- Days left

White House Shows Taxpayers Where Their Money Went - Sort Of

White House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest (L) declined to comment on why the administration made it challenging for Americans using the service to see how much wealthy taxpayers contribute toward federal spending programs.
AlamyWhite House Principal Deputy Press Secretary Josh Earnest (L) declined to comment on why the administration made it challenging for Americans using the service to see how much wealthy taxpayers contribute toward federal spending programs.
On Monday, the White House rolled out "Your 2012 Federal Taxpayer Receipt," an online tool that purports to provide "a breakdown of how your tax dollars are spent on priorities like education, veterans benefits, or health care."

A few observations:

First, the receipt calculator bases its results on how much a user reports having paid in Social Security, Medicare and income taxes. If you don't remember what you paid in these three categories, you can select an income estimate, choosing among five statuses that range from "$25,000 income – single with no children" to "$80,000 income – married with two children." But that's it: No income level higher than $80,000 is provided. Which means there's no way for a curious citizen to get an estimate of the tax burden shouldered by high earners.

White House

Maybe that's all right; the White House only promises visitors insight into the uses of their own tax dollars, not anybody else's. (And it would be impossible for a simple tool to model the nexus of loopholes and deductions that factor into the tax rates of many wealthy citizens.) But it's noteworthy that, at a time when the president himself is calling attention to the need for higher-income earners to pay their "fair share," his administration leaves upper tax brackets out of the income estimate menu.

For what's it worth, the Daily Mail reports that it took "35 minutes to calculate the taxes paid by a hypothetical $240,000 salaried earner who is married and filing taxes jointly with a spouse, using the same conditions as in the White House's example for an $80,000 earner." According to the paper, "that $240,000 salaried employee would contribute toward every federal program more than 10 times what the $80,000 employee chips in, despite earning just three times as much money." To the Mail, which notes that White House spokespeople declined to comment on the record about the exclusion of high income figures, this is evidence that the administration doesn't want the public to know how much the rich pay in taxes.
Second, that appealing-sounding group of priorities given above -- education, veterans benefits, health care -- doesn't include the category that consumes the biggest share of the income tax paid on my own estimated tax receipt: "national defense" (24.64%). And when I click on "national defense" to see a breakdown of that spending, the top item listed is "Military personnel salaries and benefits (5.62%)", although the second, "Ongoing operations, equipment, and supplies (10.26%)," is nearly twice as expensive. (Even the third, "Research, development, weapons and construction," is pricier, at 7.62%.)

Apparently the administration would rather have us thinking of our tax dollars compensating the members of our volunteer armed forces than paying for battles and bombs. (The order of items is similarly perplexing under "Jobs and Family Security," giving priority to the middlingly expensive unemployment insurance.) And while it makes sense to separate the cost of current war fighting from other military expenditures, veterans' benefits (4.53%) is listed as a separate category, rather than a subsection of national defense.

Third, the payroll taxes that fund Social Security and Medicare are treated separately from income taxes. Here again The Daily Mail sees signs of an effort to dupe taxpayers, quoting a spokesman for the National Taxpayers Union as suggesting that the Obama administration wants to to "cut data from the spending side, likely to avoid showing how much SS and Medicare take out of the budget. Workers and business owners who are paying Social Security and Medicare taxes right out of their paychecks are likely not interested in separating them into a special category and pretending they never happened."

Some Medicare spending does show up on my tax receipt, as the second most expensive item listed under health care. But it's true that I contributed significantly more than that in Medicare tax. Still, given the way taxes are collected and divvied up, it's hard to see how else the White House could have presented this information; it's not a budget breakdown. If people want a visualization of how much money the president thinks should be spent on different programs, the New York Times crafted a good interactive infographic on his budget proposal last year.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Understanding Credit Scores

Credit scores matter -- learn how to improve your score.

View Course »

Managing your Portfolio

Keeping your portfolio and financial life fit!

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Cities with the Lowest Tax Rates

The total amount of tax you pay reaches far beyond what you owe the federal government. Depending on where you live, most likely you're required to pay additional taxes, including property and sales tax. The disparity between the amount of tax you pay in a low-tax city and that in a high-tax city can be dramatic. Living in any of these 10 cities could save you a bundle, although the exact amount may fluctuate based on your income and lifestyle choices.

Cities with the Highest Tax Rates

Much ado is made in the press about federal tax brackets, but cities can carry a tax bite of their own. Even if you live in a state that has no income tax, your city may levy a variety of taxes that could eat away the entire benefit of living in an income tax-free state, including property taxes, sales taxes and auto taxes. Consider all the costs before you move to one of these cities, and understand that rates may change based on your family's income level.

Great Ways to Get Charitable Tax Deductions

Generally, when you give money to a charity, you can use the amount of that donation as a deduction on your tax return. However, not all charities qualify as tax-deductible organizations. While there are many types of charities, they must all meet certain criteria to be classified by the IRS as tax-deductible organizations. There are legitimate tax-deductible organizations in many popular categories, such as those listed below.

A Freelancer's Guide to Taxes

Freelancing certainly has its benefits, but it can result in a few complications come tax time. The Internal Revenue Service considers freelancers to be self-employed, so if you earn income as a freelancer you must file your taxes as a business owner. While you can take additional deductions if you are self-employed, you'll also face additional taxes in the form of the self-employment tax. Here are things to consider as a freelancer when filing your taxes.

Tax Deductions for Voluntary Interest Payments on Student Loans

Most taxpayers who pay interest on student loans can take a tax deduction for the expense ? and you can do this regardless of whether you itemize tax deductions on your return. The rules for claiming the deduction are the same whether the interest payments were required or voluntary.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

i know
waiting impatiently.
for TSHTF SCENARIO to arrive.

April 22 2013 at 11:30 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Our tax dollars are going to the Obama's million dollar vacations, Obama flying around Airforce One still campaigning even though the election is over, their lavish parties at the White House, and their luxurious life style.

April 21 2013 at 5:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to bambamsgolfcart's comment

you realize he's OUT THERE CAMPAIGNING still ?

April 22 2013 at 11:36 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Edmond S. Abrain

Surely the Obama administration is responsible for not telling the people the facts and nothing but the facts. Do they distort the facts to support their arguement that the "Rich" are not paying their fair share? Yes they do. I'm not surprised by their actions since they, like many politicians, will do almost anything to get elected and have control and power to shape our country as they think it should be. What is most dissapointing to me is the media's complicity. The people are feed distorttions and the media neglects it's responsibilty to correct the record. The only value a media serves in a free democracy is to be sure the people are accurately informed. With out that balance the people cast their votes without knowing the truth and now we pay the price.

April 17 2013 at 2:37 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Will this administration ever stop lying and giving out half truths?

April 17 2013 at 1:41 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

Wow...Some very thoughtful comments on this sight today. I suggest we stop thinking that welfare and other social programs are putting this country in the red and take a long hard look at defense spending and all its long term fiscal commitments. By some estimates the price tag is over 800 Billion for fiscal year 2014, insane.

April 17 2013 at 1:20 PM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to jakesue1's comment

and whose estimate is that jakeepoo ?
what percentage of te GNP goes for defense ?
write back.......

April 22 2013 at 11:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

Does anyone really doubt-especially after this article-that the White House is not being deceitful?

To completely ignore the portion of the population that pays 70% of the income taxes each year is reprehensible. But then again, the White House hates success. They can't use the carrot of entitlements to buy votes from successful people.

April 17 2013 at 1:06 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply

There was no reason not to have the system show incomes of a million the 47% that are his followers will never read or understand it even it they did read it. Then there is the fact they don't care one group continues waiting for everything to come from the government & the other just wants to maintain control. Those that work & invest carrier the entire load for the rest.

April 17 2013 at 12:38 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
Bill Ridenour

So what else is new? The President and his administration are conducting a class war against the so called wealthy-except themselves and their supporters, of course. Why would they want to tell the world that a supposedly high income earner pays ten times as much in taxes as a lower incoem earner? That would spoil the convenien tfiction they have stet up with the so called wealthy the villains.

April 17 2013 at 12:29 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply

It is most unfortunate that we have such a man running our country, we are heading to become a third world nation, "his ultimate wish as president". Besides this, we must either remove all congressmen that refuse to enact constitutional amenment, "28th Amendment", to do away with ALL congressional exemptions. Synopsis; Better Men, and Women needed to be elected, ones that represent our needs, not their pocket books, and their "me first attitude", and a president that speaks truthfull statements, not rhetoric that he wants people to believe.

April 17 2013 at 12:25 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply

The reason people who make a hundred grand or above cant see their burden is because the liar in chief knows even the simpletons that support him would see the truth that over 70% of all taxes collected are already paid by those he has repeatedly claimed "need to pay their fair share" if that liar even began to believe that load of poop why did he only pay 18 %? Its because he is a pathological liar and a life long wealth redistributing socialist .

April 17 2013 at 12:03 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply