MLPs are hot properties. Investors love them because of the high distributions. Oil and gas companies love them because investors are willing to pay up to buy an MLP, which unlocks value for the assets. That's why the market was caught quite off guard earlier this week when Denbury Resources declined the opportunity to join the MLP parade.
Background on the decision
The management team of Denbury Resources has been faced with a looming deadline. By 2017 or so the company would be producing much more cash flow than it needs to support its growth. Management knew it wanted to return much of that excess cash to investors. What it didn't know was how best to transition to a growth and income company.
While it could simply just start paying a dividend, it also had the option to convert some or all of its assets into an MLP. As it explored its available options, it decided that keeping it simple was the best option. Investors didn't like that move initially, but it really does make sense for the company. Let's take a closer look at why simplicity makes sense for Denbury.
Most of Denbury's assets would have fit in an MLP in one form or another. Because of this, and as the slide below shows, Denbury considered four MLP options.
The upstream option
Its big dilemma was if it should become an upstream MLP like LINN Energy or BreitBurn Energy Partners . All three companies own the long-life, low-decline producing assets that fit well in an MLP structure. In fact, both LINN and Breitburn also own enhanced oil recovery projects that use carbon dioxide, and Breitburn even owns some carbon dioxide related infrastructure thanks to its big oil deal earlier this year.
The big difference between these three companies is that Denbury's focus is on growing organically, while LINN Energy and BreitBurn grow production primarily by acquiring new assets. As the slide below shows, unless Denbury wanted to use its MLP units as acquisition currency, it didn't make sense for the company to join the upstream MLP sector.
Denbury has enough growth from its current assets that it can grow production by 4%-8% annually for the next several years using just its internally generated cash flow. If it became an MLP, a bulk of that cash flow would need to go to its investors. That means its growth would need to be funded by either debt or equity. While there is nothing inherently wrong with that, the fact that it does have these large capital needs adds to its risk as the company could have been forced to tap the capital markets at unfavorable rates. At this point, that risk didn't yield out sized rewards.
The downstream option
Denbury's other option was to consider packaging some of its carbon dioxide related infrastructure into a midstream MLP. While spinning off infrastructure into MLPs is pretty popular today, the difference for Denbury is that its infrastructure is really a competitive advantage to its ability to grow.
Because it owns the infrastructure, it's harder for a competitor to buy up the depleting oil fields surrounding Denbury's infrastructure. That competitor would need to build out its own infrastructure and that costs money. Denbury, on the other hand, would benefit from the scale it already has as it could add additional oil fields to its infrastructure without the large capital spend.
Its other options would have it becoming more like Kinder Morgan Partners . Its carbon assets not only support Kinder Morgan's carbon flooding in the Permian Basin, but it sells additional carbon supplies to others in the Basin. The different here is that Kinder Morgan's business is built around the fees it earns as a major midstream operator, not from producing oil. Denbury simply sees greater opportunities in oil production than in shipping carbon.
While investors sold off Denbury on the news, they are missing the big picture. By moving to an MLP Denbury would be giving up a great deal of control of its future. Its ability to grow within its cash flow, while still paying a dividend, means it won't be at the mercy of the capital markets. Further, by hanging on to its carbon infrastructure it will retain control of this distinct competitive advantage. So, while its dividends might not be as high as they could have been if Denbury made the switch to an MLP, its new dividend will be among the most rock-solid in the industry and will have ample upside in the future.
Looking for more rock-solid dividends?
Dividend stocks like MLPs or Denbury Resources can make you rich. It's as simple as that. Over the long term, the compounding effect of the quarterly payouts, as well as their growth, adds up faster than most investors imagine. With this in mind, our analysts sat down to identify the absolute best of the best when it comes to rock-solid dividend stocks, drawing up a list in this free report of nine that fit the bill. To discover the identities of these companies before the rest of the market catches on, you can download this valuable free report by simply clicking here now.
The article Not Everyone Wants to Be an MLP originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Matt DiLallo owns shares of Linn Energy, LLC. Matt DiLallo has the following options: short January 2014 $18 puts on Denbury Resources. The Motley Fool recommends BreitBurn Energy Partners L.P.. The Motley Fool owns shares of Denbury Resources. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.