T-Mobile is the nation's fastest-growing carrier. Last month, it added 1 million net new customers and 648,000 new subscribers. The quarter before that, it added 700,000, rapidly outpacing larger rivals AT&T and Verizon Wireless .

But there's something interesting about T-Mobile's new subscribers -- they don't seem to care for Apple's iPhone. Not that they don't want it -- T-Mobile sold about 900,000 iPhones last quarter -- but that, proportionately, they aren't buying as many of them. Last quarter, just 21% of the smartphones T-Mobile sold were iPhones; in comparison, a whopping 51% of Verizon's smartphone activations were Apple-made handsets.

What's with the discrepancy? A few percentage points may have been chalked up to random chance, but a difference of such magnitude speaks to some underlying force at play. T-Mobile's lack of subsidies stands as a major contributing factor.


T-Mobile's "un-carrier" initiatives
T-Mobile's recent growth has largely been the result of its new "un-carrier" policies, the most significant of which has been the cessation of two-year contracts. Unlike other carriers, T-Mobile's subscribers pay month to month, and there are no early-termination fees.

But with no contracts, there are no phone subsidies, either. When buying a phone from T-Mobile, customers must pay for the phone themselves -- either totally up front or by making a down payment (depending on the model), and then paying the rest in monthly installments.

This means that, to T-Mobile subscribers, the price of the handset they're purchasing is far more significant -- cheaper phones, therefore, become much more alluring. Nokia's 521, a phone that costs just $126, is listed as a top seller on T-Mobile's website. To get that phone, T-Mobile subscribers can either buy it outright or pay $5.25 per month for two years; in contrast, Apple's iPhone 5s can either be purchased for $649 or with a down payment of $150 and monthly installments of $21 for two years.

Phone subsidies make customers less price sensitive
The net effect of T-Mobile's new policies is to make consumers far more sensitive to the cost of their handsets: The price of T-Mobile's monthly service can very significantly based on which phone the subscriber chooses.

In contrast, subscribers on other carriers are likely to be far less sensitive to the cost of their phones -- the monthly bill is largely the same no matter which handset they use. Verizon Wireless offers cheaper phones, but there is little reason to purchase one. The Pantech Marauder, a phone running Google's Android, costs $340 unlocked. Subscribers signing a two-year agreement with Verizon get it for free, but customers would do themselves a great disservice in purchasing it.

Getting an iPhone 5s costs just $200 more because Verizon subsidizes the phone so generously. But compared to Pantech's phone, Apple's handset is well worth the extra $200, especially because contract signers will be forced to use it for two years. CNet gave Pantech's phone a rating of 7.0 (out of 10) lamenting its laggy processor; in contrast, it gave the iPhone 5s an 8.8, calling it the "fastest and most advanced Apple smartphone to date."

But once you get your new phone, you'll pay the same for monthly service -- for a plan with 2GB of data, Verizon charges about $100 per month. Users of Apple's iPhone 5s or Pantech's Marauder will end up paying the same monthly fee.

T-Mobile's growth is an area of concern for Apple
While Apple's iPhone has stayed strong in the U.S. (accounting for about 40% of smartphone sales), it's been sidelined in most other major markets. Worldwide, Apple's share of the smartphone is now down to about 13%.

The difference between the U.S. smartphone market and other countries largely comes down to subsidies -- Apple depends on carriers footing the majority of the bill for its expensive phones. That works exceptionally well when the carrier is Verizon, where flat monthly bills incentivize subscribers to get the best-quality phones possible, regardless of the price.

But not so much when the carrier no longer offers subsidies. T-Mobile subscribers can see vast differences in their monthly bill depending on their choice of handset, making them less likely to purchase an expensive iPhone from Apple.

Certainly, T-Mobile is just one carrier, and one of the smaller ones at that. But its rapid growth should be watched closely, particularly if other carriers move to adopt T-Mobile's policy.

No matter who wins the smartphone war, this company stands to profit
Want to get in on the smartphone phenomenon? Truth be told, one company sits at the crossroads of smartphone technology as we know it. It's not your typical household name, either. In fact, you've probably never even heard of it! But it stands to reap massive profits NO MATTER WHO ultimately wins the smartphone war. To find out what it is, click here to access the "One Stock You Must Buy Before the iPhone-Android War Escalates Any Further..."

The article T-Mobile Subscribers Don't Like Apple's iPhone originally appeared on Fool.com.

Sam Mattera has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Managing your Portfolio

Keeping your portfolio and financial life fit!

View Course »

What Is Your Risk Tolerance?

Answer the question "What type of investor am I?".

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:
dscarpola@me.com

Or maybe most pale fans left already waiting for the iphone. They will come back after contracts up. Because it's easy to unlock. And they hate verizon

November 20 2013 at 2:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply