Is the Lap Dance a Tax-Exempt Art Form?

By MICHAEL VIRTANEN, Associated Press

ALBANY, N.Y. -- They may never be confused with "Swan Lake," but an upstate New York strip club says its nude lap dances are every bit as much an art form and should be exempt from state taxes.

So far, the state tax department and an appeals court disagree and want the Nite Moves club in Albany to pay up $124,000 it says it owes taxes.

New York's highest court gets a shot at the arguments Wednesday when the two sides face off at the Court of Appeals.

Tax officials say sales taxes were paid on the club's non-alcoholic drinks, but are also owed on admission and so-called "couch sales," where patrons pay for private or lap dances.

Nite Moves claims the dances are exempt under state tax law as "live dramatic or musical arts performances." The exemption also applies to theater or ballet. The club is relying on testimony from a cultural anthropologist who has studied exotic dance and visited Nite Moves.

W. Andrew McCullough, an attorney for Nite Moves, said the impact of the eventual court ruling probably won't be widespread because most establishments featuring exotic dancers sell alcohol where other tax rules apply.

An administrative law judge previously agreed with Nite Moves, saying that "the fact that the dancers remove all or part of their costume ... simply does not render such dance routines as something less than choreographed performances."

But the state Tax Appeals Tribunal said the club didn't present sufficient proof that it qualifies for the exemption, and a mid-level court upheld the tribunal ruling last year.

"In our view, there can be no serious question that - at a bare minimum - petitioner failed to meet its burden of establishing that the private dances offered at its club were choreographed performances," the Appellate Division court ruled. The four justices also found "no merit" to the club's constitutional claims.

The appellate court also noted that the club dancers are not required to have any formal dance training and that the anthropologist didn't see any of the dances done in private rooms.

Cary Zeitner, a spokesman for the state Department of Taxation and Finance, said the agency is not aware of any other cases in state court similar to the Nite Moves case.

The court typically takes about a month to issue a decision.

• <p> <span class="byline">By <span class="author vcard"> <span class="fn"> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/writers/cnnmoney/"> CNNMoney </a> </span> </span></span></p> <p> Call it extreme communication. One taxpayer was so distrustful of technology that he wouldn't use a telephone or computer.</p> <p> That posed a problem when it came to communicating with his business partner, who lived across town in Phoenix. So he came up with a plan: carrier pigeons.</p> <p> The two now send messages to each other via the birds. And the technophobe thought it made sense to write off the pigeons, as well as their care, food and housing, as a business expense.</p> <p> Shauna Wekherlien, the CPA at Tax Goddess Business Services who prepared his return, said she asked him a lot of questions (like whether he has ever owned a computer) to establish whether he had ever used technology to communicate with people in the past.</p> <p> He said he hadn't, so she determined that the deduction was fair game, given that it was the only way he could reach his business partner.</p>
• <p> A woman from Arizona actually tried to deduct the cost of her own baby.</p> <p> Because she used photos of her child in marketing materials for her curtain and blinds business, she thought the money she spent on her baby's food, clothing, nanny, diapers and baby powder -- a total of about $26,000 -- should all count as deductible business expenses.</p> <p> CPA Wekherlien, at Tax Goddess Business Services, said she was able to write off the cost of hiring the photographer who took the photos of the baby, as well as the baby's stroller and the onesies that carried the company logo (which pictured the baby), but the rest of the expenses weren't allowed.</p>
• <p> Deducting the cost of your own hip replacement is one thing, but it's another to write off your dog's surgery.</p> <p> When one client dropped off her tax information to Bruce McFarland, a tax preparer at L&amp;R Tax Preparation in Missouri, he noticed that she had written off an unusually high amount of medical expenses, including $8,000 for a &quot;family dependent&quot; -- even though she had no spouse or children.</p> <p> That &quot;family dependent&quot; turned out to be her dog. She considered the pooch such an important part of the family that she thought it would be legitimate to write off its medical expenses.</p> <p> But because the animal wasn't a medical necessity for the taxpayer, McFarland couldn't let her deduct the cost of its surgery or any of its other expenses.</p>
• <p> Watching your wife pole dance may be a good way to unwind from a long day of work, but it hardly counts as a business-related activity in the eyes of the IRS.</p> <p> Nevertheless, one man tried to write off the cost of his wife's pole dancing lessons as a business expense under &quot;meals and entertainment.&quot; The man explained that watching her dance was his post-work relaxation and made him better at his job.</p> <p> Wekherlien, at Tax Goddess Business Services, said she had to remove the deduction from his return, informing the man that the $800 he spent on pole dancing classes would be swiftly denied by the IRS.</p>
• <p> With the right prescription, even bottled water can be deductible. In fact, one very wealthy client managed to deduct $1,095 worth of Evian as a medical expense on her taxes.</p> <p> Somehow, the woman had convinced her doctor to give her a prescription for three bottles of Evian water every day, said John Lieberman, a CPA at Perelson Weiner LLP.</p> <p> Lieberman didn't ask her what the medical condition was that required her to drink only Evian water, but he said the deduction was permissible since it was actually prescribed by a doctor and she still had the prescription note for her files.</p>
• <p> A real estate agent who was &quot;a little bit big on the bottom&quot;, according to her tax preparer, bought a number of pairs of the slimming underwear called Spanx because she thought looking smaller would help her sell more houses.</p> <p> The tax preparer, who asked to remain anonymous, said the woman also argued that wearing Spanx helped her to sit down more comfortably with clients. But the preparer had to axe the deduction since there was no hard proof it impacted her business or income, making it hard to qualify the undergarment as a business expense.</p>
• <p> <style type="text/css"> .hpgText .interiorPromo {display:none;} </style> </p> <p> More Galleries on Daily Finance</p> <p> </p> <p> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/04/05/celebrity-tax-blunders-what-you-can-learn-from-how-fame-mishand/">Celebrity Tax Blunders: What You Can Learn from How Fame Mishandles Fortune</a></p> <p> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2011/05/03/lottery-states-biggest-jackpots/">The 10 States That Pay Out the Biggest Lottery Jackpots</a></p> <p> <a href="http://www.dailyfinance.com/2012/03/28/7-indie-brands-owned-by-major-companies/">Indie That Isn't: You'll Be Shocked by Who's Behind These 7 Brands</a></p> <p"></p"> <p> <p"></p"></p>
• <p> Certain drugs qualify as legitimate medical deductions. But when they're recreational drugs, like say cocaine or ecstasy, the expenses are a little harder to slip by the IRS.</p> <p> Dave Spaulding, an enrolled agent at Janover LLC, a financial planning firm, said clients who were in a rock band actually tried to deduct an item labeled &quot;drugs&quot; as &quot;travel &amp; entertainment&quot; expenses.</p> <p> The total cost of the &quot;drugs&quot; was in the high five-figures, and the band didn't even try to disguise them as prescription or medical drugs.</p> <p> &quot;The band's bookkeeper had concluded that the cost of recreational drugs was necessary and ordinary,&quot; he said. &quot;Apart from admitting to possession of illegal drugs, the IRS would strongly differ with their tax position.&quot;</p> <p> Needless to say, Spaulding's firm removed the deduction from the band's tax form.</p> <p> Read More at CNNMoney</p> <p style="margin-left:.5in;"> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/quizzes/2011/pf/taxes/wacky_deductions/">Tax quiz: Are you smarter than the IRS?</a></p> <p style="margin-left:.5in;"> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/28/pf/taxes/tax_prep.moneymag/index.htm">5 tricky tax challenges</a></p> <p style="margin-left:.5in;"> <a href="http://money.cnn.com/2012/02/16/pf/taxes/tax_scams/index.htm">Beware these 'dirty dozen' tax scams</a></p>