The 8 Brands That Wasted the Most Money on Super Bowl Ads

Chevy runs deepA 30-second ad spot in this year's Super Bowl cost an average of $3.5 million. That's an 84% increase from 10 years ago and the highest amount advertisers have ever had to pay. While that is quite the price hike, it is in line with the growth in TV audience, which has just about doubled over the past decade. But despite spending so much to reach such a massive audience at once, the results are rarely impressive.

Between 2002 and 2011, companies spent $2.5 billion on Super Bowl advertising, based on 24/7 Wall St.'s estimate. The top 10 spenders were responsible for more than one-third of that. And one company, Budweiser maker Anheuser-Busch, spent almost $250 million over the past 10 years on Super Bowl ads, a whopping one-tenth of the total.

24/7 Wall St. ranked total spending for all of the companies that advertised during the Super Bowl in the past decade. An analysis of the top spenders reflects how bad this investment can be. While some, such as Hyundai and Toyota have improved market share over that time, most have not. Based on total ad spending, product failures, change in market share, share price and sales, we identified the eight brands that wasted the most on the Super Bowl, including mega brands such as Coke, Budweiser, GM and Ford.

The top spenders fall into four major categories: automotive, film, food, including snacks and fast food, and beverages. Four of the top 10 Super Bowl advertisers are auto companies. Another four are food and beverage manufacturers. Three movie studios are in the top 25.

Because Super Bowl ads are dominated by a small number of industries, many companies in those industries are forced to advertise just to keep up. Most of the top 10 spenders are perennial also-rans. Yum! Brands, owner of KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut, spent $67 million over the past 10 years. Meanwhile, McDonald's, the indisputable market leader, spent less than half that amount and is not a top 10 spender. Similarly, E*Trade, well-known for the talking baby campaign, spent more than any other online brokerage firm, yet remains fourth in the industry.

24/7 Wall St. tabulated all of the commercials from the past 10 Super Bowls, as archived by Adland, the "world's largest archive of Super Bowl commercials." Using that data, 24/7 calculated the number of commercials each company bought, as well as their length, including any available pregame, postgame and prime advertising commercials. To estimate the total amount each company spent on Super Bowl advertising in the past decade, we used the average costs of a 30-second commercial spot each year and the total number of minutes of advertising time recorded by Adland.
These are the eight brands that wasted the most on the Super Bowl.

8. E*Trade

Total ad spending (2002-2011): $35.9 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 6
Average ads per Super Bowl: 2.5
Change in share price (2002-current): -91.1%
Change in market share: n/a

E*Trade (ETFC) has run Super Bowl ads in the past five years, as well as in 2002, attempting to make headway against larger online trading competitors Fidelity Investments, Charles Schwab and TD Ameritrade. With an average of 2.5 ads per game, E*Trade has run 6.75 minutes of Super Bowl ads over the past 10 years. Although the company's ad campaigns have varied, its most popular campaign features the E*Trade talking baby, which debuted during Super Bowl XLII in 2008. Although that ad resulted in a record-breaking number of new accounts for the company, E*Trade's overall share price has decreased 91.1% since February 2002.



7. Ford

Total ad spending (2002-2011): $36.3 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 5
Average ads per Super Bowl: 2.2
Change in share price (2002-current): -17.1%
Change in market share: 20.2% (2002), 16.8% (2011)
Despite the fact that Ford (F) is one of the most iconic American brands, it has not run an ad during the Super Bowl since 2008. In that year, the company only ran one 30-second commercial. Competitors GM and Hyundai ran several ads that year and have each run at least five since then. When it was still running commercials, Ford advertised specific vehicles, including the Focus, Escape and the F-150. The 2006 commercial for the Escape Hybrid featured Kermit the Frog, who reported that it was actually "easy being green." While the advertisement was memorable, it also marked the year before the Escape Hybrid's sales peaked.



6. Warner Bros.

Total ad spending (2002-2011): $48.6 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 4
Average ads per Super Bowl: 4.75
Change in share price (2002-current): -51.6%
Change in market share: 11.7% (2002), 17.9% (2011)

Warner Bros. (TWX) has spent an enormous amount of money over the years advertising major motion pictures during the Super Bowl. Some, such as The Matrix Reloaded, Troy, and Batman Begins, became highly successful blockbusters. Showing trailers during the Super Bowl is only growing more popular for studios: Last year, a record 14 trailers were shown. The market share for Warner Bros. films increased from 11.7% to 17.9% between 2002 and 2011, but many of the movies it advertised during Super Bowls were complete flops. Films like Poseidon and Constantine grossed far less in the U.S. than they cost to make. Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines grossed $150 million domestically -- nearly $50 million less than its budget -- despite the fact that Warner bought more than two minutes in ads for the movie during the 2003 Super Bowl (and at $2.2 million for 30 seconds, they weren't cheap back then either).



5. Coca-Cola

Total ad spending (2002-2011): $61.0 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 5
Average ads per Super Bowl: 2.8
Change in share price (2002-current): +51.8%
Change in market share: 44.3% (2002), 42.0% (2010)

Even though Coca-Cola (KO) has only advertised for the past five years of the decade, it has spent more than almost every other advertiser. Since 2007, Coca-Cola has run several ads each year, including two 60-second commercials in 2011 that cost an estimated $12.4 million in ad time alone. Coke commercials during the Super Bowl are usually fantastic, and last year was no different. One ad featured a dragon drinking the beverage. In the other, two border guards representing opposing countries put aside their national differences to focus on their mutual love of the drink. Between 2000 and 2010, Coca-Cola Classic sales declined 22% in gallons sold.







4. Yum! Brands
Total ad spending (2002-2011): $67.8 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 9
Average ads per Super Bowl: 3
Change in share price (2002-current): +366%
Change in market share: 37% (2000), 28% (2011)
Yum! Brands (YUM) is one of the largest fast food companies in the world, operating chains including KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut. When the company spends on Super Bowl advertising, it usually avoids pushing its most popular brand, KFC. Only five of the company's 27 Super Bowl commercials in the past decade advertised Colonel Sanders' restaurant. Instead, Yum! focuses on its smaller brands, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell, with 12 and 10 ads over that time, respectively. Yum! Brands' share price has increased 366% since 2002, due in large part to its international expansion. KFC, Taco Bell and Pizza Hut sales combined are still leagues behind McDonald's.


3. General Motors

Total ad spending (2002-2011): $135.2 million
Super Bowls advertised in over last ten years: 8
Average ads per Super Bowl: 5.5
Change in share price (2002-current): filed chapter 11 in 2009
Change in market share: ~29% (2002), 19.6% (2011)

Four automakers were among the top 10 spenders, but none of the others spent anywhere close to what General Motors (GM) has. GM bought more than $135 million-worth of commercial time during the big games. Even though GM didn't advertise in 2009 or 2010, while it was going through bankruptcy and reemergence, it still spent more than Ford, Toyota and Hyundai combined. In 2005, the company ran 13 separate commercials -- tying it with Pepsi and Anheuser-Busch for the most in a single year. Last year, the carmaker ran five commercials, all of which were Chevy ads, including one produced in collaboration with DreamWorks for the then-upcoming Transformers sequel.



2. PepsiCo
Total ad spending (2002-2011): $209.7 million
Super Bowls advertised in over past 10 years: 10
Average ads per Super Bowl: 7.2
Change in share price (2002-current): +32.4%
Change in market share: 31.4% (2002) – 29.3% (2010)
Although it trails Coke in most ways, PepsiCo (PEP) is the No. 1 soft drink company when it comes to Super Bowl advertising. Over the past decade, the company has spent over $200 million on advertising its products during the games, airing an average of 7.2 ads per year. Of course, it advertises much more than just Pepsi Cola: Its Super Bowl commercials push Gatorade, Sierra Mist, SoBe, Tostitos, Doritos and more. In 2010, PepsiCo spent more than $358 million on television advertising compared to Coca-Cola's $277 million. PepsiCo also aired 72 Super Bowl ads over the past 10 years compared to Coke's 14. Despite all this, Coca-Cola remains the king of carbonated beverages. And the volume of regular Pepsi sold dropped 32% between 2001 and 2010.








1. Anheuser-Busch
Total ad spending (2002-2011): $246.2 million
Super Bowls advertised in over last ten years: 10
Average ads per Super Bowl: 8.7
Change in share price (2002-current): N/A (was purchased by InBev in 2008)
Change in market share: 52% (2002), 48.3% (2011)
Since 2002, Anheuser-Busch, the maker of Budweiser beer, bought close to a quarter of a billion dollars in Super Bowl advertising -- one-tenth of the total for all advertisers. The American beverage company was purchased in 2008 by Belgian InBev, forming one massive beverage company -- Anheuser-Busch InBev (BUD). That year, the company purchased 13 separate Super Bowl ads for nearly $40 million -- the second-most spent by any company on ads in single year. Budweiser's commercials have featured some of advertisings most iconic animals, including football-playing Clydesdales, jealous lizards, and more recently, partying dogs. Bud Light and Budweiser used to be the first- and second-most popular beers in the U.S. But despite its massive ad campaigns, the company lost the No. 2 spot to Coors Light in 2011.


-- Charles B. Stockdale, Michael B. Sauter and Ashley C. Allen

Learn about investing from the comfort of your own home.

Portfolio Basics

Take the first steps to building your portfolio.

View Course »

Investment Strategies

Learn the strategies you need to build a winning portfolio

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

2 Comments

Filter by:
Fredy

From what we know, candy, confectionery and tobacco are the most heavily advertised products in America. Source: cigarettespub.net/cigarettes-news/cigarettes-the-most-advertised-products

November 28 2012 at 5:10 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
elendil3136

There is more to payback than share prices. Sometimes, ads can be the difference between surviving and being eaten. You cannot put a dollar on the value of buzz for your product, though accountants always do, even if they have no idea how to do it.

February 07 2012 at 3:03 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply