Why Isn't the Dow Bouncing Back More?
Jun 21st 2013 11:04AM
Updated Jun 21st 2013 11:06AM
On countless occasions during the past four years, the stock market has responded to substantial short-term drops by recovering all of its losses in fairly short order. Yet when you look at what happened this morning, you get a troubling sign that the trend toward immediate gratification might finally have reversed itself. After climbing as much as 100 points, the Dow Jones Industrials gave up much of those gains despite comments from St. Louis Fed President James Bullard that explained his dissent in Wednesday's Fed decision. Yet rather than appeasing investors by making it clear that the Fed is considering both sides of the monetary-policy debate, the comments only added to concerns about how the Fed can address disparate views among policymakers. At 10:50 a.m. EDT, the Dow was up about 33 points.
One problem holding the Dow back from a recovery involves renewed concerns about long-running scandals. For instance, Bank of America leads the Dow's decliners with a 2.7% drop as banking regulators consider doubling the minimum capital requirements for it and several other large banks. The move could force B of A, Citigroup , and JPMorgan Chase to stop paying dividends until their capital reserves rise enough to meet the new standards. Further, given reports that one investigator has found that mortgage-servicing companies have provided inaccurate information to the financial institutions that act as trustees for mortgage-bond investors, banks that have already suffered greatly from billions of dollars in lawsuit settlements could potentially see further hits. Citigroup has fallen the most of the three, down 3.6%, while JPMorgan's loss is minimal at 0.8%.
On the other side of the coin, though, is strong performance from consumer stocks. Procter & Gamble is leading the Dow upward with gains of about 2%. After confounding conservative investors who had hoped the stock would provide better protection against downturns than it has, P&G is finally seeing its valuation return closer to levels at which defensive investors can feel more confident of their beneficial traits in resisting downturns. Consumers aren't nearly as quick to respond to changing economic conditions as the stock market is, so investors can expect consumer-facing companies to hold up well so long as their customers don't lose their own optimism about the economic recovery.
The Dow's failure to bounce back more convincingly after a two-day, 550-point drop is troubling to short-term traders who look for greater conviction after steep losses. But for long-term investors seeking better investing opportunities, the best news in the world would be further stock market losses, even in the face of improving fundamentals for promising companies.
Bank of America's stock doubled in 2012. Is there more yet to come? With significant challenges still ahead, it's critical to have a solid understanding of this megabank before adding it to your portfolio. In The Motley Fool's premium research report on B of A, analyst Anand Chokkavelu, CFA, and financials bureau chief Matt Koppenheffer lift the veil on the bank's operations, detailing three reasons to buy and three reasons to sell. Click here now to claim your copy.
The article Why Isn't the Dow Bouncing Back More? originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Dan Caplinger owns warrants on Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase. You can follow him on Twitter @DanCaplinger. The Motley Fool recommends Bank of America and Procter & Gamble. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America, Citigroup, and JPMorgan Chase. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.