Vodafone Group May Not Receive Verizon Wireless Dividend In 2013
May 3rd 2013 11:20AM
Updated May 3rd 2013 12:05PM
LONDON -- Verizon Communications has begun to play hardball in its tete-a-tete with Vodafone over the possible buyout of the British-based telecoms company's 45% interest in their joint venture, by declaring that Verizon Wireless is not guaranteed to pay a dividend this year.
In a move that's widely recognized as an attempt to force Vodafone's hand into selling its stake, Verizon CEO Lowell McAdam instead said that the top priority for Wireless is to pay down debt to the tune of $5 billion that's due between now and mid-2014, suggesting that paying a dividend to its owners from its sizable cash flow may play second fiddle.
While reaffirming their preference to buy out Vodafone's interest, Verizon also stated that it will not be bullied into paying over the odds after expressing "discipline on price," according to Philip Cusack, an analyst at J.P. Morgan, which hosted a meeting with Verizon earlier this week. Cusack continued: "Management believes that a premium would not be warranted for the minority stake given Verizon's management control," further outlining the U.S. company's tough stance.
This comes after six major shareholders in Vodafone declared that Verizon would need to stump up more than the widely reported $100 billion figure to buy out its stake in Wireless, citing an estimate closer to $120 billion.
Investors are keeping a close eye on proceedings, as the share price continues to hover around a 10-year high with the knowledge that any surplus cash from a buyout could make its way back to shareholders.
However, some Fools are wary of a Vodafone without its prime asset, with kiffberet commenting: "I'd probably sell up just after the deal is announced... Bought at 159 pence and 167 pence six months ago, so it's all good profit to me... (and I don't trust managment to spend their windfall well)" and ANuvver stating: "[I've] said it before, and I'll say it again: VOD without its Wireless stake is not worth holding."
Does anyone have a different opinion, should the deal go through? Or do you agree with these two Fools? Either way, feel free to enter your comments in the box below!
If you are considering selling shares in Vodafone in the near future, though, then why not start doing your research for alternatives within the FTSE 100 by reading this exclusive wealth report, which reviews five particularly attractive opportunities.
All five of these blue-chip companies offer a mix of robust prospects, illustrious histories and dependable dividends, and have just been declared by the Motley Fool's top analysts as "5 Shares You Can Retire On." The report is completely free, but will only remain available for a limited time -- simply click here to get it sent to your inbox immediately.
The article Vodafone Group May Not Receive Verizon Wireless Dividend In 2013 originally appeared on Fool.com.Sam Robson owns shares of Vodafone. The Motley Fool recommends Vodafone. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.