- Days left
Olympic Gold Medal
Team USA's biggest winner of the London Olympic Games may be the IRS.

Our Olympic medalists will rake in handsome rewards for representing their country, but they will also have to give a chunk back to Uncle Sam in taxes, notes the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation.

Under U.S. tax law, they must include the value of their Olympic medals and prizes in their taxable income. The precious metal in the medals is worth about $675 for gold, $385 for silver and under $5 for bronze. But medalists take in handsome cash prizes, too: $25,000 for gold, $15,000 for silver and $10,000 for bronze.

Assuming they're paying the top U.S. tax rate of 35%, that means Olympians would have to shell out $8,750 for winning gold, $5,250 for silver and $3,500 for bronze.

The British government has waived its right to tax Olympians' winnings, and the ATRF -- research arm for Grover Norquist's ultra-conservative anti-tax group, Americans for Tax Reform -- is publicly taking issue with the idea that U.S. citizens earning money abroad should have to pay U.S. taxes on it, according to Ryan Ellis, tax policy director for the ATR. U.S. policy differs from that of the majority of the world's countries, which don't tax their citizens for income earned abroad.

"The larger point is that the IRS should only seek income earned within the U.S. just like other countries," Ellis said. "We don't have the same system the rest of the world does and we should."

Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) introduced a bill earlier this week that would exempt Olympians from taxes on their winnings. Gov. Mitt Romney, the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, voiced support for this measure.

But so far, there hasn't been enough of a lobbying effort to gain traction against what the ATR calls "double taxation," primarily because the number of U.S. citizens working and earning money abroad hasn't been large enough.

"How many people have overseas income?" Ellis asked. "It's a very small number, and in politics, the only thing to move anything is votes and money: There's not enough votes in this."

With increasing globalization and opportunities to earn abroad, that extra tax bite could actually become a disincentive to people returning to the U.S. to contribute to the domestic economy, Ellis suggests.

Already, Ellis says, many corporations with subsidiaries in foreign countries shy away from bringing their profits back to the U.S. because to do so would mean paying U.S. taxes on them.

"You don't have to pay the second tax to the IRS until you actually bring the money back here," Ellis said. "If you leave it overseas, the tax is deferred indefinitely. Our current system incentivizes people to stay overseas."


But Corporations Aren't People

A closer look at this argument reveals a fairly obvious apples-to-oranges comparison being made by Ellis and the ATR: There's a big difference between how individuals and corporations are treated when it comes to taxable foreign income, as the White House's National Economic Council makes clear.

An American citizen who earns up to $95,100 overseas pays only the foreign taxes on that income. If he earns more than that, he pays U.S. taxes only on the amount earned above that threshold. More importantly, the taxpayer gets a U.S. tax credit for taxes paid to other governments. The result should be that, at worst, someone earning money overseas should pay no more overall than if all money had been earned here, and all the taxes in question were paid to the IRS. (And, thanks to loopholes in the system, it often works out that those workers pay less, the NEC notes.)

Corporations, by contrast ... well, that's more complicated, but the NEC website concisely explains the issue:

Companies Can Defer Paying Taxes on Overseas Profits Until Later, While Taking Tax Deductions on Their Foreign Expenses Now: Currently, a company that invests in America has to pay immediate U.S. taxes on its profits from that investment. But if the company instead invests and creates jobs overseas through a foreign subsidiary, it does not have to pay U.S. taxes on its overseas profits until those profits are brought back to the United States, if they ever are. Yet even though companies do not have to pay U.S. taxes on their overseas profits today, they still get to take deductions today on their U.S. tax returns for all of the expenses that support their overseas investment.


And it's questionable as to whether upholding a "territorial taxation" system -- in which taxes are paid only to the jurisdictions where the money is earned -- would benefit the U.S. economy, the NEC says.

"Pure territorial taxation is a $200 billion tax incentive for increasing jobs overseas, not for creating jobs in America," Principal Deputy NEC Director Jason Furman told DailyFinance.

Right now, an American multinational corporation will pay 12% in taxes in China, for example, and nothing to the U.S. If after five years, it decides to bring those profits back to the U.S., it will pay 23% on the earnings -- equaling the top U.S. tax rate of 35%, and never exceeding it.

"The notion that there's a double tax is completely absurd," Furman said.

And in reality, the NEC says, many U.S. corporations opt for added taxing flexibility by having a subsidiary in the Cayman Islands who will own the intellectual property and allow the company to pay only 2% in taxes. Some corporations will never bring that money back to the U.S.

President Obama has proposed an international minimum tax for foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations -- one they'd have to pay immediately, without a deferral. In theory, that would ensure that if a company had a choice between opening a factory in Ohio or China, there wouldn't be a huge tax advantage for choosing China.

In turn, the NEC says, the money raised from the minimum tax would allow the IRS to cut the corporate tax rate to 28% overall, which would help U.S. based companies.

Beyond the Olympic games, taxation on foreign income could be a hot-button issue in another contest -- the approaching presidential election.

Romney has discussed his approval of a strictly "territorial taxation" system. The NEC argues his plan would result in 800,000 jobs created ... overseas.

The ATR wants to extrapolate the issue of how Olympians are taxed, and apply it to the larger question of how the foreign subsidiaries of U.S. corporations are. Even for U.S. athlete Marquise Goodwin, that's a long jump.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Timing Your Spending

How to pay less by changing when you purchase.

View Course »

Basics Of The Stock Market

Stock Market 101 - everything you need to know but were afraid to ask!

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Video: Who Qualifies for an Affordable Care Act Exemption (Obamacare)?

The Affordable Care Act requires all Americans to have health insurance or pay a tax penalty. But, who qualifies for an Affordable Care Act exemption? Find out more about who qualifies for an exemption from the Affordable Care Act tax penalty, how to claim an exemption on your tax return and how the Affordable Care Act may affect your taxes with this video from TurboTax.

Video: How to Claim the Affordable Care Act Premium Tax Credit (Obamacare)

The Affordable Care Act Premium Tax Credit is a new refundable tax credit that can lower your monthly health insurance premiums. If you qualify for the tax credit, you can claim the Premium Tax Credit throughout the year to lower your monthly health insurance premiums, or claim the credit with your tax return to either lower your overall tax bill or increase your tax refund.

Deducting Summer Camps and Daycare with the Child and Dependent Care Credit

If you paid a daycare center, babysitter, summer camp, or other care provider to care for a qualifying child under age 13 or a disabled dependent of any age, you may qualify for a tax credit of up to up to 35 percent of qualifying expenses of $3,000 for one child or dependent, or up to $6,000 for two or more children or dependents.

What Is Schedule H: Household Employment Taxes

If you hire people to do work around your house on a regular basis, they might be considered household employees. Being an employer comes with some responsibilities for paying and reporting employment taxes, which includes filing a Schedule H with your federal tax return. But even if you have household employees, filing Schedule H is required only if the total wages you pay them is more than certain threshold amounts specified by federal tax law.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

329 Comments

Filter by:
joecyp

Many of the athletes competing have turned professional. Their earnings should be taxed just as any other earnings. They can also deduct their expenses. The non-professional winners, especially the young ones who are students, may not even have any other earnings and their winners' checks are taxed at the minimum 10% tax rate, not the 35% rate widely publicized in the blownup story.

August 07 2012 at 8:00 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
bilhee

While I feel that taxing athletes for medals won is ridiculous, taxing prize money won by professionals is fair game. However, a good accountant should find that their personal training expenses far outweighed either prize money or the value of the medals and everyone should have loss carry forwards for however many years they are eligible. In addition, it is doubtful that the non-professional theletes ie Missy Franklin will hit the 35% tax bracket..Still the concept of taxing athletes for the value of the medal won is just asinine. Let Mitt Romney pay them, since apparently his accountants got him tax breaks during the last 12 years lowering his personal tax rate to misiscule

August 07 2012 at 7:57 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
lfriscofog

Its not what they take.Its there waste of money thats a problem no matter how much they take its never enough,just like an exwife.

August 07 2012 at 12:43 AM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
mrshye1

Mitt is looking out for his best interests not for Americans. To be honest, it would be very easy for congress to say, 'we do not tax Medals or the cash prize won in the olympics" to the tax code. They put in the special favor in the code now for Mitt and his 1% buddies so only a few pay 15%. End of conversation. These people are not like professional atheletes. They are giving up lots of things for doing this for themselves and our country. Tax any other profits, but not the medals or the cash prize won. Mitt is not happy paying his 15% and wants it lower or he won't bring his fortune back to this country. Who could vote for this clown?
Bring common sense back to this country please.

August 06 2012 at 10:58 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
Mike

It would be nice for them to waive the taxes for the true amateurs, but income is income. I go back and forth on this. Do you not tax Phelps, or Lebron who make millions? Or do you tax the shot putter who got the bronze after he sacrificed and trained for 4 years to get just get some recognition and a little glory. It is a tough call.

August 06 2012 at 8:22 PM Report abuse +3 rate up rate down Reply
edwalters6

Tax what they make doing the promos and the like but don't tax their medals !!

August 06 2012 at 7:25 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
infinity6000

- its not un-usual for us to "spit on" and (slap on the face), those that try to help, -or make this COUNTRY PROUD..-(what else is NEW)?- - -

August 06 2012 at 7:14 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Velocity105

Of course there hasn't been substantial lobbying. You think the politicians want to lose part of their gravy train? It isn't enough that they VOTE THEMSELVES cost-of-living increases every year that far exceed what many Americans make in total income. It isn't enough that they threaten foreign banks to turn over investor's names and account balances. It isn't enough that they tax you when you put your parents in the ground. Waste of time if your parents were millionaires, the majority of the inheiritance is going to the government. California proposed a "Road Tax" recently to tax motorists for the miles they put on their cars. Then after they soak us for everything we make, they overspend themselves virtually into "federal bankruptcy." I'd like to see more articles by authors/writers/columnists declaring war on the IRS until someone (not the politicians of course) does something about this oppressive tax system.

August 06 2012 at 6:54 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
jpflrf

Another 4 years of oblamea and you won't have to pay taxes. The government will take all of your money and give you back what they think you need. Half the country already lives off your earnings.

August 06 2012 at 4:33 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply
rjjarch2001

Unless the recipient has earned almost $400,000 in the tax year, the amount stated in the article is false. Most athletes earning the $25,000 stipend plus almost $900 worth of medal will pay less than $2000. Look it up, as the author of this article should have.

August 06 2012 at 4:32 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply