- Days left

Don't Get Audited! The IRS's Dirty Dozen Red Flags

×
Audit By Joy Taylor, assistant editor, The Kiplinger Tax Letter

Ever wonder why some tax returns get intense scrutiny from the Internal Revenue Service while most are ignored? The agency doesn't have enough personnel and resources to examine each and every tax return filed during a year -- it audits only slightly more than 1% of all individual returns annually.

So the odds are pretty low that your return will be picked for review. And, of course, the only reason filers should worry about an audit is if they are fudging on their taxes. But even if you have nothing to hide, an audit is no picnic.

Here are 12 red flags that could increase your chances of drawing some unwanted attention:





Read more: http://www.kiplinger.com/slideshow/tax_audit_redflags/13.html#ixzz1kgDBQ7GI
Become a Fan of Kiplinger's on Facebook



Increase your money and finance knowledge from home

Introduction to Preferred Shares

Learn the difference between preferred and common shares.

View Course »

Intro to different retirement accounts

What does it mean to have a 401(k)? IRA?

View Course »

TurboTax Articles

Top 5 Reasons to Adjust Your W-4 Withholding

Common lifestyle changes, like getting a job or getting married, can change your tax liability. To avoid being caught off guard by an unexpected tax bill or huge tax refund, you'll need to adjust your withholdings on your paycheck.

Does Everyone Need to File an Income Tax Return?

Not everyone is required to file an income tax return each year. Generally, if your total income for the year doesn't exceed the standard deduction plus one exemption and you aren't a dependent to another taxpayer, then you don't need to file a federal tax return. The amount of income that you can earn before you are required to file a tax return also depends on the type of income, your age and your filing status.

How to Write Off Sales Taxes

The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) permits you to write off either your state and local income tax or sales taxes when itemizing your deductions. People who live in a state that does not impose income taxes often benefit most from this deduction. However, you might also be better off deducting sales taxes instead of income taxes if you make large purchases during the year and your total sales tax payments exceed those for state income tax. You can use either the actual sales taxes you paid or the IRS optional sales tax tables.

Add a Comment

*0 / 3000 Character Maximum

179 Comments

Filter by:
LiberalsRUglyAmerica

Everyone should bill the IRS $25 per hour for the time spent on providing tax returns as that makes you a temporary employee/agent of the IRS.

April 12 2012 at 1:33 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
SomebodySmart

The best way to make sure nobody gets audited is to elect Ron Paul, who will repeal the federal income tax.

February 28 2012 at 6:42 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
izraulhidashi

I.R.S = Individually Raped and Sodomized

February 07 2012 at 3:08 AM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rita

there will NEVER!!!!!!!!!!!!! be a flat tax. you no how many irs workers would be out of a job.

February 05 2012 at 11:48 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Rita's comment
Dale

The complicated part of doing taxes is NOT figuring out your tax rate. The complicated part is figuring out your income. A flat tax rate would not save time it would just legitimize unfair taxes on the poor. It's a really stupid idea and it wouldn't put any IRS workers out of work.

March 30 2012 at 9:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Cara

uh reading articles like this???duh...

February 05 2012 at 8:20 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Rick

dont pay your taxes and see what happens! U b ib jail!

February 04 2012 at 3:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
sarwark

I think, income tax should be free of all loopholes.A flat rate of income tax for all earnings whether wages or investments should be intoduced. All senior citizens (65 and above) should exempted from all kinds of taxing including ss income and others. The roll of IRS should be adjusted to tax witholding area only based on flat tax rate. Tax return activities should be completely stopped.

February 04 2012 at 3:02 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Jodie

Abolish the Income Tax. I think the IRS should be abolished period - it's really sad that it is not federal law - the income tax has no basis, but politicians and corporate america can steel from you but you can't refuse to give them. This is a bit lopsided and they have the world hooked up so you have to have direct deposit, giving them first and giving you and your family the left overs. So, if this is not a law why doesn't some political stooge do something about it? Get rid of the tax period and all politicians should serve 4 to 8 years salary based on that of federal employees pay scale.

February 04 2012 at 1:53 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
1 reply to Jodie's comment
Dale

It's actually settled law. I believe it actually went to the Supreme Court and was upheld and I'm glad it was. I'm cheap but I'm not stupid.

March 30 2012 at 9:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Greg

The IRS.. Infernal Revenue dis-Service. Buckingham you are correct. IRS is an Federalized agency constructed in Fraud. Their ' code' is further complicated by ' words of art' under the ' Color of Law'...Looks like law, acts like law..but IS only the ' color of law' Code never supercedes the law. IRS code is cross referenced with US Code and FRCP ( Federal Rules of Civil Procedure). The Income tax is VOLUNATARY to most Americans residing in the states.
Didn't know that? No one ever told you?..Never saw it in print ? Look again. Supreme Court stated it in case law many years ago..quote -" Our tax system is based upon VOLUNTARY ASSESSMENT & PAYMENT, NOT upon DISTRAINT." Flora v U.S., 362 U.S. , Helvering v Mitchell, 303 IS.., Treasury REGULATIONS on Procedural Rules ( 1954 code) s/s 601.103 (a). // 26 CFR s/s 601.602 (a) . See - Gregory v Helvering.
As for the 16 th Amend. 'There is no enabling clause [.] See- Peck v Lowe, 247 US 165. // Stanton v Baltic Mining Co., 240 U.S. 103 // Eisner v Macomber 252 U.S. 189, at 205 and ' For the Record'.. ie. 1979 H.Zaritsky, legislative atty. for Congressional Research Svc. Library of Congress, as per request of Congress, determined " the 16th Amend. had NO Legal effect ." There's much more. Learn.

February 04 2012 at 1:38 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply
Buckingham's

Don't steal from the government. The IRS hates competition.

February 04 2012 at 12:03 PM Report abuse rate up rate down Reply