The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?

×
Foster FriessIn this post-Citizens United era, every presidential candidate needs the backing of a super PAC, one of those independent political action committees that can accept unlimited contributions from corporations, unions, other groups and individuals. That applies even to incumbents: On Tuesday, President Barack Obama reversed himself and asked his financial backers to donate money to super PACs supporting his reelection campaign. Previously, the president had called unlimited spending by such groups "a threat to our democracy."

And behind each super PAC, it seems, is at least one extremely wealthy donor, committed for his own reasons to a particular candidate. Newt Gingrich has casino mogul Sheldon Adelson; Rick Santorum, who stunned the political world Tuesday night by winning three (admittedly nonbinding) state GOP contests -- in Colorado, Missouri and Minnesota -- has Foster S. Friess, a hugely successful investor who calls himself, rather immodestly, "the man atop the horse."

A Born-Again Philanthropist

In 1974, Friess founded the mutual fund management company Friess Associates, which currently has in excess of $4.6 billion in assets under management. Before that, Friess -- a Wisconsin native who grew up on a cattle ranch and studied business administration at the state university -- spent two years in Army Intelligence and served as director of research for a New York Stock Exchange firm. Friess is said to have sold 51% of his eponymous company in 2001 for $247 million, but reportedly still holds a 10% stake.

The central fact of Friess' personal life seems to be his status as a born-again Christian. Shortly after launching Friess Associates, he found himself, by his own account, in "a marriage flirting with divorce," raising "emotionally distant children." Citing Blaise Pascal's maxim -- "Within each person is a God-shaped vacuum that only God can fill" -- Friess found religion: In October 1978, he has said (with surprising casualness), "I did one of those 'born again' things and invited Jesus to become the 'Chairman of the Board' -- of my life."

The following decades saw him achieve massive success: Friess Associates' flagship Brandywine Fund averaged 20% annual gains in the 1990s; Business Week dubbed Friess the "longest surviving successful growth stock picker." (Buy-and-Hold Isn't His Style, announced the profile's headline.)

In the midst of these windfalls, the newly-minted Christian turned his attention to philanthropy. Friess cites Scripture as the inspiration for his financial altruism -- specifically, Galatians 6:2 ("When we carry one another's burdens, we fulfill the law of Christ") and Matthew 25:35-40 ("When you do it for the least of my brethren, you do it for Me") -- but his commitment to giving is braided together with sociopolitical conviction. Specifically, Friess holds a firm belief that "private individuals are called to carry others' burdens -- rather than relying on the government to do so." In support of that philosophy, Friess has gone so far as to offer a musical festival $40,000 on the condition that they refuse $11,000 in government funding. The event organizers accepted.

Friess' philanthropy is extensive -- his grant-making foundation is capitalized with more than $100 million -- and his desire to help others seems sincere. But the man atop the horse is given to strange, theatrical gestures. Take, for instance, the climax of the lavish four-day celebration he threw for his and his wife Lynette's 70th birthdays in July 2010. In the invitations, he had asked his 200 guests to identify their favorite charity (one that reflected Galatians 6:2, of course), and said that he would donate $70,000 (get it?) to the worthiest nominee.

With Four Seasons waiters handing out envelopes on silver platters, Friess instructed that the winner should stand up and shout in celebration while everyone else remained seated. As the envelopes were opened, WyoFile reports, "people exploded up from every table, shouting 'I won! I won!' The Friesses had surprised their guests by writing $70,000 checks to every one of the nominated charities -- a show of generosity that cost them $7.7 million. (In most cases, each couple at the party designated a single charity.)"

Foster FriessThe Political Calculus of Choosing Santorum

It was probably inevitable that someone as rich as Friess, with such adamant convictions on questions of society and government, would wind up being a major political donor. But why Santorum?

Strongly-held religious beliefs are an obvious point of connection. Santorum has long been animated by his Catholic faith, vocally opposing abortion and gay rights. (He famously lumped homosexuality together with pedophilia and bestiality in an interview with the Associated Press.)

Crucially, the statement on government found on Friess' website mentions "economic freedom" (emphasis added), along with government efficiency and individual responsibility. Thus, Friess' commitment to limited government might not be in conflict with Santorum's belief that government has the right "to limit individuals' wants and passions ... because there are consequences to letting people live out whatever wants or passions they desire." (Compare that with Friess's assertion that "we Americans today cede too much power to our elected representatives, and we need to take that power back.")

Friess also expresses deep concern over the threat he perceives from radical Islam, which he has called "the most threatening movement in the world today," "more powerful than Nazism or even Communism ever was." Santorum is simpatico with Friess here, having been outspoken in defending America's war in Iraq and taking a hard line against Iran. But so is Newt Gingrich -- and the super PAC to which Friess is the largest donor, the Red White and Blue Fund, has given to the former Speaker of the House as well. But the amount the group has spent on pro-Gingrich ads -- more than $70,000 -- is eclipsed by the $2.2 million spent so far on Santorum. By comparison, the former Pennsylvania senator's campaign has spent less than $1 million dollars on its own so far.

Ultimately, Friess' support for Santorum, whom he has said he will back through March, appears to be based on the calculus of electability. Friess wants a GOP nominee who can beat Barack Obama, whose stances on taxes and health care he opposes, and in his view, Santorum is the man to do it.

"From his genuine appeal to blue collar families to his intelligent thinking about policy, Santorum is emerging to be the best shot at a victory for Founding Father values in 2012," reads a blog post on Friess' website. Romney and Gingrich are too compromised, in Friess's eyes, by their past support for climate change legislation, Wall Street bailouts, and individual mandates in health care.

But if Santorum should falter as the Republican primary process drags on, count on Friess to channel more of his millions towards whoever emerges as the eventual nominee. And Friess's fortune is denominated in millions: For all his success, he is not, contrary to some reports, a billionaire. "Hope I make it some day," Friess told a reporter for Forbes, "and will be on your list."

Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Building Credit from Scratch

Start building credit...now.

View Course »

How much house can I afford

Home buying 101, evaluating one of your most important financial decisions.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

976 Comments

Filter by:
MissouriConservative

Gingrich, Santorum and Obama all come from that venerated institution called Congress which is at an all time low approval rating. Washington, as Herman Cain said, cannot fix Washington.

Santorum, however, says he regrets voting for the education reform bill,
and he would support a national right-to-work law as president. On
earmarks, the candidate has said the practice was popular among.
Republican lawmakers while he was in office but now opposes it, claiming.
the system has become abused.

So, according to Rick, it was OK to spend like a bat out of hell until he.
has to "be conservative" and coddle to the same Tea Party he criticized.
before. Two candidates I believe in, Ron Paul will eliminate most.
anything the Federal government has no business being involved in and.
Romney who has cut the size of government and balanced a budget getting.
it to a surplus. Gingrich and Santorum want to fix Washington with the.
tools of Washington. When all you have ever used is a hammer, it all.
looks like a nail! Congress cannot fix Congress nor Washington. Cain is right about that. We are on the verge of nominating someone else from the failed institution of Congress, because he is not Romney and not a Mormon. Obama came from Congress, Santorum the same. Do you honestly have expectations of improvement?

Santorum will peak and the polls will show him coming back to earth just like Perry,
Cain and Gingrich. As he is truly vetted, he is ONLY a social.
conservative. Where I live, the Tea Party people know that fiscal sanity.
is what is needed or we are tomorrow's Greece. Romney has at least.
balanced state and Olympic budgets and gotten them in the black. Have
him put Paul in charge of eliminating programs that the Feds should have.
left to the states to begin with. It is the economy and the 10th.

February 17 2012 at 12:05 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
MissouriConservative

Test

February 17 2012 at 11:17 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MissouriConservative

Earth to voters. Any intelligent life here?

Santorum, however, says he regrets voting for the education reform bill,
and he would support a national right-to-work law as president. On
earmarks, the candidate has said the practice was popular among
Republican lawmakers while he was in office but now opposes it, claiming
the system has become abused.

So,according to Rick, it was OK to spend like a bat out of hell until he
has to "be conservative" and coddle to the same Tea Party he criticized
before. Two candidates I believe in, Ron Paul will eliminate most
anything the Federal government has no business being involved in and
Romney who has cut the size of government and balanced a budget getting
it to a surplus. Gingrich and Santorum want to fix Washington with the
tools of Washington. When all you have ever used is a hammer, it all
looks like a nail! Congress cannot fix Congress nor Washington. Cain is right about that. We are on the verge of nominating someone else from the failed institution of Congress, because he is not Romney and not a Mormon. Obama came from Congress, Santorum the same. Do you honestly have expectations of improvement?

Santorum will peak and the polls will show him coming back to earth just like Perry,
Cain and Gingrich. As he is truly vetted, he is ONLY a social
conservative. Where I live, the Tea Party people know that fiscal sanity
is what is needed or we are tomorrow's Greece. Romney has at least
balanced state and Olympic budgets and gotten them in the black. Have
him put Paul in charge of eliminating programs that the Feds should have
left to the states to begin with. It is the economy and the 10th
amendment stupid!
We already have a former Senator in the White House and we are stupid enough to believe that the same institution which is at about 11% approval rating is going to provide with solutions that Santorum never had while in that venerable institution? How stupid are we, especially my fellow Tea Party people who want fiscal restraint? I am afraid we are about to find out.

February 17 2012 at 11:15 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
MissouriConservative

Santorum, however, says he regrets voting for the education reform bill,
and he would support a national right-to-work law as president. On
earmarks, the candidate has said the practice was popular among
Republican lawmakers while he was in office but now opposes it, claiming
the system has become abused.

So,according to Rick, it was OK to spend like a bat out of hell until he
has to "be conservative" and coddle to the same Tea Party he criticized
before. Two candidates I believe in, Ron Paul will eliminate most
anything the Federal government has no business being involved in and
Romney who has cut the size of government and balanced a budget getting
it to a surplus. Gingrich and Santorum want to fix Washington with the
tools of Washington. When all you have ever used is a hammer, it all
looks like a nail! Congress cannot fix Congress nor Washington. Cain is right about that. We are on the verge of nominating someone else from the failed institution of Congress, because he is not Romney and not a Mormon. Obama came from Congress, Santorum the same. Do you honestly have expectations of improvement?

Santorum will peak and the polls will show him coming back to earth just like Perry,
Cain and Gingrich. As he is truly vetted, he is ONLY a social
conservative. Where I live, the Tea Party people know that fiscal sanity
is what is needed or we are tomorrow's Greece. Romney has at least
balanced state and Olympic budgets and gotten them in the black. Have
him put Paul in charge of eliminating programs that the Feds should have
left to the states to begin with. It is the economy and the 10th
amendment stupid!
We already have a former Senator in the White House and we are stupid enough to believe that the same institution which is at about 11% approval rating is going to provide with solutions that Santorum never had while in that venerable institution? How stupid are we, especially my fellow Tea Party people who want fiscal restraint? I am afraid we are about to find out.

February 17 2012 at 11:14 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
miserabloldefart

The brilliance that is Rush LImbaugh
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-TxzJ8EGDPQ&feature=related

February 16 2012 at 3:51 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
miserabloldefart

"Tax cuts for the rich create new jobs. You're getting sleepy."

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ege_RBhh37A

February 16 2012 at 3:38 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
miserabloldefart

Not to insult anyone by getting back to the topic of this article, but apparently this paragon of GOPer virtue now claims that women should use an aspirin between their knees for contraception. What a sport!!

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/02/16/idUS87175227720120216

February 16 2012 at 3:35 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
usacars

Read this:
A chemistry professor at a large college had some exchange students in the class. One day while the class was in the lab the Professor noticed one young man (exchange student) who kept rubbing his back, and stretching as if his back hurt. The professor asked the young man what was the matter. The student told him he had a bullet lodged in his back. He had been shot while fighting communists in his native country who were trying to overthrow his country's government and install a new communist government.

In the midst of his story he looked at the professor and asked a strange question. He asked, 'Do you know how to catch wild pigs?' The professor thought it was a joke and asked for the punch line. The young man said this was no joke. 'You catch wild pigs by finding a suitable place in the woods and putting corn on the ground. The pigs find it and begin to come every day to eat the free corn. When they are used to coming every day, you put a fence down one side of the place where they are used to coming. When they get used to the fence, they begin to eat the corn again and you put up another side of the fence. They get used to that and start to eat again.

You continue until you have all four sides of the fence up with a gate in the last side. The pigs, who are used to the free corn, start to come through the gate to eat; you slam the gate on them and catch the whole herd. Suddenly the wild pigs have lost their freedom. They run around and around inside the fence, but they are caught.

Soon they go back to eating the free corn. They are so used to it that they have forgotten how to forage in the woods for themselves, so they accept their captivity.

The young man then told the professor that is exactly what he sees happening to America. The government keeps pushing us toward socialism and keeps spreading the free corn out in the form of programs such as supplemental income, tax credit for unearned income, tobacco subsidies, dairy subsidies, payments not to plant crops (CRP), welfare, medicine, drugs, etc. While we continually lose our freedoms -- just a little at a time.

February 16 2012 at 10:35 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to usacars's comment
miserabloldefart

Much easier to catch stupid people- just dish out a lot of stale baloney.. works for FOX Noose and the GOP every day.

February 16 2012 at 3:31 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
usacars

An important message from Obuma and the Liberals.
http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/norman-wolfe/leading-living-organization/catch-wild-pig-society-parable-and-lessons-leaders

February 16 2012 at 10:32 AM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to usacars's comment
miserabloldefart

Again, easier to catch stupid people, just sling the old baloney.. works for FOX and the GOP every single day. But will it be enough on November 4th, or is America finally waking up to the malignancy of modern fascism? Stay tuned.

February 16 2012 at 3:37 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
hdvh56

Wow,look how the paid per spew trolls have hijacked the thread with their nonsense.

February 15 2012 at 2:34 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply