The Case That Could Cost Bank of America $60 Billion

This month is an important one for Bank of America , particularly as it pertains to one of many lawsuits concerning deteriorating mortgage-backed securities and the decaying mortgages that reside therein.

Prior settlement thrown into doubt
The case involves a settlement struck in 2011, for $8.5 billion, between B of A and 22 investors, pursuant to 530 mortgage trusts sold by Countrywide. This settlement is now in question, since some investors came up with evidence that the bank did them wrong by putting its own interests before theirs -- for example, by modifying mortgages contained within the MBSes, then neglecting to buy them back from the investors, as the plaintiffs allege was the agreement between the parties.

Alison Frankel outlines all the painful contortions this suit has undergone since last year, and the next installment will occur on May 30. It is then that New York State Supreme Court Justice Barbara Kapnick will begin hearing arguments regarding whether or not the settlement should be overturned.


This question is based upon whether or not the Bank of New York Mellon , acting as trustee for the investors, agreed to the terms of the settlement in good faith. Under New York's Article 77, the trustee must have acted "reasonably," which gives the judge wide latitude, it seems. How that law is interpreted will decide whether or not the settlement stays -- or goes.

Big investors and big bucks
Members of the group of 22 investors include big asset managers BlackRock, PIMCO, and giant life insurance company Metlife, with the total amount of losses estimated to be around $108 billion. If the ruling comes down against trustee Bank of New York Mellon and the settlement is nullified, how much might Bank of America have to pay?

This is just speculation, of course, but the answer seems to be: A lot. One expert estimated earlier this year that the damage could come in at somewhere between $25 billion and $30 billion, while analyst Mark Palmer at BTIG Research figures it may hit more than $60 billion. How does he get to this number?

Using figures from the Bank of America v. MBIA suit, Palmer notes that the monoline insurer's lawyers have estimated that 56% of the Countrywide MBSes MBIA insured had issues so odious that a lender would be too embarrassed not to repurchase them. Applying the same formula to $108 billion, the penalty comes in at $60.5 billion.

As Palmer says, even half of that amount would be onerous for Bank of America. While the $60 billion number looks awfully high, its seems a sure bet that, if things don't go its way later this month, B of A will be paying out more than the original $8.5 billion settlement amount -- perhaps quite a lot more. In the crowd of lawsuits surrounding Bank of America, this is one that investors should definitely keep an eye on.

The Motley Fool's chief investment officer has selected his No. 1 stock for the next year. Find out which stock it is in the brand-new free report: "The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2013." Just click here to access the report and find out the name of this under-the-radar company.

link

The article The Case That Could Cost Bank of America $60 Billion originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Amanda Alix has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends BlackRock. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to ETFs

The basics of Exchange Traded Funds and why ETFs are hot.

View Course »

Understanding Stock Market Indexes

What does it mean when people say "the market is up 2%"?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

1 Comment

Filter by:
Jack Getze

Hype from BAC bears, Amanda. Why would all those investors settle for 8 cents on the dollar? Because they are "qualified investors" who signed the investment papers, acknowledging that these securities were risky and, after readimng and examining thousands of papers and documentation, agreeing in writing not to sue no matter what. BAC would rather settle because lawyers cost them 900 million a quarter, but this case is a winner for BAC in court.

May 04 2013 at 10:04 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply