Yesterday, the S&P 500 climbed above the 1,600 mark for the first time, setting the latest in a series of recent all-time record highs. But the most surprising thing about the market's move on Friday is just how long it took to get there.
It took more than 13 years for the S&P to go from 1,500 to 1,600. That's a move of less than 7%, yet it's the longest that the S&P has taken to make a 100-point move since 1985. During those 13 years, two huge bear markets got in the way of stocks' progress, and a changing of the guard led to great disparities in performance among S&P 500 stocks. Let's take a look back at market history to see just how psychologically important breaching the 1,600 mark may prove to be.
Counting by hundreds
Back in the 1990s, jumping by 100-point intervals seemed like child's play. It took the S&P from 1968 to 1985 to go from 100 to 200, but given that the market had to double to reach that new benchmark, it's easy to understand why it took so long for stocks to jump that high. The market's bull run led it to 300 by early 1987, and even the market's crash later that year didn't stop it from hitting 400 by late 1991.
From there, stocks truly exploded higher, setting new 100-point milestones several times each year. In less than five years, the S&P went from 500 to 1,500, on the back of big technology stocks that soared many times the overall return of the market.
Yet after that, investors are quite familiar with what happened next. The tech bust sent stocks crashing back to earth, and even after fully rebounding by late 2007, the financial crisis reared its head and sent stocks staggering once more. Only after a magnificent bounce from 2009's lows has the S&P 500 finally gotten past the 1,600 barrier once and for all.
Which stocks got us here?
Yet the path to 1,600 has been littered with poor-performing S&P components. Financial stocks are the obvious victims, with AIG and E*TRADE Financial near the bottom of the list from a return standpoint. You'll also find several technology companies with losses of 75% or more over the past 13 years, demonstrating the failure of many once-ascendant young prospects to reach anything close to their full potential.
On the other hand, toward the top of the return list, you'll find many old-economy stocks that were largely out of favor in 2000. Reynolds American has soared almost 2,500% since then, having overcome the threat of major tobacco-litigation losses largely unscathed. Pharmacy benefit manager Express Scripts has climbed more than 2,200%, with several health-insurance companies also posting strong performance as the health-care industry has changed to favor companies that help manage costs of providing medical services.
How long until 1,700?
Bullish investors certainly hope that it won't take another 13 years for the S&P to reach 1,700. Yet investors will simply have to wait and see whether we've broken a logjam that will rapidly lead to successive 100-point milestones in the months and years to come.
Despite its long-term losses, AIG was the favorite stock among hedge fund managers at the end of last year. Have they identified the next big multi-bagger, or are the risks facing the insurance giant still too great? In The Motley Fool's premium report on AIG, financials bureau chief Matt Koppenheffer breaks down the key issues that you need to know about if you want to successfully invest in this stock. Simply click here now to claim your copy, and you'll also receive a full year of key updates and expert analysis as news continues to develop.
The article The S&P's Hardest-Fought Milestone in 28 Years originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Dan Caplinger owns warrants on AIG. You can follow him on Twitter: @DanCaplinger. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of AIG and Express Scripts and has options on AIG. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.