Here's How Much It Would Cost to Replace Your Mom

×
Replacing mom
Alamy
By MANDI WOODRUFF

It's hard to argue with the fact that stay-at-home parenting is one of the most undervalued careers in the U.S. Moms (and yes, some dads, too) do double duty as chauffeurs, cooks, psychologists, money managers and more, on average clocking a 94-hour work week, according to Salary.com.

Based on the 10 most time consuming tasks listed by more than 6,000 mothers, Salary.com estimated it would cost $113,586 a year to replace them. That's a paltry $624 (0.5%) raise since the same study in 2012.

To put that in perspective, a physician earns about $153,000 for 56 hours of work per week.

Salary.com also estimated the value of working mothers' household duties, finding they deserve an extra $67,436 per year for the 58 hours of work they take on outside of their 9-to-5 jobs. That's a meager $457 raise (0.07%) over 2012.

But here's the sad part –– most mothers don't even give themself that much credit.

A similar study by Insure.com found that 11% of women valued moms' household work at under $10,000 a year. Just 7% said it was worth a six-figure salary.

Insure.com was far less generous with its salary estimate, pinning the 2013 market value of a mom at $59,862, down for the second year in a row.

"Just because someone doesn't earn a salary doesn't mean that they don't make significant contributions to the family that could be costly to replace," Marvin Feldman, president and CEO of the LIFE Foundation, said. "You must think about whether your spouse could afford to pay someone else to provide these services in your absence."

It seems the recession was just as damaging to the stay-at-home parent business as other jobs. This year's salary for moms is well below the $138,000 payday Salary.com estimated just six years ago.

At the same time, salaries for various jobs moms perform for their families –– laundry service, household cleaning, financial management, etc. –– declined as well, which explains why studies like these fluctuate with the economy.

When the economy tanked, so did the number of stay-at-home moms. In 2010, there were 5 million stay-at-home mothers (and 154,000 dads) in the U.S., down from 5.6 million in 2007, according to the Fiscal Times. A new survey by CouponCabin found more than half of working mothers consider themselves the primary breadwinners in their household.

Here's the breakdown of Insure.com's Mother's Day Index:



More from Business Insider:
5 Reasons Retirees Should be Flocking to Tennessee
13 Money Lies You Should Stop Telling Yourself By Age 40
13 Money Secrets from the Amish


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Goal Setting

Want to succeed? Then you need goals!

View Course »

Intro to different retirement accounts

What does it mean to have a 401(k)? IRA?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

5 Comments

Filter by:
sarahjohnson79

Only a life lived for others is a life worthwhile … Albert Einstein
For other insights see: https://www.sites.google.com/site/alexkrzyston9

May 12 2013 at 4:59 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Richard

"But here's the sad part –– most mothers don't even give themself that much credit."
That's because most mothers have more common sense than the writer of this article.

May 11 2013 at 1:22 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
janeswizzle

Our president wants Uncle Sam to be your new Mom.

May 11 2013 at 1:21 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Jeremiah

"Based on the 10 most time consuming tasks listed by more than 6,000 mothers, Salary.com estimated it would cost $113,586 a year to replace them. That's a paltry $624 (0.5%) raise since the same study in 2012".

"To put that in perspective, a physician earns about $153,000 for 56 hours of work per week".

"Salary.com also estimated the value of working mothers' household duties, finding they deserve an extra $67,436 per year for the 58 hours of work they take on outside of their 9-to-5 jobs. That's a meager $457 raise (0.07%) over 2012."

Firstly: the 58 hours a week claimed to be the average extra time worked by a mother (parent) to administer the running of a household is so terribly subjective and arbitrary, as to render the results senseless, absurd and impossible.

Secondly: on top of the arbitrary extra hours worked few, if any parents, are professionals in all of the fields in which you claim they practice: ie they are not professional trained doctors, nurses, lawyers, taxi drivers, psychologists, maids, cooks, consultants, planners, maintenance workers, teachers, child care workers nor private detectives. Therefore they should not earn the top wage rates that these professionals earn, in the article $67,436.00 divided by 3016hrs (58 hrs a week, times 52 weeks) = $22.36 per hour.

Thirdly: For $113,586 a year you could hire full time CNAs to help 24/7/52. 24 x 7 x 52 = 8,736 hours x $13.00/hr = $113,568.00, $18.00 a year less than Salary.Com estimates it would cost to replace the parent.

This whole article just doesn’t add up! I don't think I would trust a thing that Salary.com offers....

May 10 2013 at 12:05 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jeremiah's comment
janeswizzle

Just a new way the government is planning to tax MOM\'S. Under this administration it wouldn\'t surprise me one bit.

May 11 2013 at 2:38 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply