Campaign Promises Revisited: Obama's Mixed Economic Record

WASHINGTON, DC - APRIL 03: U.S. President Barack Obama walks from the Oval Office to the White House residence before departing on Marine One April 3, 2013 in Washington, DC. Obama is scheduled to travel today to Colorado and California. (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)
Getty Images
By CHRISTOPHER S. RUGABER

One in a series examining President Barack Obama's campaign promises and what he is doing, or not doing, to keep them.

The issue:

The U.S. economy is recovering from the Great Recession but at a modest, uneven pace. Many scars remain visible, particularly an unemployment rate of 7.6 percent. The U.S. has 2.8 million fewer jobs than in December 2007, when the recession began. And average hourly wages have trailed inflation in the past three years.

Meanwhile, the federal budget deficit has ballooned, topping $1 trillion each year in President Barack Obama's first term. It is forecast to fall to $845 billion this year. Obama faces the challenge of reducing that gap without cutting it so quickly that it slows growth.
___

The campaign promise:

Obama promised a balanced approach to deficit reduction that wouldn't undermine the recovery or place most of the burden on the middle class.

He also sought to revitalize manufacturing, harkening back to an era when high-paying factory jobs were a gateway to the middle class. Obama promised to cut the corporate tax rate for U.S. manufacturers to 25 percent from 35 percent, while penalizing those who shift work overseas. He also proposed more job training and called for the creation of 15-20 manufacturing research hubs, all as part of his promise to create 1 million new manufacturing jobs by the end of 2016:

"We can help big factories and small businesses double their exports. And if we choose this path, we can create a million new manufacturing jobs in the next four years. You can make that happen. You can choose that future." --Democratic convention speech, Sept. 6, 2012.

---

The prospects:

Obama has had mixed success in reducing the deficit without unduly impacting growth. He struck a deal with Congress to avoid the "fiscal cliff," a set of tax increases and spending cuts scheduled for Jan. 1. Relieved businesses responded by stepping up hiring and spending.

But he and Republican congressional leaders allowed Social Security taxes to rise 2 percentage points at the beginning of the year, cutting take-home pay for nearly all working Americans. Middle and lower-income Americans were hardest hit because the tax is levied only against the first $114,000 of income.

And Obama wasn't able to avoid $85 billion in automatic spending cuts that kicked in March 1. Economists warn the cuts could shave a half-percentage point from growth this year. Obama said in a presidential campaign debate that the cuts "will not happen." But they have. They could be reversed in a future agreement.

In his budget plan, Obama now proposes cutting future Social Security benefits by changing how they are calculated. Some liberal Democrats in Congress expressed opposition, charging that the move would harm lower-income recipients.

And Obama's proposal to cut taxes for manufacturers has been caught up in a stalemate with congressional Republicans over deficit reduction.

On a brighter note, a provision to create the manufacturing research hubs garnered bipartisan support and was attached to a Senate budget proposal.

Manufacturing is picking up a bit and creating more jobs, but adding 1 million more by 2016 is unlikely. That would require 250,000 new factory jobs per year, nearly double the current pace.

Several trends are working in favor of American manufacturing. Labor costs are rising in China. U.S. corporations are increasingly worried that overseas supply chains are vulnerable to natural disasters and other disruptions. And an oil and gas drilling boom has made energy much cheaper in the U.S., reducing manufacturing costs. Factories have added more than 500,000 jobs in the past three years.

But factories still only employ about 9 percent of the U.S. workforce. That's down from 14 percent in 1997.

And more manufacturing output doesn't create many more jobs, because automation has made many factories highly productive. The Congressional Research Service estimated in a July report that manufacturing output increased 19 percent in the three years after the recession ended. But employment rose only 4 percent.

http://www.dailyfinance.com/2013/02/26/sequester-how-it-will-affect-you/

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How Financial Planners go Grocery Shopping

Learn to shop smart and save.

View Course »

Getting out of debt

Everyone hates debt. Get out of it.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

2 Comments

Filter by:
janeswizzle

My favorite quote from our community organizer;

" I will not rest until every American has a job that needs a job."
mike.oxard hits the nail squarely, this man pulled of the greatest hoax on comatose voters not once, but twice. I can't believe that there are that many brain dead people that live in the U.S.A. .

April 16 2013 at 11:18 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to janeswizzle's comment
janeswizzle

OFF , NOT OF

April 16 2013 at 11:19 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply