U.S. Poverty Rate Stayed Stuck at 15% - a Record 46.5 Million People

Mother and two sons walking past boarded up house in Detroit
Alamy
By HOPE YEN

WASHINGTON -- The nation's poverty rate remained stuck at 15 percent last year despite America's slowly reviving economy, a discouraging lack of improvement for the record 46.5 million poor and an unwelcome benchmark for President Barack Obama's recovery plans.

More than 1 in 7 Americans were living in poverty, not statistically different from the 46.2 million of 2011 and the sixth straight year the rate had failed to improve, the Census Bureau reported Tuesday. Median income for the nation's households was $51,017, also unchanged from the previous year after two consecutive annual declines, while the share of people without health insurance did improve but only a bit, from 15.7 percent to 15.4 percent.

"We're in the doldrums, with high poverty and inequality as the new normal for the foreseeable future," said Timothy Smeeding, an economics professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who specializes in income inequality. "The fact we've seen no real recovery in employment and wages means we've just flatlined."

Mississippi had the highest share of its residents in poverty, at 22 percent, according to rough calculations by the Census Bureau. It was followed by Louisiana, New Mexico and Arkansas. On the other end of the scale, New Hampshire had the lowest share, at 8.1 percent.

The last significant decline in the national poverty rate came in 2006, during the Bush administration and before the housing bubble burst and the recession hit. In 2011, the rate dipped to 15 percent from 15.1 percent, but census officials said that change was statistically insignificant.

For the past year, the official poverty line was an annual income of $23,492 for a family of four.
The Census Bureau's annual report offers a snapshot of the economic well-being of U.S. households for 2012, when the unemployment rate averaged 8.1 percent after reaching an average high of 9.6 percent in 2010. Typically, the poverty rate tends to move in a similar direction as the unemployment rate, so many analysts had been expecting a modest decline in poverty.

The latest census data show that the gap between rich and poor was largely unchanged over the past year, having widened since 2007 to historic highs.

Signs of Improvement

On Monday, Obama called attention to what he described as economic improvements -- the nation's gross domestic product did rise by 2.8 percent last year -- and said congressional Republicans would reverse recent gains if they took uncompromising stands in connection with looming budget deadlines.

Some GOP conservatives have been demanding a delay of Obama's new health care law as the price for supporting continued federal government spending. The House is also expected to consider a bill this week that would cut food stamps for the poor by an estimated $4 billion annually -- 10 times the size of cuts passed by the Democratic Senate -- and allow states to put broad new work requirements in place for recipients.

"This lack of improvement in poverty is disappointing and discouraging," said John Iceland, a former Census Bureau chief of the poverty and health statistics branch who is now a Penn State sociology professor. "This lack of progress in poverty indicates that these small improvements in the economy are not yet being equally shared by all."

Ron Haskins, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution who specializes in poverty, agreed.

"Everything's on hold, but at a bad level; poverty and income did not change much in 2012," he said. "So child poverty is still too high and family income is still too low. The recession may be over, but try to tell that to these struggling families. Don't expect things to change until the American economy begins to generate more jobs."

What Doesn't Count in Those Numbers: Quite a Lot

The official poverty level is based on a government calculation that includes only income before tax deductions. It excludes capital gains or accumulated wealth, such as home ownership.

As a result, the rate takes into account the effects of some government benefits, such as unemployment compensation. It does not factor in noncash government aid such as tax credits and food stamps.

David Johnson, the chief of the Census Bureau's household economics division, estimated that unemployment benefits helped keep 1.7 million people out of poverty.

If non-cash government aid were counted in the official formula, the earned income tax credit would have lifted another 5.5 million people above the poverty threshold. Counting food stamps would have boosted 4 million people, lowering the poverty rate to 13.7 percent.

The slight dip in Americans without health coverage meant 48 million people were without insurance. The drop was due mostly to increases in government coverage, such as Medicaid and Medicare. The number of people covered by employer-provided health insurance remained flat.

The decline in the uninsured was modest compared to a bigger drop in 2011, which occurred due to increased coverage for young adults under the new health care law.

Because the main provisions of the Affordable Care Act don't take effect until 2014, the latest census numbers offer a baseline number of uninsured by which increased coverage and effectiveness of the law will be measured. Many conservative Republicans remain committed to repealing the law.

Starting next year, the government will offer tax credits for people without access to job-based health insurance to buy private coverage through new markets, called exchanges, in each state. Open enrollment starts Oct 1. The new health care law also expands Medicaid to cover millions more low-income people, but so far only 24 states plus Washington, D.C., have gone along with the expansion.

The Congressional Budget Office estimates that by next year, the health law will reduce the number of uninsured in the U.S. by about 25 percent. By 2017, it is projected that 92 percent of eligible Americans will have health insurance, a 10 percentage point increase from today's level.

Other census findings:
  • Poverty remained largely unchanged across race and ethnic groups. Blacks had the highest rate at 27.2 percent, compared to 25.6 percent for Hispanics and 11.7 percent for Asian-Americans. Whites had a rate of 9.7 percent.
  • Child poverty stood at 21.8 percent.
  • Poverty among people 65 and older was basically unchanged at 9.1 percent, after hitting a record low of 8.9 percent in 2009.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Managing your Portfolio

Keeping your portfolio and financial life fit!

View Course »

Introduction to Retirement Funds

Target date funds help you maintain a long term portfolio.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

9 Comments

Filter by:
frank1946

Same as it was in 1964.

Federal Government should be Fired !

Very Simple.

September 17 2013 at 11:08 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
hillchas

According to this article one can own a home and have money in the bank and collect food stamps and other Government goodies and get a tax refund thru earned income credit and earn $24,500.00 a year and STILL be considered to be below the poverty level.........Only in America.

September 17 2013 at 9:22 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Erik Kengaard

"The connection between the oversupply of labour and plummeting living standards for the poor is one of the more robust generalisations in history." Peter Turchin, Return of the oppressed, aeon magazine.
And congress wants to import more labor?

September 17 2013 at 8:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bubble Burster

Thank OBAMA for America's RECORD HIGH POVERTY!

This record high poverty is a DIRECT RESULT of Obama's POLICIES!

WAKE UP!

He's not done yet. He wants the coming generation to also be in poverty by the DEBT he is leaving us. We are about 74 TRILLION in debt. That includes existing DEBT we OWE to other countries that "bailed" us out. Do you really believe OTHER countries will continue to "bail" us out when we keep getting DEEPER in DEBT? They won't. They will sigh and say, "sorry" it's unlikely we will be paid back and we will use our money to INVEST where there is a BETTER RETURN. U.S. you are DECLINING and put our bailout money at risk.

Yes, this is ALL due to Obama - not "drug use" or any other EXCUSES.

WAKE UP!

September 17 2013 at 5:08 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply
stumpgrindr

Thank Obama.....he needs to go back and be his community activist role again......probably will blame Bush

September 17 2013 at 4:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to stumpgrindr's comment
jdykbpl45

Spot on.

September 17 2013 at 5:28 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jhfabricast

With all the drug abuse in this his country there will always be a high poverty rate.

September 17 2013 at 4:28 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
templet1966

So much for "hope and Change."

September 17 2013 at 4:03 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
newpeach

Even though its bad, if it really hasnt changed since pre recession 2006, we are probably lucky its not worse. TECHNOLOGY is replacing many jobs regardless of who is in power.

September 17 2013 at 3:58 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to newpeach's comment
Bubble Burster

Companies are NOT HIRING in technology. They are OUTSOURCING It because of Obama's POLICIES. It's CHEAPER to have India and other countries DO THE WORK. We are not putting money into Research and Development as we used to since companies do NOT have the money to invest. They are being taxed to death and with all the OBAMACARE regulations and fees they are NOT hiring and REDUCING people to PART TIME employment to AVOID it. Companies would PREFER to use HOME GROWN people rather than outsourcing it. You don't understand business.

" ,,,,, it hasn't changed since 2006 ...." What on earth are you talking about? The article is ALL ABOUT RECORD HIGH POVERTY! Did you READ this article? It directly contradicts you.

"The last significant decline in the national poverty rate came in 2006, during the Bush administration and before the housing bubble burst and the recession hit."

There was a DECLINE in the national poverty rate in 2006 during the BUSH administration. You see Bush is not a class warfare or race warfare President. Bush promoted capitalism. Obama promotes outright COMMUNISM - right on down to SPYING on every move you make ... GET IT YET?

September 17 2013 at 5:15 PM Report abuse -3 rate up rate down Reply