80 Is the New 65: How High Should We Boost Retirement Age?
Jun 12th 2012 2:50PM
Updated Jun 13th 2012 10:27AM
Imagine what life would be like if we tacked 15 years onto the official retirement age -- it's not a particularly far-fetched scenario.
Life expectancies soared over the past century, thanks to advances in medical technology. Today the average 55-year-old will live to 82. In the 1930s, most were lucky to make it to 60.
It's this reality that has AIG CEO Robert Benmosche declaring that in Europe, "retirement ages will have to move to 70 [or even] 80 years old," especially in light of the continent's epic debt crisis.
And it's a suggestion the United States will have to consider as well.
The Dilemma: Death or Taxes
The positive news, of course, is that we're living longer. We get to enjoy far longer lives than our ancestors, spending more years with our children, grandchildren -- even great-grandchildren.
The problem is that we're still thinking about retirement like these ancestors did.
For starters, Social Security is an antiquated system. When it was created in 1937, most citizens didn't live past 60. Social Security was set up so that you'd begin receiving benefits at 65 when -- if, really -- you had outlived the normal lifespan.
If the same formula was being used today, you wouldn't be eligible to receive Social Security until you turned 89.
Yet now the same system tries to support folks who retire in their 60s and live into their 80s or beyond. The number of eligible beneficiaries has skyrocketed, and their payouts now span decades.
It simply can't work -- unless taxes are raised or retirement is pushed further out.
Viva la Taxes!
In a bold move, France's new president recently lowered the retirement age to 60. However, France's government concedes that this decision "will cost the state billions of euros a year," paid for by "higher worker and employer contributions."
In other words, the French will pay higher taxes in exchange for shorter careers.
Europe's dilemma will be ours in the U.S. within the next decade. With the way our Social Security system is currently structured, the nation faces a looming retirement crisis that we ordinary citizens cannot resolve. Sure, there are ways you can boost your own Social Security payout. But as a whole, Social Security and the money you will receive from it is something our politicians will have to sort out for us.
In practical terms, we have to decide whether to entrust a greater share of our income to the government during our careers (hoping to get part of it back when we retire) or enjoy more of that income while we work (using the excess to spend and save for retirement on our own).
In other words: Would you prefer to retire at a later age and pay fewer taxes during your lifetime, or retire earlier and pay even more taxes than you already do?
A Perspective Shift That Can Change Everything
The retirement age issue is not going away. But that does not mean the Social Security conundrum needs to be the single driving force that defines your future, either.
It is within our ability to realistically plan for a life into our 80s, 90s, or 100s. Think of how you'd like to spend those years. Where you'd like to live. What you'd like to learn. New hobbies you'll pick up.
Yet research shows that those people who do think about how they'd like to spend these later decades -- whether traveling the world, spoiling their grandkids, or learning a new skill or language -- "are more likely to save."
This means they're the ones who have the financial means to actually enjoy retirement.
This seemingly small psychological trick will not only get you to save more -- on your own terms -- but it will also get you to make smarter decisions about your health now, which should simultaneously lower your living expenses when you do retire.
Two birds, one stone. And the stone's already in your hand.
This article was written by Motley Fool analyst Adam J. Wiederman. Click here to read Adam's free report on the best ways to ensure and plan for a wealthy retirement.