Extended Unemployment Benefits Don't Discourage Job Seeking: Study

Job seekers
Getty Images
By Senior Editor

Despite arguments to the contrary, giving unemployed Americans extended jobless benefits of up to 99 weeks didn't prevent them from taking jobs, according a new report.

Released last month through the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, the study says that the extended benefits given from 2009 to 2012 to the unemployed increased the overall employment rate by only 0.04 percentage points, which the report says is small in comparison to the peak recession unemployment rate of 10 percent.

"There was some criticism that people on long-term unemployment benefits would not want to go back to work," said Henry Farber, a professor of economics at Princeton University and co-author of the report.

"But that's not true. We could find no real effect of the benefits from keeping people wanting to work," said Farber. "People are not staying on unemployment to avoid taking jobs."

Farber said his report looked at previous downturns in the economy when extended unemployment benefits were shorter -- up to 79 weeks in early 2001-2002 -- than came out of the recession of 2007-2009. The findings for both periods were similar, he said.

"There was never much serious work done to look at this issue of extended benefits and the effect on the jobless rate," Farber said. "That's why we did this. We wanted to find out if there was a correlation and we didn't find one."

'They Add to the Long-Term Unemployment Situation'

The current rate of unemployment is around 7.5 percent according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, down from the 10 percent recessional peak in 2009.

Still, while the job picture is improving for some, the long-term unemployed aren't so lucky. That's because as the jobless rate improves, the federal government -- which funds much of the unemployment benefit extensions -- cuts back spending for benefits.

Congress has traditionally extended unemployment benefits in times of recession. In 2010 and 2011, benefits in some states reached 99 weeks of combined state and federal benefits -- the highest extension on record.

But less than half of the 11.7 million unemployed in April received state or federal benefits, according to the Labor Department.

Any current extended benefits will continue for those receiving them, but they will not be renewed at the end of this year. And there will be no more extended benefits for those going on unemployment now, unless job losses mount to recession-era levels.

California and Nevada are among the states that have the highest duration of benefits, at 76 weeks, while Utah, Wyoming, South Dakota and Kansas are among the states with the lowest duration, at 40 weeks.

Not every one sees extensions as beneficial -- despite any evidence to the contrary. Timothy Nash, an economics professor at Northwood University, said he believes extended benefits keep the unemployed from looking for work.

"There's a lot of debate about the impact of extensions but my gut feeling is that giving them hurts the job picture," said Nash. "If we look at countries like Sweden that had long term extensions and high unemployment, when they ended the extensions the jobless rate went down."

"I think some people need them," Nash went on to say. "People with certain skills that can use the extensions to take the time to find a job that's right for them. But without extensions, people feel a better sense of urgency that they have to find a job."

"Having these extensions, while they give some people a way to live, are not the best thing to do," Nash argued. "I think they add to the long-term unemployment situation instead of ending it."

Currently, there are some 4.4 million Americans listed as long-term unemployed-defined as those who have been out of work for 27 weeks or more., according to the BLS.

While that's better than the high of 6.7 million in April of 2010, it's still not enough of an improvement, said Chris Rhomberg, a sociology professor and labor expert at Fordham University.

"The long-term unemployed need help, and they're not getting it," Rhomberg argued. "You've got a situation where employers can reject people who have been out of work for a long time and they don't suffer any consequences."

"Businesses are not hiring and extensions are down. It's cruel," said Rhomberg.

More from CNBC

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

How to Buy a Car

How to get the best deal and buy a car with confidence.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

Ha!!, you can't get most people to work when they have a job. paying them for not working leads to them getting back to work. Ridiculous!! These days you do not hire workers anymore, you basically marry them. It used to be you hired people when you needed them and let them go when you did not. Now, you can't fire them anymore, they claim this or that hurts them, and they sue. Oh, and lets not forget harrassment. Employees and taxes, quickest way to go broke.

May 15 2013 at 7:13 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

I know alot of people that do not want to go back to work when drawing unemployment. They will put it off until they get close to the end of there unemployment benifits and then start looking for real.

May 15 2013 at 4:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

As a former "99er", I had to take two part time jobs when I could not find one full time job. Neither job has benefits. Unemployment benefits do not last forever, and do not come with benefits such as health insurance, which is costly to purchase on your own. Also, unemployment benefits do not pay anywhere near what a person was making before they lost their job. Extended unemployment benefits do not discourage those who are unemployed from seeking employment, unless you are able to swing early retirement or go back to school.

May 15 2013 at 2:12 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply


May 15 2013 at 1:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

No they don't! What discourages them is being offered jobs that pay $8.00/hr when they had been making $20.00. You cannot make a living on $8.00! That's why they keep collecting!

May 15 2013 at 1:25 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply