Insiders React to Fed's 'No Taper' Decision

×
APTOPIX Wall Street
Richard Drew/AP
By Victoria Craig

In a move that surprised Wall Street, the Federal Reserve announced Wednesday it will not yet begin paring back its asset-buying program known as QE3.

The announcement sent shockwaves through the markets as traders cheered the continuation of the Fed's easy-money polices.

Wall Street's knee-jerk reaction to the news was intense: The S&P 500 (^GSPC) immediately shot to a new record high, gold surged $30, while oil shot up $2. The 10-year U.S. Treasury yield plunged to 2.73 percent, while the VIX (^VIX) tumbled some 6 percent. The Dow Jones industrial average (^DJI), minutes later, followed the S&P's lead and hit a new record high as well.

That was all within the first five minutes.

Ahead of the announcement, market participants and analysts on Wall Street expected the central bank to announce a taper of roughly $10 billion to $15 billion dollars, bringing the full size of the program to $85 billion a month.

But IHS Global Insights, in a note to clients following the announcement, said the decision makes sense thanks to slumping payroll numbers since June, when taper talk began.

"We suspect that the bias on the committee remains against a long-lasting QE program. Barring a really bad outcome from the upcoming battles over fiscal policy in the fall and winter, we expect the Fed to taper at the December meeting," IHS wrote in its note.

Dan Greenhouse, chief global strategist at BTIG, warns, though, the Fed could be backing itself into a corner when it comes to timelines and strategy -- saying it could eventually find itself "trapped" in a negative cycle.


"If the tightening of financial conditions, which was partially a result of the Fed's decision to discuss slowing asset purchases, is enough to forestall an actual reduction, then in theory the Fed can never cease purchasing assets unless there is no adverse reaction in asset markets," Greenhaus wrote.

Indeed, Todd Schoenberger, managing partner at LandColt Capital, believes at this point QE is here to stay. In a tweet, he said it looks as though there's no exit strategy for the Fed. He estimates by the end of 2014 -- when Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke said the central bank could conceivably end completely its asset buying -- the Fed will have spent more than $4 trillion across all of the easing programs.

"Ben needs some chutzpah. Just say it: Congress, like the economy, is a joke. After $3.6 trillion, we still can't get it [the economy] going," Schoenberger tweeted.

Deutsche Bank noted the doves clearly prevailed at the FOMC's two-day meeting, and says it now expects a taper start date to begin sometimes around the end of 2013.

"Given that the financial markets had priced in the beginning of a QE taper today, policymakers had a free option to proceed without a major shock to the markets. Given that they did not take this option, the likelihood of an October taper is reduced -- and so at this juncture, the first move now appears to be in December, which is when we will get another round of updated forecasts and another press conference," the bank said in a note to clients.

Adding to that, Peter Boockvar, managing director and chief market analyst at The Lindsey Group, said there will never be a good time to being easing Wall Street off the easy money -- better to get it over with sooner rather than later.

"Bottom line, while the economic data over the past few months did not call for a taper according to the Fed's econometric models, I believe they are making a massive mistake as this QE policy does nothing but manipulate and distort asset prices with no lasting positive impact on the economy. Rip this band aid off already I say," Boockvar said in a note to clients.

In a sign of merriment on the Street following the announcement, Schoenberger shared with his followers the sentiment from a drugstore cashier.


More from Fox Business:



Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Reading a Stock Quote

Learn to read the ingredients of a stock.

View Course »

Socially Responsible Investing

Invest in companies with a conscience.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

3 Comments

Filter by:
Lonnie R McVaigh

And, since they continue the Massive Bank Bail Outs with the HUGE 85 Billion Bond buying adding to the Collosal Stockpile of side lined Home Mortgage Capital Pool the Banks are FORCED to remove their now unwarrented increases of almost 2% on Home Loans...

The Banks have been Breaking Income Records on top of Income Records for so long... That money is drawing the whole WORLDS attention and everyone is on PINS AND NEEDLES just waiting for the APR to return into the 3% range so that the Consumers can access affordable Home Loans again!!!

Funny how the Banks STOCKS jumped up within 5 MINUTES, but still even today they pause and hold those APR's up nearly at 5%... SKIMMING and LOOTING the American Public to hold the recovery of MAIN STREET and keep up the DEBT BONDAGE for as long as possible... What does Ben say? NADA... Capitalism is a POOR replacement for a Democracy!!!

The Banking System and Monetary Policy is Fascism and based on GREED with zero Loyalty to American Democracy and has not even a remote reflection of any "Free Market"... If it did wouldn't APR's return to at least the low 3% range where it was before Ben Flopped his Jaws such as a Insider Trader often does with impunity?

Note: The Syrian's and most all "Islamic Banks" do not charge interest, they share "Profits AND Loss" Equally... Is that why we Back War so often against real "Free Markets"? REALLY!!!

September 19 2013 at 11:54 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Big John

More free money for those who got us in this mess and who tell us to make it on your own without any government help. Can you say hypocrite!

September 19 2013 at 11:50 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
dearthaircroi

the Fed will have spent more than $4 trillion across all of the easing programs.

The higher we go the longer the fall is going to be.

September 19 2013 at 9:46 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply