CFPB Unveils New Federal Rules to Curb Risky Mortgages

MortgagesBy DANIEL WAGNER

WASHINGTON -- Federal regulators for the first time are laying out rules aimed at ensuring that mortgage borrowers can afford to repay the loans they take out.

The rules being unveiled Thursday by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau impose a range of obligations and restrictions on lenders, including bans on the risky "interest-only" and "no documentation" loans that helped inflate the housing bubble.

Lenders will be required to verify and inspect borrowers' financial records. The rules discourage them from saddling borrowers with total debt payments totaling more than 43 percent of the person's annual income. That includes existing debts like credit cards and student loans.

CFPB Director Richard Cordray, in remarks prepared for an event Thursday, called the rules "the true essence of 'responsible lending.'"

The rules, which take effect next year, aim to "make sure that people who work hard to buy their own home can be assured of not only greater consumer protections but also reasonable access to credit," he said.

Cordray noted that in years leading up to the 2008 financial crisis, consumers could easily obtain mortgages that they could not afford to repay. In contrast, in subsequent years banks tightened lending so much that few could qualify for a home loan.

The new rules seek out a middle ground by protecting consumers from bad loans while giving banks the legal assurances they need to increase lending, he said.

The mortgage-lending overhaul is a priority for the agency, which was created under the 2010 financial law known as the Dodd-Frank Act. The agency is charged with reducing the risk of a credit bubble by helping to ensure that borrowers are better informed and loans are more likely to be repaid.

The agency is charged with writing and enforcing rules that flesh out the law passed by Congress. Some provisions are required under the law, but the agency had broad discretion in designing many of the new requirements.

The rules limit features like teaser rates that adjust upwards and large "balloon payments" that must be made at the end of the loan period.

They include several exceptions aimed at ensuring a smooth phase-in and protecting access to credit for underserved groups. For example, the strict cap on how much debt consumers may take on will not apply immediately. Loans that meet separate federal standards also would be permitted for the first seven years.

Balloon payments would be allowed for certain small lenders that operate in rural or underserved communities, because other loans may not be available in those areas.

The bureau also proposed amendments that would exempt from the rules some loans made by community banks, credit unions and nonprofit lenders that work with low- and moderate-income consumers.

___

Daniel Wagner can be reached at www.twitter.com/wagnerreports.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

How to Avoid Financial Scams

Avoid getting duped by financial scams.

View Course »

Timing Your Spending

How to pay less by changing when you purchase.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

10 Comments

Filter by:
anny.frank

Great, Really it is a best mortgage blog. Thanks for share this.


http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-loan/

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-rates/

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/reverse-mortgage-calculator/

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/washington-dc-reverse-mortgage/

http://www.reversemortgagelendersdirect.com/who-qualifies-for-a-reverse-mortgage/

July 11 2013 at 4:54 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gmydogbud

Everything Old, Is New Again! We had to save for years, so that the bank would give us a loan. We had to show that we had jobs and had been there for X number of years. Then the Highly Educated, Ivy League Types, decided that was no longer necessary and forced banks into giving loans to people, they knew could not pay them back. That was the modern day "Fairness Doctrine". Their bright ideas caused the housing bouble! Guess they were not so smart after all!!

January 13 2013 at 4:16 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
rgmac12

Amaxing we have to hold anyones hand and guide them thru basic life transactions. If you dont know if you can afford a hime .. you probably can't. You can GOOGle it and do the basic math

Of course if you dont know how to control spending or budget your money .....you wont have the money to pay your mortgage.

Oh .. comments above also apply to the free spending liberals in office

January 11 2013 at 4:06 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
jhrooney

It use to be 28% and 36% of salary and total debts. Your right about the Bozo's in Wa though. As usual the author mentions the Dodd Frank act. They never mention these two Dancing Bozo's had oversight on Fannie and Freddie and Frank assure everyone that all was fine with those agenices two months before the bottom fell out.
Now Frank wants to be appointed to the Senate. If the govenor appoints him then Ma is dumber than I thought.

January 10 2013 at 11:51 AM Report abuse -2 rate up rate down Reply
browse62

So the rules don't apply to loan aplications submitted by low and moderate income applicants? Then, what's the point of having the rules? Don't those bozos in Washington understand that lots of the mortgage loans that went bad were made to low and moderate income applicants, probably the majority of the loans? I think those bozos in Washington are living in an Alice In Wonderland world, totally separate from reality!

January 10 2013 at 10:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to browse62's comment
garryangel

My sentiments exactly, I was just getting ready to write your response. It popped out of the article like a sharp stick in the eye. Just went through a refi on an investment property and had to document everything but the kitchen sink.

January 10 2013 at 11:35 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to garryangel's comment
vlady1000

Yep exactly what I saw too!!! I too refied a couple investment properties and biught another one recently. No problems, but had to submit over 200 pages of info and answer the dumbest questions I have heard in a long time.

January 10 2013 at 12:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down
luckycur

Why would they set 43% of income as a limit for a mortgage, who can live on 57% of income to pay their remaining bills. Typical of our Congress & Senate, folks who cannot balanace our Federal budget.

January 10 2013 at 10:53 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
cdsj

So our government is telling bankers how to lend and borrowers how much they can afford to borrrow. Can they make the same rules applicable to our Federal Government including the loan to value and debt to income ratios a mortgage lender requires? If they did, there would be a declining federal budget deficit and spending would be less than income with a specific paid in full date of the indebtedness.

January 10 2013 at 9:25 AM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to cdsj's comment
pfjw

Well - consider the typical amount borrowed is roughly between 2 and 3 times the gross income.

US Gross Debt is something around-just-under 15 trillion.

Gross Federal Tax income is 2.5 trillion. That comes to about 6:1. In other words, not sustainable without lots of ink, paper and the presses to use it on. Nor is spending less an option. Far too many sacred cows on the line.

January 10 2013 at 9:56 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply