Readers' Tips for Financial Renewal, Part 3: Investing for the Long Term

×
investingA few weeks ago, we asked DailyFinance readers for their best tips for putting your financial house in order. Many offered advice on saving and careful spending, but the general consensus was that the best route to financial security lies in making your money work for you. And, ultimately, most agreed, that requires patience: While some suggested ways to achieve fast gains, most agreed that staying in the market for the long haul is the best way to ensure that you end up with a full bank account -- not an empty wallet.

Before we go any further, a caveat: While some of those who offered advice claim to be certified investment professionals, we did not verify their credentials or their claims. We're passing on many of their investment suggestions, but we ask our readers to take these suggestions advisedly -- and to consult with an investment professional before making any bold moves.

Slow and Steady Wins the Race

Many of those who offered advice began with the idea of defining your goals: Start by figuring out where you want to end up -- and what it will take to get you there. "Meek6" advises readers to calculate how much money they need "to generate income for the future and keep the principal intact." Once you reach that amount, he suggests, "retire when your financial bucket is full."

"Ed P" suggests that we "stick with a diversified group of mutual funds and hang on through thick and thin." Aged 70, he writes that "I have moved about one third of my portfolio into various fixed income funds." Given the fluctuations of the market, Ed's strategy may seem overly optimistic, but in his view, the future isn't quite so cloudy: "Just have a little faith that the capitalist system will rebound and survive."

"Francesmous" suggests a similarly restrained strategy: "You should always invest not with the goal of 'making a killing,' but of holding on to a solid stock for the long haul." With that in mind, she advises, the key is finding long-term, consistently performing stocks, not short-term Roman candles that are likely to flame out: "Do your homework and select stocks that pay a reasonable dividend and that have performed well historically," she suggests. "Put as much effort into choosing a stock as you would when researching a new car purchase."

Go With What You Know

And what do those stocks look like? Sometimes, opines "Chris W," they're brands you already know and trust. When he decided to manage his own money, he focused on "a couple of stocks with publicly available information, and importantly, companies whose products/services I could understand." In his case, they were Apple, Ford and Google, although he pulled out of the carmaker when things started to go south. But now that Ford is doing better, he's reconsidering: "I now like Ford again. I may lighten up on Apple a bit at some point in the near future and put one third of my money back in Ford."

Chris isn't the only reader who likes Ford, although others viewed the automaker's stock more as a short-term investment. "JMoss111" says his strategy is to "Watch for stocks that have tanked, but you know the company isn't going away." The example he uses is Ford, which he says he "bought at $3.00 and sold at $17."

But while JMoss111's short-term strategy worked out well in that instance, most readers advise taking the long view. "Doc Dearth" advises "dollar cost averaging," a strategy that involves consistently investing the same amount of money at specific time intervals -- every paycheck, for instance. Using this method, DocDearth notes, "you buy more stocks, mutual funds, or ETFs when the market is down and less when it is up." Done properly, dollar cost averaging "eliminates and evens out the fluctuations and volatility the market gyrations that scare people off."

"Sue S." agrees with a lot of the preceding advice, but she's applying it to a different asset class: real estate. Part of her strategy lies in thinking about long-term fundamentals, not short-term gains: "While most of the nation was caught up in the housing frenzy, my husband and I invested in a small college town. We started slow and plan to hold on to the properties for a long time." The college town idea was solid -- after all, higher education is a growth industry, and students will always need a place to lay their heads. In Susan's case, the first place they bought "has been consistently rented to college students," and has paved the way for other purchases.

Everyone Loves Dividends

Those who submitted advice universally agreed that it's worthwhile to pursue stocks and mutual funds that pay dividends. Likewise, all suggested that the smart move is to continually re-invest those dividends, as it effectively compounds the investment. "Ray" notes that his dividends are a major source of income: "My annual dividends now exceed the amount I invest on an annual basis."

But not all investment decisions are so easy ... or so uncontroversial. For example, "Doc Dearth" strongly encourages readers to max out their 401(k) investments. In his view, if you aren't taking full advantage of your employer's 401(k) or similar plan -- and especially getting the full matching funds they offer, you're being "beyond foolish. There is no better way to save and invest regularly than having this money deducted directly from your pay check."

But "Rogsuehull" advises exactly the opposite course: "Ditch the high cost mutual funds in IRA's and 401k's as soon as you can," he says. Instead, he suggests, "Convert to high dividend individual stocks as you go."

That contrarian advice aside, Rogsuehull also offered some of the conventional wisdom offered by other readers, noting that investors should buy stock for the long run, should invest additional money every month, and should reinvest dividends. Steady investing, he says, will make you "happy for the rest of your life."

Bruce Watson is a senior features writer for DailyFinance. You can reach him by e-mail at bruce.watson@teamaol.com, or follow him on Twitter at @bruce1971.


Previous articles in This Series
• Readers' Tips for Financial Revival, Part 1: Smart Saving
• Readers' Tips for Financial Revival, Part 2: Spend Wisely





Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Forex for Beginners

Learn about trading currencies and foreign exchange transactions

View Course »

Professional Vs Do it Yourself Investing

Should you get advice or DYI?

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

19 Comments

Filter by:
Julie

Very informative article on long term investing. There are lots of obstacles that get in the way when you are trying to stick to your long term investment plans. There is actually a great article on the psychology of long term investing here:

http://blog.sprinklebit.com/the-psychology-of-long-term-investing/

Once you figure out your desired strategy, the trick is just to stick to your original plans.

November 26 2012 at 10:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Forex Programmer

long-term investment is one of the best ways to invest from my point of view, however patience is one of the most important points here and we must invest in solid companies and consolidated, it will bring long-term benefits, but we must cool head to make good decisions

September 17 2012 at 12:19 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Shruti Verma

thanks a lot for sharing such nice information !!!
http://www.currencytips.co.in

March 07 2012 at 9:59 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
gopispoison666

Ah, I finally came across the perfect instructional video for all you righties. I truly enjoy this one, and I'm sure you will as well. Good to see there are people in this world who maintain a sense of humor through it all - well done!

Here's the video you righties will want to show your kids, to help them be educated, JUST-LIKE-YOU!!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tV8P-vib5n8&feature=related

February 13 2012 at 10:54 PM Report abuse +1 rate up rate down Reply
Mike

MOFKR
Mike, that is absolutely asinine, no matter how many times you paste it. Employers do not produce the products. They OWN the PLANT and equipment, and the workers produce the product. End of story.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------THEY DO OWN THE PLANT! If you had EVER studied economics 101 you would have learned that the three factors of production ( that means the 3 things it takes to produce anything ) are Land, labor, & capitol. Hence by definition if ALL 3 factors are not present then there is NO production, no producing can be done! ONLY those that bring ALL 3 factors are producers. Labor does NOT bring LAND ( plant ) or the CAPITOL. BY DEFINITION WORKERS ARE NOT PRODUCERS THEY ARE WORKERS PAID FOR BY PRODUCERS. A worker is only worth what is costs to replace them either with another worker or automation. That is; “the PRICE of labor is subject to the two ( only two) factors of PRICE supply & demand“. Thank you for such a clear example of libtard absolute ignorance to fundamental principles of economics. This is why most libtards have been displaced (fired) from employ. Got gold?

February 10 2012 at 9:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

MOFKER
The difference between UNION workers and NONUNION workers is that union workers get a little more of what they produce, and get robbed a little less. But because they do that, and because they fight for the betterment of ALL workers, EVERYONE who works for a living benefits from the unions.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------workers do NOT produce their employers are the producers. Workers are an expense and largely replaceable with automation. Further proof if your a PRODUCER then why are you NOT out in the market directly with your OWN company? Because you do not have and /or willing to put all three factors of PRODUCTION at risk, Your Land (purchased or rented) labor, and CAPITAL. Takes all three factors put at risk AND fully funded by the individual to be a producer. You have severely over valued yourself. This is why most libtards have been thrown into the street (fired ). Got gold?

Yes we are sooo lucky we don't pay more to the educrats, lawyers, politicians and all other federally paid parasites. How about we close federalism all together and stop being billed for any of it. We 50 state govts to do the job and we already over pay them. Fire the leaches end the fed! Got gold?

February 10 2012 at 9:21 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

MOFKR
Mike, that is absolutely asinine, no matter how many times you paste it. Employers do not produce the products. They OWN the PLANT and equipment, and the workers produce the product. End of story.-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------THEY DO OWN THE PLANT! If you had EVER studied economics 101 you would have learned that the three factors of production ( that means the 3 things it takes to produce anything ) are Land, labor, & capitol. Hence by definition if ALL 3 factors are not present then there is NO production, no producing can be done! ONLY those that bring ALL 3 factors are producers. Labor does NOT bring LAND ( plant ) or the CAPITOL. BY DEFINITION WORKERS ARE NOT PRODUCERS THEY ARE WORKERS PAID FOR BY PRODUCERS. A worker is only worth what is costs to replace them either with another worker or automation. That is; “the PRICE of labor is subject to the two ( only two) factors of PRICE supply & demand“. Thank you for such a clear example of libtard absolute ignorance to fundamental principles of economics. This is why most libtards have been displaced (fired) from employ. Got gold?

February 07 2012 at 10:10 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Mike

MOFKER
The difference between UNION workers and NONUNION workers is that union workers get a little more of what they produce, and get robbed a little less. But because they do that, and because they fight for the betterment of ALL workers, EVERYONE who works for a living benefits from the unions.---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------workers do NOT produce their employers are the producers. Workers are an expense and largely replaceable with automation. Further proof if your a PRODUCER then why are you NOT out in the market directly with your OWN company? Because you do not have and /or willing to put all three factors of PRODUCTION at risk, Your Land (purchased or rented) labor, and CAPITAL. Takes all three factors put at risk AND fully funded by the individual to be a producer. You have severely over valued yourself. This is why most libtards have been thrown into the street (fired ). Got gold?

February 07 2012 at 10:09 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
satki49576

donald trump vice president,going to great.

February 07 2012 at 5:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Craig

Return our money to the Gold Standard, institute Price controls reducing costs to the Reagan '80s before the wage stagnation ofthe last 30 years. Tax the hell out of spculators and day trades. Level all income at 30 % tax regardless of the source, and above all, buy only what you really need, and use what you buy to death.

February 07 2012 at 5:23 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply