U.S. and Canada Energy Fate Lies in Each Other's Hands
Jun 18th 2013 9:25PM
Updated Jun 19th 2013 1:00AM
Canada's oil industry is like Bizarro Superman.
For those of you who aren't comic book nerds or are not die-hard fans of Seinfeld, Bizarro Superman is the antithesis of Superman. His actions were always the exact opposite of what we would expect from Superman. In the world of energy, Canada is much like Bizarro Superman because of how different its oil industry is to that of the United States. Let's take a look at this bizarre scenario and what it means for some energy companies.
The North American odd couple
Canada has consistently been a net exporter of oil since 1981. Yet despite exporting more than 3 million barrels per day to the U.S., provinces east of Ontario import more than 60% of their oil needs. There are two primary reasons this happens: (1) Canada doesn't have adequate infrastructure to economically deliver oil from the Western shale plays to the Eastern refineries, and (2) The majority of Eastern refineries are built to handle lighter, sweeter crudes that came from foreign sources.
Now let's contrast this with the U.S. Since 1958, we have been a net importer of crude oil, yet today many of our refineries are oversupplied and are sending more than 750,000 barrels of refined products to foreign markets. Also, the massive boom in shale oil has U.S. refineries flooded with light, sweet oils. This type of oil is so abundant that refineries are at a saturation point for this kind of oil and we have exported oil at a rate of about 100,000 barrels per day over the past three months.
What really brings the U.S. and Canada's energy relationship into Bizarro world is that both countries are trying to increase imports and exports to each other at the same time.
The yin to our yang
The reason we are seeing such a large uptick in both imports and exports to Canada is that both countries have what the other needs: Refineries in the Gulf Coast of the U.S. are built to process heavier, more sour crudes from places like Mexico and Venezuela. Meanwhile, Canada's Eastern refineries have operated on those lighter oils from places like the Middle East and the North Sea. Luckily for both countries, U.S. shale oils and Canadian oil sands are the perfect fit for the other countries' refineries.
Despite the obvious fundamental advantages of increased trade of oil between the two countries, there are still some major political hurdles to conquer. On the Canada-to-U.S. side of the argument, TransCanada's Keystone XL pipeline has been stuck in litigation for several months. The proposed pipeline has the potential to deliver 830,000 barrels per day of oil to refineries in the Gulf of Mexico, a region that is capable of refining about 2.3 million barrels per day of heavy sour crude. The problem, however, is that the pipeline is receiving stiff opposition from political groups over environmental concerns. Other pipelines such as Enbridge's Mainline and Energy Transfer Partner's Trunkline Reversal project have also met some opposition over similar concerns to Keystone XL, but they certainly have not seen as much media attention.
Refineries in U.S. PADD Districts II and III, also known as the Gulf Coast and mid-continent districts, combined to refine about 640,000 barrels per day of Canadian oil sands, much of that coming from Enbridge's and TransCanada's existing oil pipelines as well as rail shipments. If refineries ever hope to replace other foreign heavy oils with Canadian oil sands, though, more pipeline capacity will be needed.
For oil to go from the U.S. to Canada, a ban on oil exports in 1979 means that any company that wishes to export oil to Canada must receive a special license to do so. Both Valero and Royal Dutch Shell have these permits to ship oil to is refineries in Canada, and Buckeye Partners has just begun shipments of Bakken crude from its refinery in Albany, N.Y., to Irving Oil's refinery in St. John's, New Brunswick. These three companies have been the largest contributors to the spike in oil exports to Canada, but a more open export policy from the U.S. would make this exchange easier.
What a Fool believes
The U.S. and Canada's energy profiles may be the Bizarro version of each other, but they represent an enormous opportunity for both countries to mutually benefit from each other's strengths and weaknesses. With so much mutual gain at stake for both countries, it's much easier to understand why we consider North American energy independence rather than the U.S. alone.
The only way we will be able to realize the potential of North American energy independence, though, is through expanded oil and gas infrastructure across the US. This means that much of North America's energy fate lies in the hands of midstream companies like Energy Transfer Partners. To see if ETP and its sizable asset base are up to the task of improving energy security and creating value for shareholders, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's premium research report on the company. Simply click here now for a thorough expert analysis of this midstream company.
The article U.S. and Canada Energy Fate Lies in Each Other's Hands originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Tyler Crowe has no position in any stocks mentioned. You can follow him at Fool.com under the handle TMFDirtyBird, on Google +, or on Twitter, @TylerCroweFool. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned, either. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.