Barnes & Noble Turns the Page on an Ugly Shareholder Lawsuit

Barnes & NobleA thorny corporate governance issue at Barnes & Noble (BKS) is finally going away.

A shareholder-initiated lawsuit has been settled as Leonard Riggio -- the leading bookseller's founder and chairman -- agreed to give up $29 million from the sale of his college bookstore business back to the company three years ago.

Investors scoffed at the $514 million deal at the time. Snapping up a chain watching over hundreds of college bookstores seemed like a step back as campuses were starting to flock to digital textbooks. The shift to digital was validated by Barnes & Noble itself when it introduced the Nook e-reader a year later.

Companies make bad decisions all the time, but this one was seen by many as a conflict of interest given Riggio's ownership stakes in both companies.

Throwing the Book at Booksellers

It will be Barnes & Noble itself -- and not its shareholders directly -- that stands to benefit from the decision of this derivative action lawsuit.

It's a welcome break for a company that's been posting steep losses lately outside of its seasonally potent holiday quarter.
The bookseller is expected to post a chunky deficit of 93 cents a share when it reports next week. It's a big shortfall, but it happens to be in line with the losses that Barnes & Noble has posted in its fiscal first quarter in the two previous years.

Barnes & Noble is willing to take a near-term hit on its Nook e-reader to make sure that it remains relevant in a world in which media consumption is quickly migrating toward digital delivery. It saw its nearest rival, Borders, liquidate last summer, and the retailer doesn't want to be next.

A New Chapter

Barnes & Noble would love to be selling its Nook at profitable price points, but that's not possible with (AMZN) willing to sell its Kindle e-readers and Kindle Fire tablets at a loss. It's a cutthroat niche, and there's no room for generous markups.

Both companies feel that the money they can make on digital downloads of books and magazines in the long run will be worth the losses on the hardware.

The future will have to bear that strategy out. For now, Barnes & Noble has settled its way out of an embarrassing predicament. It's now easier to focus on the challenges of tomorrow.

Longtime Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz does not own shares in any of the stocks in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of and writing puts on Barnes & Noble.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Finding Stock Ideas

Learn to do your research and find investments.

View Course »

Introduction to ETFs

The basics of Exchange Traded Funds and why ETFs are hot.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum


Filter by:

I want Barnes & Nobles to stay the course. Although I enjoy much of the digital world, nothing but Nothing can replace my library, my books!!! The electrodigital hype is projected ad nauseum, and the very young and not so young are following it into the abyss - sinking practically every dime they get into the latest gizmo. It's past incredible how simplicity is not even taught, known - much less recognized. It appears that an entire generation is lost to the stuff - so distracted by the latest hand-held thingie that they're walking into lamp posts, stepping into the path of moving vehicles, even falling over cliffs. If that's not horror enough, consider the braindead who are TWD - Typing While Driving!!!!!!!

June 15 2012 at 1:12 AM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply

Personally, B&N, Amazon, and everyone else in the market can keep their Nooks, Kindles, or whatever they want to name their e-readers to themselves. I prefer my books and magazines printed on paper, where I don't have to worry about a battery needing to recharged/replaced (except in a portable booklight I use maybe five or six times a year) or my 'user rights' or whatever you want to call them expiring on me in a year or whatever.

June 14 2012 at 9:00 PM Report abuse +2 rate up rate down Reply