gross domestic productThe federal government is reporting that gross domestic product, or GDP, grew at a 2.2% rate in the first three months of 2012. Following the announcement of the actual number, the next thing you probably heard or read is how disappointed everyone is.

Here's a primer on exactly what the GDP growth rate is, why the world stops when the number is announced, and why 2.2% is nothing to be disappointed about.

The Invention of GDP


Economists "invented" GDP in 1934, and it became the primary tool for measuring the country's economy in 1944. The idea is to try to get to a single, pure number that can be compared against the previous number to calculate the GDP growth rate.

GDP itself is a relatively straightforward calculation: Put simply, it's the total market value -- expressed in dollars -- of all the goods and services produced in the United States. Income and imports from U.S. companies and U.S. citizens not in the country aren't counted. Any effects of domestic inflation are also factored out.

This is the number that's widely reported and debated. GDP is calculated by the Bureau of Economic Analysis, part of the Department of Commerce, and is looked at every three months.



Post-Holiday Blues


So the 2.2% number currently dominating the headlines is the GDP growth rate for the first quarter of 2012. It measures the change in GDP from the last quarter of 2011 to the first quarter of 2012. The number is telling you that the U.S. economy has grown at an annualized 2.2% rate in that period of time.

The general feeling of disappointment in the air is happening because the growth rate has fallen from the last reported growth rate, which was 3.0%. There are several possible reasons for this decline:
  1. The initial quarter of any year can be a little "soft," as economists put it, simply because it's the first quarter after the year-end holiday season, when consumers typically spend the most and, hence, manufacturers and service providers typically produce the most. So even in the best of times, first-quarter GDP growth can be down a bit from the fourth quarter of the year previous.
  2. A second factor has to do with accuracy. The GDP growth number typically gets at least one, if not two, revisions. Even almost one month after the official end of the first quarter (March 31), the GDP number the federal government is using to compare against the last GDP to come up with today's reported growth rate isn't necessarily accurate. Important numbers have yet to come. As such, this 2.2% figure will almost certainly be revised. Last quarter, that revision was upward.
Putting Monday's Number in Context

Even if the number were never revised, 2.2% in and of itself isn't all that bad.

The U.S. saw 4.8% GDP growth in March 2006, but that was in the middle of the housing bubble -- an unsustainable lending and spending spree that led directly to the financial implosion of 2008. The country also saw 5.6% GDP growth in the fourth quarter of 2009, but there was a massive government stimulus program in motion at the time. That has long since run out, along with its stimulating effects.


Put in context, GDP growth in the upper 2% to the 3% range, maybe up to 4%, is the norm for our economy in healthy times anyway. And certainly, compared with what we've experienced since the start of the financial meltdown, 2.2% is quite encouraging. At the height of the crisis, during 2008 and 2009, the economy contracted for four straight quarters, meaning there was GDP shrinkage, not growth. It was the worst recession since the Great Depression of the 1930s.

So America's GDP growth rate is a benchmark, which we use to try to get an overall idea of how our economy is doing. It's the big picture. It helps businesses, governments, and consumers plan. Hence, the number is always big news.

For now, consider that 2.2% growth rate in the context of the past few years, wait to see in which direction it will be revised, and start looking forward to helping out with that fourth-quarter holiday GDP boost we all inevitably provide.

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Getting out of debt

Everyone hates debt. Get out of it.

View Course »

Intro to different retirement accounts

What does it mean to have a 401(k)? IRA?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

159 Comments

Filter by:
Wayne Bradshaw

Gucci sent their fall/winter 2012/2013 collection down the Milan Fashion Week runway today and it featured a much darker, more gothic and vampire-like color palette than what was shown by the iconic design house for fall 2011. One year ago Gucci Outlet showed bright colors and blocked them together, helping to explode the current color blocking trend. For fall 2012, Gucci moved away from the trend they started and let black rule the runway.

May 06 2012 at 12:05 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Wayne Bradshaw

Many People like the Louis Vuitton Handbags very much and would consider that the Louis Vuitton Company come from In italy , in fact it is born from paris in France.So you unlidely see real Louis Vuitton Outlet in other city except france. But please don't worry about that ,if you want to buy a cheap louis vuitton items ,you could search the Louis Vuitton Online in the internet,you can get the cheap louis vuitton handbags anywhere.

May 05 2012 at 11:49 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gooden

The spin is incredible! Do these Obama fawner/'journalists" think we're really THAT stupid?
Apparently so.
Add this drivel to the fact Obama ran against every program and method we used to put Osama Bin Laden in the cross hairs while he took months to make the call, and now hes running around like General Patton claiming he did it all!

Hey, Great One! Its STILL about the economy and WE'RE NOT STUPID!

May 02 2012 at 9:41 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
ha6ai

As usual, AOL/HuffPuff is a bizarre Obama-propagandist. Reading AOL/HuffPuff will make you cross-eyed.

Yup, we're supposed to be "happy" about the disastrous Obama-economy! LOL!

May 02 2012 at 12:50 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Daniel

Must have been written by an Obama supporter who is insane.

May 01 2012 at 3:15 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Brett Kuntze

CTRL + F

May 01 2012 at 3:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brett Kuntze

What about separate comments in today, yesterday , two days ago, ten years ago??

May 01 2012 at 3:04 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brett Kuntze

bOWWAH! :P :q :b :d :b :d :b :d :p :d

May 01 2012 at 3:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brett Kuntze

CAN YOU DO BETTER THAN THAT? IT GUY???????????

May 01 2012 at 3:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Brett Kuntze

LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!
LOAD MORE COMMENTS!!!

May 01 2012 at 3:01 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply