Is Cisco Trying to Rain on Microsoft's Parade?

    Posted 10:00PM 02/15/12 Posted under: Investing

    It looks like Cisco Systems (NAS: CSCO) is taking the saying "better late than never" a little too literally.

    Redmond software giant Microsoft (NAS: MSFT) made waves in May last year, when it announced its biggest acquisition ever: the $8.5 billion acquisition of video chatter Skype. I'm still scratching my head over why Mr. Softy wanted eBay's (NAS: EBAY) sloppy seconds in the first place, since the online auctioneer took a massive $1.4 billion charge on the trade, but that's neither here nor there.

    After six months of jumping through regulatory hoops, including receiving unconditional approval from the European Commission, Microsoft and Skype sealed the deal in October. Fast-forward nearly another six months, and Cisco is now appealing the EC's stamp of approval on the marriage. I guess the networking giant missed the whole "speak now or forever hold your peace" bit.

    To be clear, Cisco isn't looking to nullify the union altogether; rather, it now wants the regulator to add in some standards-based interoperability conditions on Microsoft. It's like saying, "Go ahead and get hitched; I just don't want you to honeymoon in Hawaii, Tahiti, France, Italy, Bora Bora, Las Vegas, the Bahamas, or Mexico, but I hear that North Dakota is nice this time of year."

    As a major player in video conferencing, Cisco is bent out of shape because Microsoft's Lync software and Skype both use proprietary technologies, and Cisco wasn't able to land a deal with Mr. Softy to ensure that its own apparatuses would be compatible.

    The company is trying to maintain its grip on the enterprise-videoconferencing market, particularly after rightly axing its misguided and overpriced Umi system that was supposedly geared toward consumers. Anyone could have told Cisco that consumers wouldn't be keen on the idea of forking over $600 upfront and $10 per month when Skype is available for the low-low cost of $0.

    Microsoft's official response was that the European Commission already conducted its "thorough investigation," and "Cisco actively participated," so it's pretty sure that there won't be any reneging.

    Sorry, Cisco, but you had your chance to object; now you have to forever hold your peace.

    Cisco is definitely not a top stock for 2012. The good news is that you can find out what company is The Motley Fool's Top Stock for 2012 by checking out this new special free report. This report comes directly from the desk of our chief investment officer, and it names a company that is poised to reap benefits in emerging markets and uses the same business model of two retail titans you probably visit every week. Check out the free report now.

    At the time this article was published Fool contributor Evan Niu holds no position in any company mentioned. Check out his holdings and a short bio. The Motley Fool owns shares of Cisco Systems and Microsoft. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of Microsoft, eBay, and Cisco Systems, writing puts in eBay, and creating a bull call spread position in Microsoft. Try any of our Foolish newsletter services free for 30 days. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.

    Copyright © 1995 - 2012 The Motley Fool, LLC. All rights reserved. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.



    Add a Comment

    *0 / 3000 Character Maximum

    4 Comments

    Filter by:
    troybob420

    While Cisco may want everyone to use TIP, the Cisco and recently aquired Tandberg products do interoperate with competitors over industry standard protocols. So yes, Cisco may want TIP, but it still will operate on other protocols. Not so much with Skype.

    The appeals is WAY late though :)

    February 15 2012 at 11:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
    Andrew E

    Cisco is still hooked on "video is the future" which is a metaphor for "buy more routers and switches to support video". Cisco should just join the UC Interoperability Forum as Keith points out below, that would be much easier and less expensive than fighting in court.

    Most people are moving away from real time communications using voice or video towards texting or IM anyway (and from cell TXT plans to internet based txt / IM plans) as evidenced by the wireless companies stats from around the world. Cisco should recognize what the consumers want instead of trying to force video down their throat or via lawsuit.

    February 15 2012 at 11:15 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
    W

    > ... Smell weakness anyone?

    Yup. They've got serious dangers from a multitude of fronts. Another big one, but you probably already know this, is viable enterprise-deployable network virtualization, ala Nicira.

    Disclosure: I don't work for or with any networking player. In fact, I use Cisco's stuff.

    February 15 2012 at 11:07 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
    Keith M Kabza

    This appeal is about one thing only securing standards-based interoperability in the video calling space.”

    CISCO has elected not to join the UC Interoperability Forum (UCIF)
    CISCO wants everyone to use TIP (Telepresence Interoperability Protocol)

    This claim is really quite humorous.
    http://ucif.org/AboutUs/UCIForumMembers.aspx where is CISCO?

    Does anyone honestly believe Cisco wants interoperability with Tandberg and Skype?

    If you can’t beat them and you won’t join them, challenge them in court, smell weakness anyone?

    February 15 2012 at 10:39 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply