5:31 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
toosmart4u

The republicans control the purse strings in the house. Shameful the way they are treating the college people, the poor, anyway the people they think do not vote for them. Hopefully a change is coming in 2014. On social security thank a democrat. Want to end these 2 fine programs vote republican.

December 19 2013 at 3:21 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply