Is VMware a Value Play or a Trap?
Mar 18th 2013 9:45PM
Updated Mar 18th 2013 9:52PM
Shares of VMware were up were up 11% this past week, and investors have begun to wonder if the stock has bottomed. Though the company reported solid fourth-quarter earnings that topped Street estimates, management spooked analysts with a soft first-quarter and fiscal 2013 outlook, which sent the stock down tumbling 30%. However, management has been saying all of the right things lately, and it seems that the Street has bought in. I wouldn't get too excited just yet, though.
Jumping for what?
VMware, along with EMC , which owns 80% of the virtualization giant, recently held a "strategy day," during which, both companies spoke to analysts about (among other things) the future of the cloud. While VMware is still doing well in this space today, gone is the belief that VMware's growth will last forever.
However, management wanted to put an end to speculation that this company was being eaten alive by the likes of Citrix . To that end, VMWare gave some new growth targets that seemed more upbeat. But were they? It projected fiscal 2013 revenue growth to arrive in the range of 11.2% to 13.8% while also saying that this range can go higher to 15% to 20% by 2014 to 2016. Analysts rejoiced, but hold your horses.
First, these aren't exactly breathtaking numbers. The stock's valuation and the projected growth still don't jibe. For that matter, a case can be made that management actually lowered guidance. When VMware reported fourth-quarter earnings, management (then) called for a low end of 14% growth for fiscal 2013, which was (then) 3% less than what analysts were looking for. This was why the stock got hammered by 20% following the announcement.
It's odd that the stock would now react favorably to guidance that is lower by more than 3%. It seems the Street's love affair with VMware wants to continue at any cost. I suppose EMC's defense of VMware growth outlook helped. EMC's management said that VMware's revenue growth should continue to accelerate while also suggesting that cloud and flash trends are not disruptive to EMC's storage business. But was this enough to deserve such an upbeat reaction? Investors need to pause and understand that VMware still has some issues to address.
Is it a value or a trap?
Management had previously warned investors not to expect much growth until the second half of the year. If you want to make the case today that the stock has bottomed, I suppose it's worth a gamble. But you're also waging that the worst over. Besides, investors can't be comfortable with single-digit license growth, while Citrix, which has been stealing market share, recently posted earnings that included a 17% jump in product and license revenue.
This means that VMware's market leverage is also diminishing. Why, then, when comparing their price-to-earnings ratios, does VMware deserve such a premium to Citrix (48 vs. 39), especially when Citrix outperforms in gross margin and earnings per share? VMware's management believes it can remain a force. But is there enough virtualization demand to go around? That roughly 65% to 70% of VMware's addressable server market is already virtualized is a concern.
"Virtual growth" is a real challenge
While market dominance is a problem that every company wants, it also means that your business has saturated the market. Management has to now answer that all-important question: What's next? And I don't think VMware adequately did this -- not to the extent that it justifies the valuation. This is even though recent studies suggest that VMware can still grow its market to 80%. But will it be enough?
CEO Pat Gelsinger said that VMware will move toward selling a suite of products as opposed to just server virtualization, which includes storage, computer networks, and products that will need to be virtualized. That's all well and good, but aside from reshifting product and service groups, how will that make VMware any more formidable?
Besides, it's not as if existing products are uniformly better than what Citrix offers with XenDesktop, which, in most cases, costs 50% less than VMware's vSphere. Likewise, Microsoft's Hyper-V solution, which is essentially an extension to its System Center ecosystem, should not be overlooked as a threat down the road since it takes an "expansion" approach, which means that Microsoft does not have to reinvent environments that are already running Windows or its Microsoft's System Center.
VMware has some very important decisions to make as it is beginning to get squeezed. It must also address new markets in order to grow. In the meantime, investors shouldn't be fooled by Wall Street's reaction. This has all the makings of a trap.
It's been a frustrating path for Microsoft investors, who've watched the company fail to capitalize on the incredible growth in mobile over the past decade. However, with the release of its own tablet, along with the widely anticipated Windows 8 operating system, the company is looking to make a splash in this booming market. In this brand-new premium report on Microsoft, our analyst explains that while the opportunity is huge, the challenges are many. He's also providing regular updates as key events occur, so make sure to claim a copy of this report now by clicking here.
The article Is VMware a Value Play or a Trap? originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Richard Saintvilus has no position in any stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends VMware. The Motley Fool owns shares of EMC, Microsoft, and VMware. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.