Chrysler Recalls 630,000 Jeeps to Fix Air Bags, Seat Belts

chrysler jeep recall wrangler patriot compass air bags transmission fluld leak
Frederic J. Brown, AFP/Getty Images
By TOM KRISHER

DETROIT -- Just two days after refusing a government request to recall 2.7 million older-model Jeeps, Chrysler has decided to do two other recalls totaling 630,000 vehicles worldwide.

The automaker will recall more than 409,000 Jeep Patriot and Compass small SUVs across the globe from the 2010 and 2012 model years to fix air bag and seat-belt problems. It's also recalling 221,000 Jeep Wranglers worldwide from 2012 and 2013 to fix transmission fluid leaks, according to documents posted Thursday on the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration website.

In the Patriots and Compasses, a software error could cause late deployment of the side air bags and seat-belt tightening mechanisms, and that could cause injuries in rollover crashes. Dealers will repair the software for free starting in July.


For Wranglers with 3.6-liter V-6 engines, Chrysler says a power steering fluid line can wear a hole in the transmission oil cooler line. The SUVs can leak fluid, damaging automatic transmissions. Dealers will inspect the lines for free and replace them or install a protective sleeve. The recall begins in July.

No crashes or injuries have been reported in either case, Chrysler spokesman Eric Mayne said Thursday.

The Compass and Patriot recall includes 254,400 vehicles in the U.S., 45,400 in Canada and another 109,400 outside North America, according to Chrysler.

The Wrangler recall includes 181,000 vehicles in the U.S. as well as 18,400 in Canada, 3,300 in Mexico and another 18,400 outside North America.

Concerned customers in either case can call Chrysler at 800-853-1403.

On Tuesday, Chrysler refused a request from NHTSA to recall 2.7 million older Jeep Grand Cherokee and Liberty SUVs, saying the vehicles are safe and met federal safety standards when they were built. The government, however, says the 1993-2004 Grand Cherokees and 2002-2007 Liberty models have fuel tanks that can leak and catch fire in rear-end collisions. The tanks are mounted behind the rear axle, which NHTSA says is a design flaw.

Refusing a recall is rare for an automaker, but Chrysler maintains that NHTSA's conclusions are based on flawed data. The company says it's still working with NHTSA to resolve the issue, but the matter could wind up in court.

The company previously refused a NHTSA request in 1996, when the agency asked it to recall 91,000 Dodge Stratus and Chrysler Cirrus cars for an alleged seat belt defect. NHTSA sued the company and won in federal court. But in 1998, an appeals court reversed the decision, saying NHTSA had unfairly held Chrysler to a new standard.

Chrysler says there are no safety defects with the older Jeeps. But Mayne said defects were identified on the newer Jeeps and the company responded accordingly.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

Economics 101

Intro to economics. But fun.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

8 Comments

Filter by:
norman

I used to work at an AMC dealer in Westwood, ca. in 1977. The jeeps looked "very similar" to what they look like now. "MUY similar?"

June 06 2013 at 1:45 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
GEORGE

Let's do the math; 3 Million jeeps with average miles on each of (let’s say) 100,000 miles. That’s 300 BILLION miles for all the concerned Jeeps. Divide 300 Billion by 51 deaths we get ONE death for every 5,882,XXX,XXX miles. The average person drives about 500,000 miles in his(her) lifetime. Assuming they're ONLY driving the problem Jeeps then they will die in the Jeep once in about 12 THOUSAND lifetimes. In reality they will drive nineteen OTHER cars in their lifetime and not just Jeeps so their chances decrease by one in twenty so in the end they have about 240,000 lifetimes till they die of a "Rear-End Collision" in a problem Jeep. Do the math with many other cars on the road and you will see the Jeep is probably just as "Safe" as most other cars in this respect. I'll keep driving my Jeep Thank You.

June 06 2013 at 1:18 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to GEORGE's comment
h.hughjardon

You need a hobby george.

June 06 2013 at 2:14 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
GEORGE

Let's do the math; 3 Million jeeps with average miles on each of (let’s say) 100,000 miles. That’s 300 BILLION miles for all the concerned Jeeps. Divide 300 Billion by 51 deaths we get ONE death for every 5,882,XXX,XXX miles. The average person drives about 500,000 miles in his(her) lifetime. Assuming they're ONLY driving the problem Jeeps then they will die in the Jeep once in about 12 THOUSAND lifetimes. In reality they will drive nineteen OTHER cars in their lifetime and not just Jeeps so their chances decrease by one in twenty so in the end they have about 240,000 lifetimes till they die of a "Rear-End Collision" in a problem Jeep. Do the math with many other cars on the road and you will see the Jeep is probably just as "Safe" as most other cars in this respect. I'll keep driving my Jeep Thank You.

June 06 2013 at 1:18 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to GEORGE's comment
GEORGE

Sorry about the Double Post, having some "mouse" problems this morning.

June 06 2013 at 1:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
terryriddle

Sounds like the Ford Pinto story line. Cheaper to pay for lives lost than do a recall!!!!!!!!!!!!

June 06 2013 at 12:52 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Wayne

It would be a financial disaster for Chrysler to recall all the gas tanks the government is asking them to do. If meeting safety standards when built, I support Chrysler. But they will pay dearly regardless as potential consumers already question their corporate integrity.

June 06 2013 at 12:16 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
h.hughjardon

So I guess what we can tske away from all the jeep news this week is don't get into an accident in one of these.....keep chugging those 40's and burning those fatties on your break boys.

June 06 2013 at 12:15 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply