Confirmed: Big Banks Are "Too Big to Jail"
Mar 7th 2013 10:15AM
Updated Mar 7th 2013 10:18AM
On the back of another Dow record yesterday, stocks opened slightly higher this morning, with the S&P 500 and the narrower, price-weighted Dow Jones Industrial Average up 0.11% and 0.32%, respectively, as of 10:10 a.m. EST.
You can't touch this
In an astonishing admission, the nation's top law-enforcement officer, U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder told members of Congress that size has a dissuasive effect when it comes to prosecuting large financial institutions due to concerns about the potential ripple effect on the economy, stating: "That is a function of the fact that some of these institutions have become too large. ... [The size of large banks] has an inhibiting influence -- impact on our ability to bring resolutions that I think would be more appropriate."
It appears that "too big to fail" has brought about the equally undesirable "too big to jail." Mind you, that didn't stop federal prosecutors in New York from bringing a billion-dollar civil suit against Bank of America last October for allegedly defrauding government mortgage agencies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac through activities in its Countrywide Financial unit.
The consequences of "too big to fail" are apparent outside the U.S., too. Yesterday, in testimony to the Commission on Banking Standards, the outgoing governor of the Bank of England, Sir Mervyn King, recommended that nationalized lender Royal Bank of Scotland be broken up, reasoning that "at present RBS is a portfolio of different activities that doesn't sit well enough together to make the market want to bid for it."
Last month, when appearing before Congress for his semiannual monetary policy report, Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke clashed with freshman Senator Elizabeth Warren on this topic, suggesting that the implicit subsidy big banks receive through lower funding costs is a case of the market getting it wrong and that these institutions would be allowed to fail. Either Mr. Bernanke is bluffing or he is in denial. Mr. Holder's admission has provided a new political impetus for the breakup of big banks -- this is no bad thing.
Bank of America's stock doubled in 2012. Is there more yet to come? With significant challenges still ahead, it's critical to have a solid understanding of this megabank before adding it to your portfolio. In The Motley Fool's premium research report on B of A, analyst Anand Chokkavelu, CFA, and Financials bureau chief Matt Koppenheffer lift the veil on the bank's operations, including three reasons to buy and three reasons to sell. Click here now to claim your copy.
The article Confirmed: Big Banks Are "Too Big to Jail" originally appeared on Fool.com.Fool contributor Alex Dumortier, CFA has no position in any stocks mentioned; you can follow him on LinkedIn. The Motley Fool owns shares of Bank of America. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools may not all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
Copyright © 1995 - 2013 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.