If you haven't noticed yet, natural gas prices have started to head higher. A combination of factors, including a surprisingly cold March, have led to resilient demand. As prices have inched up, two top Wall Street banks have seen enough momentum to raise their 2013 price target for natural gas. Morgan Stanley's price forecast was bumped up by 7% to $3.93 per million British thermal units, or MMBtu, while Goldman Sachs raised its forecast from $3.75 per MMBtu all the way to $4.40 per MMBtu.

That's good news for those companies in regions where natural gas production is actually growing. Overall since the end of 2011, North American dry shale gas production has risen by 9.95% to 27.2 billion cubic feet of production per day as of the beginning of this past February. This rise has been driven primarily by production growth at three big plays. Let's take a look.

Eagle Ford
While not known for natural gas, the Eagle Ford Shale has actually seen a 43.12% pop in natural gas production according to data from the Energy Information Administration, or EIA, over the past year. Most of this gas is associated with oil and liquids, as fewer companies are drilling in the dry gas window at the moment.


For example, Chesapeake Energy's core acreage is in the sweet spot of the oil window. Despite that, 19% of the company's fourth-quarter production was natural gas. As Chesapeake increases its overall production, natural gas production increases as a byproduct of its liquids-focused drilling. Further, as the nation's No. 2 gas producer, Chesapeake is one of the biggest beneficiaries of higher gas prices.

Marcellus
According to the EIA, natural gas production out of the Marcellus jumped 55.28% over the past year. Top producer, Range Resources , produced a total of 146 Bcf of natural gas last year. That production easily exceeded that of number two producer EQT's 103 Bcf of natural gas production last year.

These two companies hold one thing in common: Both are among the lowest-cost producers of natural gas in the country, which gives them a competitive advantage to make money when most of their competitors cannot. Investors in these low-cost producers have been served well as both have returned around 40% over the past year. 

Bakken
While the Bakken is known for its oil, natural gas production skyrocketed by 94.38% according to data from the EIA. Part of the reason more gas is being produced is because less of it is being flared -- instead, it's being put into pipelines. Most of this infrastructure simply didn't exist until recently and now that companies have a way to get gas to market, they're able to sell instead of flare.

The impact of this reduced flaring is clearly evident at Kodiak Oil & Gas . In 2011 the company produced 1,329 MMcf of gas, but flared 807 MMcf. That's 61% of the gas! Last year the company produced 6,613 MMcf of natural gas and while it flared 3,311 MMcf, down to 50% of what was produced. Meanwhile, the overall amount of gas that hit the market jumped a staggering 533%.

Kodiak isn't the only company growing its associated gas production. Over the past two years, Continental Resources has grown its overall production faster than its peers, so that it's now the top producer in the play. While its production is heavily weighted toward oil, which accounted for 72% of production, it's still growing natural gas production as a byproduct of its oil growth.

The Foolish bottom line
There's one main theme that runs throughout: Companies will produce more natural gas if it's profitable to do so. For some, that's being the low-cost producer giving them the ability to profit when others cannot. For the rest, natural gas production growth happens naturally because of its associated with more profitable oil and natural gas liquids. Given the economics of these regions, its not surprising to see this increase in natural gas production. 

As the nation's second-largest natural gas producer, Chesapeake Energy is a name to watch as gas prices head higher. Not only that but energy investors would be hard-pressed to find another company trading at a deeper discount than Chesapeake Energy. Its share price depreciated after negative news surfaced concerning the company's management and spiraling debt picture. While the debt issues still persist, giant steps have been taken to help mitigate the problems. To learn more about Chesapeake and its enormous potential, you're invited to check out The Motley Fool's brand-new premium report on the company. Simply click here now to access your copy.

The article 3 Regions Where Natural Gas Production Is Growing originally appeared on Fool.com.

Fool contributor Matt DiLallo has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Range Resources. The Motley Fool has the following options: Long Jan 2014 $20 Calls on Chesapeake Energy, Long Jan 2014 $30 Calls on Chesapeake Energy, and Short Jan 2014 $15 Puts on Chesapeake Energy. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Investing in Emerging Markets

Learn to invest in a globalized world.

View Course »

Reading a Stock Quote

Learn to read the ingredients of a stock.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum