Do Super Bowl Ads Score for Their Companies' Stocks?

×
etradeSuper Bowl Sunday is coming and you know what that means: Coca-Cola (KO) polar bears will be hamming it up, the E*TRADE (ETFC) Baby will charm viewers, and Audi's new LED headlights are going to do in some vampires. Ferris Bueller will even make a surprising return.

Yes, the New England Patriots and New York Giants will interrupt the entertainment to run some football plays, but everyone knows that the Super Bowl is really all about the commercials.

With advertisers spending a record average of $3.5 million this year for 30 seconds of pitch time, sponsors certainly seem to think that they'll be getting their money's worth. But will their shareholders feel the same way?

Calling an Audible for Attention

Gauging a market campaign's Super Bowl spot relative to its share price isn't as easy as it sounds. Some advertisers -- including LivingSocial and Teleflora last year -- aren't public. Some products are also part of much larger companies. A clever Doritos ad isn't going to be seen as a major score for its parent company, PepsiCo (PEP).

However, let's go over a few of the memorable ads from last year's Super Bowl game that are pure plays on publicly traded companies.
  • Best Buy (BBY) had the genius star-studded pairing of rock legend Ozzy Osbourne with teen idol Justin Bieber in a spot for its then-new buyback protection program. The ad may have been clever, but the market was still left wondering why it would need to pay more for a product for the sake of the restrictive obsolescence insurance that the consumer electronics retailer was providing. The stock fell 0.7% on the Monday after the Super Bowl, and tumbled 4.6% over the course of the week. Things haven't gotten any better for Best Buy, now off 26% since last year's Super Bowl commercial.
  • The E*TRADE Baby came back, this time with his tailor. The discount broker's ad showed how easy it was to get a novice investor up to speed in building an impressive portfolio. Sadly, the same thing can't be said of E*TRADE's stock itself over the long haul. The stock did pop 2.2% higher on the Monday after the ad aired -- and 4.2% on the week -- but it has gone on to shed more than half of its value.
  • PepsiCo had several ads for both Pepsi MAX and Doritos. Those didn't seem to move the stock at all. The soda-and-salty-snacks giant saw its shares slip 0.2% on Super Bowl Monday, closing flat on the week. However, unlike Best Buy and E*TRADE, PepsiCo is actually trading higher these days -- up by 6%.
  • And then there's salesforce.com (CRM), which spent a lot of money promoting Chatter during last year's Super Bowl. And today, how many people know that Chatter is a cloud-based company communications platform? The answer shows that Super Bowl ads may not even influence consumers, let alone the stock price.

For an even longer view of post-game stock performance we can rewind even further -- past last year's ads and into Super Bowl commercial highlights of yore.

Apple's (AAPL) 1984 ad -- the futuristic commercial directed by Ridley Scott -- made its national debut during the third quarter of Super Bowl XVIII in 1984. If you were fortunate enough to have bought Apple that year -- and held on through the company's rocky 1990s -- you'd be sitting on a 100-bagger today.

However, we can also look to all of the Super Bowl ads by cash-rich and profit-poor dot-coms ahead of the Internet bubble that popped. The doomed Pets.com had a Super Bowl ad in 2000. Yahoo! (YHOO) gave television's costliest stage a swing with its talking dolphin ad in 2002. There's a surprising end to that one, though: Yahoo! shares have actually more than doubled since that time on a split-adjusted basis.

But memorable ads will only get you so far. Anheuser-Busch (BUD) has had some of the game's most notable ads. (Everyone remembers the Bud-weis-er frogs, the "Whassup?" guys, and classy Clydesdale horse clips.) And, yes, the company has definitely been a quality investment over the years across several incarnations. Even so, earlier this month, Coors Light overtook Budweiser as the country's second-most-popular beer by volume. And while Anheuser-Busch can take heart in knowing that its Bud Light is still the top dog in beer consumption, it still must ask: Were all those frogs talking for naught?

So do Super Bowl ads ultimately influence a stock's price? No, if all you do is spend $3.5 billion for an ad this weekend. If the product or service you're promoting will move the needle for your company, well, that's something else entirely.

Longtime Motley Fool contributor Rick Munarriz does not own shares in any of the stocks in this article. The Motley Fool owns shares of Apple, Coca-Cola, Yahoo!, PepsiCo, and Best Buy. Motley Fool newsletter services have recommended buying shares of salesforce.com, Coca-Cola, Yahoo!, PepsiCo, and Apple. Motley Fool newsletter services have also recommended writing covered calls in Best Buy, creating a bull call spread position in Apple, creating a diagonal call position in PepsiCo, and shorting salesforce.com.


Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Socially Responsible Investing

Invest in companies with a conscience.

View Course »

Investing in Emerging Markets

Learn to invest in a globalized world.

View Course »

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

7 Comments

Filter by:
Kay

Not for me! I think that most of the Super Bowl Ads are just plain STUPID! Only a few are even funny. I see people laughing and I wonder what the HECK they are laughing at. Oh thats right, they get paid to laugh! And I avoid all products that are advertised on the Super Bowl program

February 02 2012 at 12:20 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
vlady1000

I make it a point to avoid buying a product that is advertised at that cost. That extra cost is burried in the price of the product you are buying somewhere.

February 01 2012 at 9:57 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Patsy

Well there ya go...all that money wasted on ads that bring no real profits back. I enjoy the ads, but I could do without them. They are not the reason for the game...the game is the reason for them.

February 01 2012 at 6:26 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Bob

Not exactly. Their money is made when they get a tax deduction for advertising purposes.

February 01 2012 at 1:43 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
BLONDIE & GRUMPY

So do Super Bowl ads ultimately influence a stock's price? No, if all you do is spend $3.5 billion for an ad this weekend... This goes to show they don't proof read the copy... it's $3.5 Million... not Billion...

February 01 2012 at 12:11 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
savemycountry911

A baby speaking like an adult is just creepy.

January 31 2012 at 8:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Randall

my neighbor's step-mother made $23559 so far just working on the laptop for a few hours. Here's the site to read more...qr.net/fx5x

January 31 2012 at 5:59 PM Report abuse -1 rate up rate down Reply