A Time-Honored Retirement Savings Rule Comes Under Attack

×
Retirement planning 4 percent rule 401k pension ira savings
Alamy
After spending your whole career trying to save up enough money for a comfortable retirement, retirees face a brand new challenge: how to make their investment portfolio last a lifetime.

Most financial advisers believed that they had a simple answer to that tough question, but recently, the rule they came up with has come under fire for potentially being too risky. Let's take a look at the controversial "4-percent rule" and why critics have attacked it recently.

Understanding the 4-Percent Rule

In terms of simplicity, you can't really beat the 4-percent rule. How it works is that you take your total portfolio value when you retire and multiply it by 4 percent. The resulting figure gives you your annual income. The following year, you take the previous year's figure and then adjust it by whatever the inflation rate was during the previous year.

The result is that you should be able to sustain the same purchasing power throughout your retirement.

When 'The Rules' Don't Work

The 4-percent rule has been around for a long time and was based on actual performance in the stock, bond and other financial markets. Yet as analysis from mutual-fund giant T. Rowe Price shows, retirees who retired in 2000 with their investments split 55/45 between stocks and bonds and who followed the 4-percent rule saw their portfolios lose a third of their value by the end of 2010.

Looking forward, even bigger concerns exist.

With both the stock market and the bond market at relatively high price levels, a paper earlier this year from two professors and an investment professional at Morningstar (MORN) found that an extended period of low investment returns could sabotage the 4-percent rule, with failure rates exceeding 50 percent under certain circumstances. In particular, the paper, "The 4 Percent Rule Is Not Safe in a Low-Yield World," focused on low interest rates that dramatically sapped the income-producing potential of the bond portion of portfolios.

Turning to the IRS for Help

Rather than using the 4-percent rule, one alternative looks at a rate that the IRS uses to determine how much money retirees have to take out of IRAs and certain other retirement-plan accounts.

In order to prevent investors from keeping money in traditional IRAs and 401(k)s forever, the IRS has rules governing required minimum distributions each year that take effect when you turn 70½. Essentially, you're required to take out a fraction of your total retirement-account balances every year. That amount is based on the expected number of years remaining in your lifetime. An IRS publication provides the appropriate life-expectancy table.

Compared to following the 4 percent rule, using the IRS tables results in smaller withdrawals in the early years of retirement. For example, the rate for a 62-year-old equates to a roughly 3-percent withdrawal. Only once you reach age 73 does the withdrawal go above 4 percent, and there are no automatic upward adjustments for inflation -- the only boost comes if your portfolio value increases.

The IRS-table method has advantages and disadvantages.

On one hand, unlike the 4-percent rule, it's mathematically impossible to run out of money using the IRS-table method, as each year's withdrawal is based on the remaining value in the portfolio rather than the first year's value. The IRS-table method also lets retirees benefit from increases in the market value of their assets. Yet it leaves retirees exposed to big drops in allowed withdrawals if their investments suddenly lose value.

Handling Retirement Risk

Without knowing the future, it's impossible to know whether any given method for drawing down your retirement savings will work best. Under some conditions, the 4-percent rule will work fine; in others, using the IRS-table method will give you better results.

What's really important, though, is to understand the principles behind the different rules.
The 4-percent rule shows that in most situations, ignoring market noise and making consistent withdrawals is perfectly safe. Yet the IRS-table method proves the value of being flexible enough in your finances to handle falling income levels -- at least temporarily.

Using the principles behind both rules can put you in the best position to retire comfortably no matter what happens in the markets.

You can follow Motley Fool contributor Dan Caplinger on Twitter @DanCaplinger or on Google Plus.



Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How Financial Planners go Grocery Shopping

Learn to shop smart and save.

View Course »

Introduction to Retirement Funds

Target date funds help you maintain a long term portfolio.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

Comments

Filter by:
Artie

As someone pointed out below...the first rule of financial planning is to "pay yourself first." This means to start saving and more importantly investing SOMETHING as early as you can. Don't take on unnecessary debt. Once you have an emergency fund you need to put away money and invest on a consistent basis (usually meaning "dollar cost averaging") Being too conservative is not helpful either (sticking money in a low interest taxable bank account). No question...take advantage of any employer sponsored savings plans (assuming you have one). Otherwise, you should at least have an IRA. Start saving as much as you can as early as you can, even if it sounds like your saving hardly anything at first.. People, these days are going to be asked to provide more and more of their own money towards their retirement as pensions have largely gone the way of the Dodo bird and Social Security was never meant to be the sole source of retirement income. The way this country is going, who knows what SS will look like in fhe future?

September 03 2013 at 10:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
j79xjames

The key to a successful retirement (at least financially) is to start planning and saving early in life, be consistent (save withe very paycheck) and take advantage of any employer matching plan. If you do this hopefully your nest egg will be large enough not to have to worry whether to withdraw 3% or 4% per year. You should withdraw what you need to sustain the lifestyle you are leading. There are many sites that offer information on this. I recently found the site Retirement And Good Living that provides information on various retirement topics including finance, health, retirement locations, volunteering and more. I don't understand why more people don't take advantage of the available information on these sites. In most cases it is free.

September 02 2013 at 7:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to j79xjames's comment
vlady1000

Matching? What is that?...not from my employer

September 02 2013 at 7:46 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply