"Upgauging" -- replacing small airplanes with larger ones -- has become an important trend in the airline industry in the past five years. Airlines have found that larger aircraft usually have lower unit costs, which improves profitability. Fifty-seat regional jets have come in for particular scorn, as they have very high unit costs and provide a poor passenger experience.
Historically, the popularity of 50-seat regional jets was driven by "scope clauses", agreements between airlines and their pilot unions that restricted the airlines from outsourcing flying on large regional jets. However, the most recent round of airline labor negotiations has led to relaxed scope clauses at Delta Air Lines , United Continental , and AMR.
Delta has been the leader in seeking to reduce its reliance on 50-seat (and smaller) aircraft. However, United has also drawn attention as it ordered 30 E175 76-seat planes from Embraer last month, and then agreed this week to add 40 more E175s operated by SkyWest . These two agreements pave the way for United to add 70 large regional jets over the next two years, while removing 100 or more 50-seat aircraft. Nevertheless, United will remain significantly behind Delta in terms of fleet restructuring, which will leave it with a higher cost structure and lower profitability.
Delta kills the 50-seat regional jet
Over the last year, Delta has introduced a fleet restructuring plan that will remove all but 125 of its 50-seat regional jets from service by 2015. The company was able to sublease 88 used Boeing 717s (seating 110 passengers) from Southwest Airlines at a great price, as Southwest wanted to return to flying only Boeing 737s.
In return for adding this additional "mainline" flying -- performed by Delta pilots and flight attendants -- Delta's pilot union agreed to allow the company to add more 76-seat regional jets. In December, Delta signed a firm order for 40 new Bombardier CRJ900s, with options for 30 more. If all the options are exercised, Delta will reach a maximum limit of 325 76-seat regional jets permitted by its pilot contract.
As this figure shows, the Boeing 717s and CRJ900s ("Two-class RJ") being added to the fleet will replace flying currently done by 50-seat regional jets. Since the updated fleet will feature larger planes, Delta will be able to produce the same amount of capacity despite having significantly fewer departures and a smaller fleet. This will lower the company's unit costs.
United follows, but at a distance
Today, United relies very heavily on small regional aircraft (50 seats or less), most of which are 50-seat regional jets. As of the end of 2013, United's regional fleet will consist of 389 aircraft with 50 or fewer seats, compared with just 185 large (i.e. more than 50 seats) turboprops and regional jets.
United's two recent orders will raise its large regional aircraft count to 255 by the end of 2015, which is the maximum permitted by its labor contract. Those additional 76-seat regional jets will allow United to cut back to 250-300 planes with 50 or fewer seats. However, that will still be more than double the size of Delta's small regional jet fleet, putting United at a cost disadvantage.
Can United catch up?
Given the highly competitive nature of the airline industry, having too many inefficient 50-seat aircraft could be a huge drag on profitability. United's pilot contract does allow the company to go beyond 255 large regional aircraft. The airline can add up to 70 more large regional aircraft (bringing the total to 325) if it also adds 88 small narrowbodies to be flown by United pilots. This language mimics Delta's fleet restructuring plan.
However, Delta's fleet restructuring was enabled by its deal with Southwest for used (i.e. cheap) Boeing 717s. United would most likely buy new Embraer 190/195 or Bombardier CSeries planes for $30 million-$40 million each if it decides to continue upgauging its domestic fleet. In other words, United will have to spend billions of dollars on capex to fully catch up with Delta in the race to get rid of 50-seat aircraft. Since United already has very high capex commitments through the end of the decade, management may understandably shy away from additional fleet restructuring actions.
Who's the real winner?
While United is clearly following the same path as Delta toward "upgauging", it will have trouble matching Delta's 50-seat fleet reductions. Delta benefited from good timing, insofar as Southwest was looking to get rid of its Boeing 717s at the same time that Delta was thinking of adding planes of that size. United will either have to invest a significant amount of capital in small mainline aircraft or maintain its higher usage of 50-seat (and smaller) regional aircraft.
The real winners in all of this are Embraer and Bombardier, which have a near duopoly on the regional jet market. United's recent orders have done wonders for Embraer by helping it to rebuild its order backlog. Moreover, United's pilot contract paves the way for the company to add 100-seat aircraft from Embraer or Bombardier eventually. The obsolescence of the 50-seat regional jet should drive strong demand for replacements for the rest of the decade.
What macro trend was Warren Buffett referring to when he said "this is the tapeworm that's eating at American competitiveness"? Find out in our free report: "What's Really Eating At America's Competitiveness." You'll also discover an idea to profit as companies work to eradicate this efficiency-sucking tapeworm. Just click here for free, immediate access.
The article United Embraces Bigger Regional Jets but Still Lags Delta originally appeared on Fool.com.Motley Fool contributor Adam Levine-Weinberg is short shares of United Continental Holdings and has the following options: Long Sep 2013 $33 Puts on United Continental Holdings. The Motley Fool recommends Embraer-Empresa Brasileira and Southwest Airlines. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.