An Android Killer?
Mar 27th 2013 11:00PM
Updated Mar 27th 2013 11:06PM
Since its introduction four years ago, Google's Android has taken the world by storm, rising to a global market share of 68.3% according to research firm IDC. In the developed world, Apple's iOS has been the benchmark Google is chasing, but in emerging markets, Android is almost unchallenged. The platform is free to developers and comes with a wide breadth of applications that have allowed the OS to spread. Apple has essentially stayed out of the emerging markets, and other competitors are just beginning to wake up to the importance of these markets.
Despite this global dominance, Android is not without some severe shortcomings that have left a real opening for competition. Spearheading one such effort is a partnership involving Samsung, Intel , Huawei, and a slew of other Asian players. You must love the irony that Tizen, the new OS, is largely the product of Samsung, one of the biggest drivers of Google's success and the largest Android provider by market share by a huge margin.
Samsung is set to release the first Tizen device near the end of the summer. The company has promised a premium smartphone that will be at least on par with the recently released Galaxy S4. If the new OS is well received, it has the potential to completely disrupt Android's emerging-market business, particularly in Asia, and potentially in Africa. Given the growth rates in these regions, the release of Tizen has to be the most important development in the smartphone arena since Android itself.
The political side of the smartphone wars
In January 2010, Google found itself in the midst of a philosophical battle with none other than the Chinese government. Google was forced to censor certain search results at google.cn that the Chinese government deemed unacceptable. In response to the impasse, Google began rerouting Chinese users to its Hong Kong site, thereby circumventing the need to obey Chinese laws. Also deeply tied to the situation was the government's desire to have "monitoring" access to Chinese users. This move was not well received, and the company was quickly forced to leave the country entirely.
While the connection between a political dispute on censorship and smartphone dominance may not be immediately apparent, remember that everything Google does is tied to search. Everything. What this means is that Android, and the Google apps that are native to it, are tied to a search engine that isn't welcome in China. Since Google's historic departure, the company's market share has been gobbled up by various players native to the region. Baidu , for example, which is known as the Google of China, has become the preferred browser of many users.
How this translates into smartphones is that in many cases, manufacturers selling devices in this part of the world must include user interfaces which that a primary purpose of working around much of Android's native functionality. If you're wondering why Samsung, Huawei, or others would still choose Android, keep in mind that it's an essentially open-source, free software supported by 700,000 apps and enjoying almost global acceptance. In simpler terms, Android represented the path of least resistance for companies that were eager to get to market and didn't necessarily possess the resources -- at least at the time -- to develop their own OS.
Problems solved by Tizen
Not only will Tizen alleviate the need to create complex workaround solutions for Android's native applications, but it will also unlock value for manufacturers and local service providers. Because Google is essentially shut out of these markets anyway, in one sense, the move won't cost the company money because it isn't making any. In addition, companies such as Baidu aren't able to create the native content that they would like to not only bolster their own business, but also create richer user experiences; Google may not be actually functioning on these devices, but it isn't about to allow others to muscle in to the core code. Lastly, because smartphone makers are stuck with Google, they can't negotiate mutually beneficial relationships with other providers that are more interested in these markets.
Does Google care?
The next logical question is that if Google isn't making money in these markets with Android, should it care? Unfortunately for Google, the answer is yes. Leaving aside the reality that the smartphone wars are largely about perception -- showing more market share has intrinsic value -- Tizen won't be limited to those markets in which Google is shut out. If the OS gains traction in Asia, certainly a critical market by any measure, it will have the potential to pose a threat on all fronts to Android.
The emerging markets remain the last frontier of explosive growth in smartphones. While growth in developed markets is not anemic, there are signs that it is leveling off. This makes emerging, untapped markets the single most important battleground for every aspect of the smartphone industry. Especially with Apple remaining on the sidelines, apparently preferring to remain a premium-only provider, a real threat in these markets should give Android investors pause. Ahead of the release, it's too early to know how disruptive Tizen will be, but it has the potential to be the single most important smartphone event of 2013.
When it comes to dominating markets, it doesn't get much better than Intel's position in the PC microprocessor arena. However, that market is maturing, and Intel finds itself in a precarious situation longer term if it doesn't find new avenues for growth. In this premium research report on Intel, our analyst runs through all of the key topics investors should understand about the chip giant. Click here now to learn more.
The article An Android Killer? originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Doug Ehrman has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends and owns shares of Apple, Baidu, Google, and Intel. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.