GM: We're Worried About Tesla Motors
Jul 20th 2013 9:03AM
Updated Jul 23rd 2013 4:08PM
Unless you follow the automakers closely, you might have missed one of the biggest news items of the week. General Motors Vice Chairman Steve Girsky dropped this quiet bombshell in an interview with Bloomberg this past week: GM's brass is worried about Tesla Motors .
Girsky said that his boss, CEO Dan Akerson, has assigned a team to study Tesla and how it might threaten GM's business. That's a move that says a lot about Tesla's success -- but it also says a lot about how General Motors is quickly becoming a very different kind of company from the GM of old.
Old GM wouldn't have cared about Tesla
The fact that a massive global automaker is worried about still-tiny Tesla is a tip of the cap to the Silicon Valley upstart and its CEO, Elon Musk. While it remains to be seen whether Tesla will succeed in the long term, it has already earned considerable respect.
Just by bringing a high-quality mass-produced car to market, Tesla has gone where almost no automotive start-ups have managed to go before -- never mind that Tesla's cars are the best-yet implementation of a groundbreaking new technology.
But Girsky made this little disclosure as part of making a larger point about GM. For decades, GM was famously arrogant, and old-school GM executives wouldn't even have taken notice of an upstart like Tesla.
Even now, it's not hard to find plenty of old Detroit types eager to argue that Tesla isn't worth taking seriously - that they're just a company full of computer geeks playing around with laptop batteries, pretending to be an automaker.
That's how it would have gone at Old GM. Tesla? Who cares!
But what Girsky is saying is that Old GM is being replaced by a New GM -- or, at least, he and Akerson hope that's what's happening.
A major shift in a dysfunctional corporate culture
Girsky's point was that Akerson is pushing hard to change GM's culture, to get rid of that old insulation and arrogance and replace it with something much more competitive.
Clearly, GM needs to be hungrier, more attuned to the reality of its hypercompetitive global business. Here's another example from Girsky: For years, GM had a fantastic research department that won dozens of new patents every year -- but few of its innovations found their way into vehicles.
Akerson and Girsky want to change that. There's much more focus now on real-world innovation, on customers' needs, on technology that can be commercialized quickly, they say.
And all of this comes in the context of a global reorganization and new controls that have reduced costs, reduced the time it takes to get new products to market, and given senior executives much more data - much more quickly.
GM doesn't have a choice: It has to change, and fast -- GM managed to hold its global lead for decades even as it blundered along, but it can't do that anymore. Its two largest global competitors, Toyota and Volkswagen , are well-run cutting edge contenders. Both would have eaten Old GM's lunch. (Arguably, Toyota did.)
To compete, GM has to follow in old rival Ford's footsteps and reinvent itself as a focused, disciplined, globally oriented company.
That's what Akerson and Girsky are trying very hard to do. Making a point of learning the lessons of Tesla's success is just one sign of that effort. But will it work? We'll find out.
China is already the world's largest auto market -- and it's set to grow even bigger in the coming years. A recent Motley Fool report, "2 Automakers to Buy for a Surging Chinese Market," names two global giants poised to reap big gains that could drive big rewards for investors. You can read this report right now for free -- just click here for instant access.
The article GM: We're Worried About Tesla Motors originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor John Rosevear owns shares of Ford and General Motors. Follow him on Twitter at @jrosevear . The Motley Fool recommends Ford, General Motors, and Tesla Motors and owns shares of Ford and Tesla Motors. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.