You Were Lied to: Household Wealth Has Not Recovered
Jun 7th 2013 4:33PM
Updated Jun 7th 2013 5:25PM
Did you hear the news? You're richer than you've ever been!
Never mind, of course, the 13.8% real unemployment rate.
According to yesterday's headlines, our collective household wealth ascended to an all-time high in the first quarter of the year. Here's how The Wall Street Journal advertised it: "Household Wealth Jumps to Pre-Recession Levels." This is The New York Times' headline: "Fed Reports American Households Have Regained Ground Lost in the Recession." And last but not least, the headline from Bloomberg News: "U.S. Household Worth Tops Pre-Recession Peak for First Time."
The gist of each was the same. Yesterday morning, the Federal Reserve released the most recent update to its flow-of-funds data -- a massive repository of financial statistics that's updated by the central bank on a quarterly basis. Among other things, the data showed that the cumulative net worth of American households and nonprofit institutions had finally surpassed the pre-recession high.
While this is great news, there are two problems with it. First, as you can see in the chart above, the claim that household net worth has fully regained the ground it lost in the Great Recession is only true if you fail to account for inflation. Once you factor this in, using a price deflator supplied by the Federal Reserve, the result isn't quite so rosy.
Here are the numbers: On a nominal basis, household and nonprofit net worth came in at $70.3 trillion last quarter, topping the previous high of $68.1 trillion in the third quarter of 2007. But on a real basis, using 2005 as our base year, the figure was a much more modest $60.4 trillion compared with the previous high of $64 trillion in the second quarter of 2007.
See what a difference that makes?
And the second problem is that whatever gains have come about have accrued almost exclusively to the wealthy. To give credit where credit is due, USA Today made this point front and center in its coverage of the issue.
Citing a St. Louis Fed report, the newspaper noted that rising stock prices -- evidenced by the recent highs in both the Dow Jones Industrial Average and the S&P 500 -- accounted for nearly two-thirds of the rebound in wealth through the end of last year. And the wealthiest 10% of Americans own 80% of stocks.
Now, don't get me wrong -- I'm all for getting rich and staying rich. But the problem is that this unequal recovery is masking the true health of the underlying economy. Don't forget that 70% of gross domestic product stems from consumer spending, and much of that comes from the shrinking middle class.
As a simple example of this, you need only look at the variant performances of deep-discounter Dollar General , which caters to families with the lowest incomes, and Target , which pulls its customers from a higher rung on the socioeconomic ladder. Over the past five years, Dollar General's sales per store have shot up by 37%. Meanwhile, Target's are up by only 4.1%, or less than inflation.
At the end of the day, while the headlines cited at the beginning of this article are certainly encouraging, it's important that we not get ahead of ourselves.
The Motley Fool's top stock for 2013
The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.
The article You Were Lied to: Household Wealth Has Not Recovered originally appeared on Fool.com.John Maxfield has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.