Ever since the Macondo incident in 2010, many have considered BP a toxic asset. Original estimates for the massive Gulf of Mexico oil spill totaled more than $140 billion in costs for BP, and there were threats that the company could crack in the face of these bills. There are still many questions remaining regarding BP, but there are also some reasons investors may want to reconsider this oil giant. Let's take a look at three reasons why investors should be bullish on BP.
1) Macondo won't kill the company
So far, BP has spent approximately $42 billion for everything related to the spill, and it is on the hook for another potential $55 billion for charges from both the Clean Water Act and local and state government claims. It is highly unlikely that court decisions will result in the maximum penalties in both of these cases, so it's safe to assume that the final penalties will be less than $55 billion. Either way, a total of $97 billion is significantly lower than the $140 billion hit that scared investors in the midst of the spill.
The fear that many investors may have today is that the $20 billion trust fund set up by BP to cover most of the legal claims from the spill wouldn't cover all the costs, and that the company would need to take earnings hits for the remainder of the costs. One assurance to calming this fear is that BP has more than $28 billion in cash and short-term investments sitting on its balance sheet, with almost $10 billion of that designated specifically to handle future claims and litigation. Also, with the company generating nearly $22 billion in cash over the past 12 months from both asset sales and operations, BP should be able to stash enough cash to cover these issues without any major unexpected hits to the income statement.
2) Earnings power viable despite major asset selloff
One way BP has covered costs for Macondo has been by selling off more than $38 billion of its assets. The most recent of these deals was to sell its Texas City refinery and associated assets to Marathon Petroleum for $2.5 billion. While there may be concerns that the company's ability to generate returns will be severely hampered by these moves. BP has so far avoided drastically impacting its primary income generation engine: the upstream side of the business.
Some may critique BP for not getting top dollar for its sales of the Texas City refinery to Marathon or the Carson refinery to Tesoro earlier this year, but what may be overlooked is the ability to generate $5 billion from these assets in a business segment that doesn't add much to the bottom line of the company. Even with the Texas City and Carson refineries, the downstream segment only represented 8% of the company's 2012 earnings even during one of the best years for U.S. refiners.
In fact, BP may actually be ahead of the curve in comparison to the rest of its integrated major peers. Big oil has struggled recently in the downstream side of operations, and some are starting to slowly pull out. Total has been shuttering its European refineries at a pretty rapid pace this year, and ExxonMobil spun off its Japanese downstream operations to one of its equity affiliates in 2012. If the downstream side of the business continues to underperform for big oil, then BP's decision to shed these refiners to Tesoro and Marathon may be an unintentional stroke of genius.
3) Strong project portfolio
This "trimming of the fat" that BP has undertaken to cover expenses for Macondo may have been a blessing in disguise. It has forced the company to review its assets and projects to determine the most profitable ventures going forward and excise its lesser ventures. This has resulted in a very strong project portfolio that could serve the company well in the future. Here's why:
- Solid production mix: BP is pursuing major growth in the offshore regions of the Gulf of Mexico, the North Sea, India, and West Africa, as well as major operations in the Caspian Sea region. What makes these projects unique is the potential to drive high value based on the type of production. These assets are either pursuing oil or oil-indexed natural gas, which commands a much higher price than market-based gas like what we have here in the U.S.
- Ideal locations for gas assets: Another benefit of these natural gas projects is their access to major demand centers through pipeline versus LNG. By connecting both Europe and India to natural gas via pipelines, BP can realize higher gross margins for its gas given the high costs of moving LNG in comparison to pipe.
- Locations with production history: Aside from the India discovery, these regions have been known as major production centers for many years. They may be in decline, but BP and many other majors are developing new enhanced oil recovery techniques that could unlock more oil from existing fields. BP estimates it can get another 42 million barrels out of its Clair Ridge field in the U.K. thanks to these new techniques. Such projects are more of a sure thing than some of the more speculative projects like ExxonMobil's upcoming ventures into the Arctic.
BP is in position to become a much more efficient operator as it finishes its asset sales and as Macondo becomes less and less a part of the picture. This strong portfolio of projects could be a major win for the company going forward.
What a Fool believes
There are several things to like about BP's post-Macondo potential. And with the company trading at valuations below its peers and sporting a 5% dividend yield, it may be a good time for investors to think about BP for their portfolio.
The article The Bullish Case for BP originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Tyler Crowe has no position in any stocks mentioned. You can follow him at Fool.com under the handle TMFDirtyBird, on Google +, or on Twitter, @TylerCroweFool. The Motley Fool recommends Total SA. (ADR). Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.